Universal Best Practices
This skill provides comprehensive guidance on software engineering best practices that apply across all programming languages and project types. Follow these principles to ensure clean, maintainable, production-ready code.
Core Workflow
When writing or reviewing code:
- Start with KISS and YAGNI - implement the simplest thing that solves the current need
- Apply SOLID principles to structure your classes and modules
- Ensure DRY by eliminating duplication
- Use SoC to separate concerns into distinct responsibilities
- Follow LoD to minimize coupling between components
- Apply remaining principles as relevant to your specific context
Fundamental Principles
SOLID
Five core object-oriented design principles that make code maintainable and flexible:
S - Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
- Each class/module should have only ONE reason to change
- One class = one job or responsibility
- Example: Separate
UserRepository (data access) from UserValidator (validation logic)
- Benefit: Changes to one responsibility don't affect unrelated code
O - Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
- Open for extension, closed for modification
- Add new functionality without changing existing code
- Use interfaces, abstract classes, or inheritance to extend behavior
- Example: Plugin systems, strategy patterns
- Benefit: Add features without risking existing functionality
L - Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
- Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types
- Child classes shouldn't break parent class contracts
- Example: If
Bird has fly(), don't create Penguin extends Bird - penguins can't fly
- Benefit: Polymorphism works correctly, no surprises
I - Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
- No class should implement methods it doesn't use
- Many specific interfaces > one general interface
- Example: Split
IWorker into IWorkable and IEatable instead of forcing robots to implement eat()
- Benefit: Lean interfaces, no unnecessary dependencies
D - Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
- Depend on abstractions, not concrete implementations
- High-level modules shouldn't depend on low-level modules
- Both should depend on abstractions
- Example:
PaymentProcessor depends on IPaymentGateway interface, not concrete StripeGateway
- Benefit: Loose coupling, easy to swap implementations
DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- Every piece of knowledge has ONE authoritative representation
- Avoid duplicating logic, even if written differently
- Example: Extract common tax calculation logic into single function instead of repeating across products
- Benefit: Changes happen in one place, consistency guaranteed
KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid)
- Prefer the simplest solution that works
- Avoid unnecessary complexity and cleverness
- Simple code is easier to understand, maintain, and debug
- Example: Use straightforward conditionals over complex nested ternaries
- Benefit: Code is readable and less error-prone
YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)
- Don't build features you don't need right now
- No speculative functionality for hypothetical future needs
- Focus on current requirements
- Example: Don't build a recommendation engine if you only need product listing
- Benefit: Less code to maintain, faster delivery
Architectural Principles
SoC (Separation of Concerns)
- Divide code into distinct sections, each addressing a separate concern
- Each module focuses on ONE aspect of functionality
- Example: Separate data layer, business logic, and presentation
- Benefit: Changes to one concern don't affect others
SSOT (Single Source of Truth)
- Every data element is mastered in only ONE place
- All other references point to or derive from this source
- Example: User profile data lives in one database table, not duplicated across systems
- Benefit: No data inconsistency, one place to update
LoD (Law of Demeter) - Principle of Least Knowledge
- Object should only talk to immediate friends
- Don't access nested objects:
a.getB().getC().doSomething() violates LoD
- Instead:
a.doSomethingWithC() where A delegates internally
- Rule: Method can only call methods on:
- Itself (
this)
- Its parameters
- Objects it creates
- Its direct properties
- Benefit: Reduced coupling, easier refactoring
CQS (Command Query Separation)
- Methods should either:
- Command: Change state (return void)
- Query: Return data (don't change state)
- Never both in same method
- Example:
getBalance() reads only, withdraw() changes only
- Exception: Sometimes
pop() or incrementAndGet() violates this for practical reasons
- Benefit: Predictable behavior, easier reasoning
DbC (Design by Contract)
- Define explicit preconditions, postconditions, and invariants
- Preconditions: What must be true before method runs
- Postconditions: What must be true after method completes
- Invariants: What must always be true for the object
- Example:
withdraw(amount) requires amount > 0 (precondition) and balance >= amount (precondition), ensures new_balance = old_balance - amount (postcondition)
- Benefit: Clear contracts, fail-fast validation
Operational Principles
ETC (Easier to Change)
- Optimize for change cost, not cleverness
- Ask: "Will this be easy to modify later?"
- Prefer composition over inheritance
- Keep coupling loose, cohesion high
- Benefit: Code adapts to evolving requirements
PoLP (Principle of Least Privilege)
- Grant minimum permissions needed for the task
- Processes run with minimal privileges
- Functions access only what they need
- Example: Read-only database connection for queries, no write access
- Benefit: Reduced attack surface, limited blast radius
CoC (Convention over Configuration)
- Use sensible defaults over explicit configuration
- Follow standard conventions to reduce decisions
- Only configure when deviating from convention
- Example: Rails assumes
User class maps to users table - no config needed
- Benefit: Less boilerplate, faster development, easier onboarding
Idempotency
- Operation produces same result whether executed once or multiple times
- Safe to retry without side effects
- Critical for distributed systems and APIs
- Example:
PUT /users/123 with same data always results in same user state
- Implementation: Use idempotency keys, request IDs, or natural idempotency
- Benefit: Safe retries, fault tolerance, consistency
POLA (Principle of Least Astonishment)
- System behavior should match user expectations
- Code does what it looks like it does
- No surprises or unexpected behavior
- Example:
delete() should delete, not archive
- Benefit: Intuitive code, fewer bugs from misunderstanding
Principle Application Priority
When multiple principles conflict:
- Safety first: PoLP, DbC preconditions
- Simplicity: KISS, YAGNI
- Maintainability: DRY, SoC, SRP
- Flexibility: OCP, DIP, ETC
- Consistency: POLA, CoC
Common Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Premature optimization: Violates YAGNI and KISS
- God classes: Violates SRP and SoC
- Deep nesting: Violates LoD
- Copy-paste code: Violates DRY
- Magic numbers/strings: Violates SSOT and maintainability
- Mixing commands and queries: Violates CQS
- Over-engineering: Violates KISS and YAGNI
Quick Reference
For detailed examples and language-specific implementations, see:
references/solid-examples.md - SOLID principle examples
references/patterns-reference.md - Design pattern applications of principles
When Principles Conflict
DRY vs KISS: If abstraction becomes complex, duplicate similar code
YAGNI vs Future-proofing: Build for today, refactor when tomorrow arrives
LoD vs Performance: Sometimes direct access is needed - document why
CQS vs Pragmatism: Database pop() operations can violate CQS when needed
Remember: Principles are guidelines, not laws. Apply with judgment based on context.
1---2name: best-practices3description: Universal software engineering best practices for any language or project. Use when programming, refactoring code, designing systems, reviewing code, or ensuring production-ready quality. Covers fundamental principles (SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI), architectural patterns (SoC, SSOT, LoD, CQS, DbC), and operational reliability (ETC, PoLP, CoC, Idempotency). Apply when building new features, cleaning up codebases, improving maintainability, or ensuring code follows industry standards.4---56# Universal Best Practices78This skill provides comprehensive guidance on software engineering best practices that apply across all programming languages and project types. Follow these principles to ensure clean, maintainable, production-ready code.910## Core Workflow1112When writing or reviewing code:13141. Start with KISS and YAGNI - implement the simplest thing that solves the current need152. Apply SOLID principles to structure your classes and modules163. Ensure DRY by eliminating duplication174. Use SoC to separate concerns into distinct responsibilities185. Follow LoD to minimize coupling between components196. Apply remaining principles as relevant to your specific context2021## Fundamental Principles2223### