Gate Info Trendanalysis

gate-info-trendanalysis

General Rules

⚠️ STOP — You MUST read and strictly follow the shared runtime rules before proceeding. Do NOT select or call any tool until all rules are read. These rules have the highest priority. → Read gate-runtime-rules.md → Also read info-news-runtime-rules.md for gate-info / gate-news-specific rules (tool degradation, report standards, security, routing degradation, per-skill version checks when scripts/ is present, and legacy wrapper routing).

• Only call MCP tools explicitly listed in this skill. Tools not documented here must NOT be called, even if they exist in the MCP server.
• Legacy / routing mode: when Step 0 emits __FALLBACK__, use only the MCP tools listed in this file. When Step 0 emits __ROUTE_CLI__, do not call those MCP tools; delegate to the mapped primary skill per Step 0.

A technicals-focused Skill. The user inputs a coin name + technical analysis intent; the system calls 4 Tools (K-line data, indicator history, multi-timeframe signals, real-time market snapshot) in parallel, then the LLM aggregates into a multi-dimensional technical analysis report.

Trigger Scenarios: User explicitly mentions technical analysis, K-line, indicators, trend, support/resistance, or similar keywords.

Per-skill updates: This directory includes scripts/update-skill.sh and may include scripts/update-skill.ps1. ClawHub packages uploaded to the marketplace often omit update-skill.ps1 (upload-page restriction); GitHub / Bitbucket source trees keep both. Policy: info-news-runtime-rules.md §1. The Trigger update steps below apply in addition to gate-runtime-rules.md; when scripts are present, use this flow for version checks before execution.

Update check — user visibility: Technical failures during version check (missing script, sandbox, network, non-zero exit, no parseable Result= line) must not be explained to the user; continue with Execution per info-news-runtime-rules.md. Only successful check / apply outcomes may be summarized (including update_available / strict exit 3, which is still a success path that requires user confirmation before apply). Do not auto-download update-skill.* from the network. Static reference if .ps1 is missing: canonical scripts live in gate/gate-skills under skills/<name>/scripts/ (same <name> as frontmatter).

Step 0 — Wrapper routing probe

This legacy skill is a compatibility alias for the primary CLI skill gate-info-research.

Before Trigger update, MCP tool selection, or any legacy Execution Workflow, run a deterministic shell probe:

PRIMARY_SKILL="gate-info-research"
HAS_PRIMARY=0
for root in \
  "$HOME/.cursor/skills" \
  "$HOME/.codex/skills" \
  "$HOME/.openclaw/skills" \
  "$HOME/.agents/skills" \
  "$HOME/.gemini/antigravity/skills"
do
  if [ -f "$root/$PRIMARY_SKILL/SKILL.md" ]; then
    HAS_PRIMARY=1
    break
  fi
done

if command -v gate-cli >/dev/null 2>&1 && [ "$HAS_PRIMARY" = "1" ]; then
  echo "__ROUTE_CLI__"
else
  echo "__FALLBACK__"
fi

Interpretation:

• __ROUTE_CLI__ → stop here. Do not run Trigger update or the legacy MCP sections below. Follow https://github.com/gate/gate-skills/blob/master/skills/gate-info-research/SKILL.md and its playbook contract. Carry over the minimum context: symbol, plus optional trend-window hints if the user already supplied them.
• __FALLBACK__ → continue with Trigger update and the legacy MCP workflow in this file.

Trigger update (with Execution)

Default (PD / blocking): On each trigger, run check first without GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_MODE=auto. The script only compares local vs remote; if Result=update_available, it does not overwrite files. STOP — ask the user whether to update before any apply, run, or skill Execution. In sandboxes (e.g. Cursor), use full / all permissions when later running apply. This matches blocking update confirmation in the independent-script TEST_REPORT: blocking is enforced by these SKILL instructions plus check-only behavior (not by silent auto-apply).

Strict check (Agent / IDE — recommended on check): Use GATE_SKILL_CHECK_STRICT=1. When Result=update_available, check exits 3 and prints GATE_SKILL_CHECK_EXIT=3 — it stops only that shell step. Hard rule: after you ask the user, end this assistant turn; do not call apply, run, or MCP in the same message. run applies without a prior user step — do not use run in chat for the blocking flow; use check → user confirms → apply.

Step 1 — Check

Install root: check / apply read $DEST/SKILL.md. Typical $SKILL_ROOT: $HOME/.cursor/skills/<name>/, $HOME/.codex/skills/<name>/, $HOME/.openclaw/skills/<name>/, $HOME/.agents/skills/<name>/, $HOME/.gemini/antigravity/skills/<name>/. Single-arg: the script resolves DEST in that order when SKILL.md exists; otherwise DEST is scripts/../. Workspace-only trees need two-arg check / apply with explicit DEST.

Agent selection rules (run at most one of the fenced examples below; choose by OS and files under $SKILL_ROOT/scripts/):

• macOS / Linux / WSL / Git Bash: If update-skill.sh exists → use only the Bash example.
• Windows (native PowerShell): If update-skill.ps1 exists → use only the PowerShell example.
• Windows without .ps1 (typical ClawHub install): If only update-skill.sh exists → try WSL or Git Bash (bash) using the same command shape as the Bash example. If bash is unavailable or execution fails → skip Step 1 silently (no script stderr or “version check failed” message to the user); proceed to Execution.
• Neither script exists: Skip Step 1 silently; proceed to Execution. Do not invent GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN or run apply / revoke-pending.

Bash (blocking — no auto; example Cursor):

GATE_SKILL_CHECK_STRICT=1 bash "$HOME/.cursor/skills/gate-info-trendanalysis/scripts/update-skill.sh" check "gate-info-trendanalysis"

PowerShell:

$env:GATE_SKILL_CHECK_STRICT = '1'
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File "$env:USERPROFILE\.cursor\skills\gate-info-trendanalysis\scripts\update-skill.ps1" check "gate-info-trendanalysis"

Result semantics: skipped = no action. update_available = remote newer; with blocking flow, do not apply until the user agrees. check_failed = could not compare — proceed with current version per info-news-runtime-rules.md; do not surface technical check failure details to the user.

Agent parse (stdout): GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_AGENT_ACTION=…. BLOCK_UNTIL_USER_CONFIRMS_UPDATE → Step 2 before Execution. CONTINUE_SKILL_EXECUTION → no block from the check script.

Step 2 — Confirm or Reject (blocking)

Runtime: Use the same shell family for Step 2 as for Step 1 (Bash vs PowerShell). If Step 1 was skipped, do not run apply or revoke-pending.

If update_available:

1. STOP — do NOT proceed to Execution yet.

2. Inform the user (e.g. newer version available; summarize if helpful).

3. Wait for the user’s reply — blocking step.

   Hard rule (Cursor / Agent): When check reports update_available, or BLOCK_UNTIL_USER_CONFIRMS_UPDATE, or strict exit 3, end this turn after asking. Only in the user’s next message run apply (if they agree) or revoke-pending (if they decline). Do not chain apply in the same turn as check for this flow.

   • User agrees → run apply with GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN from strict check stdout when required, then Execution.
   • User declines → revoke-pending, then Execution on the current install.

Two-step gate (strict check): apply / run (without GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_MODE=auto) fail until GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN matches .gate-skill-apply-token. User decline → revoke-pending.

GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN="<paste from check stdout>" bash "$HOME/.cursor/skills/gate-info-trendanalysis/scripts/update-skill.sh" apply "gate-info-trendanalysis"

bash "$HOME/.cursor/skills/gate-info-trendanalysis/scripts/update-skill.sh" revoke-pending "gate-info-trendanalysis"

$env:GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN = '<paste from check stdout>'
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File "$env:USERPROFILE\.cursor\skills\gate-info-trendanalysis\scripts\update-skill.ps1" apply "gate-info-trendanalysis"

powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File "$env:USERPROFILE\.cursor\skills\gate-info-trendanalysis\scripts\update-skill.ps1" revoke-pending "gate-info-trendanalysis"

If Step 1 was not strict (no pending token): apply without GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN is allowed.

If skipped or check_failed: no update step; proceed to Execution.

Optional — GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_MODE=auto

For CI / unattended automation only: setting GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_MODE=auto on check makes the script apply immediately when the remote is newer — no user confirmation and incompatible with blocking update confirmation tests. Do not use auto on check when reproducing the blocking PD flow.

Parameters

• name: Frontmatter name above; must match skills/<name>/ on gate-skills.
• Invoke: Use $SKILL_ROOT/scripts/update-skill.sh (or .ps1) where $SKILL_ROOT/SKILL.md is this skill — e.g. ~/.cursor/skills/<name>, ~/.codex/skills/<name>, ~/.openclaw/skills/<name>, ~/.agents/skills/<name>, ~/.gemini/antigravity/skills/<name>; do not treat ~/.cursor (or any host root without skills/<name>/SKILL.md) as the install. With one arg, the script resolves $SKILL_ROOT in that order before falling back to the script’s directory; workspace installs need explicit DEST. Two-arg check / apply / revoke-pending: canonical order is absolute DEST (skill root) first, then name; update-skill.sh / update-skill.ps1 auto-swap when only one normalized path contains SKILL.md (e.g. agent passes name then path).
• ClawHub vs full tree: Installs without update-skill.ps1 may copy it from gate/gate-skills under skills/<name>/scripts/ (manual only; agents must not auto-download).

Do not dump raw script logs into the user-facing reply except when debugging. On check exit 3 (strict), do not run Execution until Step 2 is resolved. On check_failed or apply failure, still run Execution when appropriate per runtime rules.

MCP Dependencies

Legacy path only — this section applies when Step 0 emitted __FALLBACK__.

Required MCP Servers

MCP Tools Used

Query Operations (Read-only)

• info_marketsnapshot_get_market_snapshot
• info_markettrend_get_indicator_history
• info_markettrend_get_kline
• info_markettrend_get_technical_analysis

Authentication

• API Key Required: No
• Credentials Source: None; this skill uses read-only Gate Info / Gate News MCP access only.

Installation Check

• Required: Gate-Info
• Install: Use the local Gate MCP installation flow for the current host IDE before continuing.
• Continue only after the required Gate MCP server is available in the current environment.

Routing Rules

Legacy path only — when Step 0 emitted __ROUTE_CLI__, routing is delegated to gate-info-research.

Execution Workflow

Legacy path only — this section applies when Step 0 emitted __FALLBACK__.

Step 0: Multi-Dimension Intent Check

Before executing this Skill, check if the user's query involves multiple analysis dimensions:

• If the query is exclusively about technical indicators or trend analysis for one coin, proceed with this Skill.
• If the query also mentions fundamentals, risk, news, sentiment, or any other analysis dimension beyond technicals, route to gate-info-research — it handles multi-dimension queries with unified tool deduplication and coherent report aggregation.

Step 1: Intent Recognition & Parameter Extraction

Extract from user input:

• symbol: Coin ticker (BTC, ETH, SOL, etc.)
• timeframe: Analysis timeframe (e.g., "daily" → 1d, "4-hour" → 4h; default: 1d)
• indicators: Specific indicators the user cares about (e.g., "RSI", "MACD"; default: all)
• period: K-line lookback days (default: 90)

Step 2: Call 4 MCP Tools in Parallel

All 4 Tools are called in parallel.

Step 3: LLM Analysis

The LLM performs technical analysis on the raw data, completing the following reasoning:

1. Identify trend from candlestick patterns (uptrend / downtrend / sideways channel)
2. Combine indicator history to assess current position (overbought / oversold / neutral)
3. Evaluate multi-timeframe signal alignment or divergence
4. Identify key support and resistance levels

Step 4: Output Structured Report

Report Template

Legacy path only — this section applies when Step 0 emitted __FALLBACK__.

## {symbol} Technical Analysis Report

> Analysis time: {timestamp} | Primary timeframe: {timeframe}

### 1. Current Market Snapshot

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Price | ${price} |
| 24h Change | {change_24h}% |
| 24h Volume | ${volume_24h} |
| 24h High | ${high_24h} |
| 24h Low | ${low_24h} |
| Open Interest | ${oi} (if available) |
| Funding Rate | {funding_rate}% (if available) |

### 2. Trend Assessment

**Overall Trend**: {Uptrend / Downtrend / Sideways / Trend Reversal}

{Trend analysis based on candlestick patterns and MA alignment:}
- MA7 / MA25 / MA99 alignment: {Bullish / Bearish / Tangled}
- Recent candlestick patterns: {Bullish Engulfing / Doji / Hammer / etc.} (if notable)
- Volume confirmation: {Rising volume + price up (healthy) / Declining volume + price up (weak momentum) / Rising volume + price down (accelerated selling)}

### 3. Technical Indicator Details

#### RSI (14)
| Timeframe | Value | Status |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| 1h | {rsi_1h} | {Overbought/Oversold/Neutral} |
| 4h | {rsi_4h} | {Overbought/Oversold/Neutral} |
| 1d | {rsi_1d} | {Overbought/Oversold/Neutral} |

{RSI divergence analysis: any bullish/bearish divergence present?}

#### MACD
| Timeframe | DIF | DEA | Histogram | Status |
|-----------|-----|-----|-----------|--------|
| 1h | {dif} | {dea} | {histogram} | {Golden Cross/Death Cross/Above Zero/Below Zero} |
| 4h | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 1d | ... | ... | ... | ... |

#### Bollinger Bands (20, 2)
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Upper Band | ${upper} |
| Middle Band | ${middle} |
| Lower Band | ${lower} |
| Bandwidth | {bandwidth}% |
| Current Position | {price relative to bands + percentile} |

{Narrowing bands → breakout imminent; price touching upper band → potential pullback to middle; touching lower band → potential bounce}

### 4. Key Price Levels

| Type | Price | Basis |
|------|-------|-------|
| Strong Resistance | ${resistance_1} | {Previous high / MA99 / Upper Bollinger / Round number} |
| Weak Resistance | ${resistance_2} | ... |
| Weak Support | ${support_1} | ... |
| Strong Support | ${support_2} | {Previous low / MA99 / Lower Bollinger / Volume profile cluster} |

### 5. Multi-Timeframe Signal Summary

| Timeframe | Composite Signal | Bullish Indicators | Bearish Indicators |
|-----------|-----------------|--------------------|--------------------|
| 1h | {Strong Buy/Buy/Neutral/Sell/Strong Sell} | {count} | {count} |
| 4h | ... | ... | ... |
| 1d | ... | ... | ... |
| 1w | ... | ... | ... |

**Signal Consistency**: {Are multi-timeframe signals aligned? e.g., "Short-term bearish but medium/long-term bullish — divergence present"}

### 6. Overall Technical Assessment

{LLM generates a comprehensive assessment:}
- Current trend strength evaluation
- Short-term (1-3 day) likely direction
- Medium-term (1-2 week) likely direction
- Key observation: a break above ${resistance_1} opens upside; a break below ${support_2} signals trend weakening

### Risk Warnings

{Data-driven risk alerts}

> Technical analysis is based on historical data and cannot predict future price movements. This does not constitute investment advice.

Decision Logic

Error Handling

Cross-Skill Routing

Safety Rules

1. No trading advice: Do not output "recommend going long/short" or "buy at XX"
2. No specific price predictions: Do not output "will rise to XX tomorrow" or "target price XX"
3. Acknowledge limitations: Clearly state that technical analysis is based on historical data and may fail
4. Data transparency: Label K-line data range and indicator parameter settings
5. Flag missing data: When indicators are unavailable, explicitly state it — never fabricate values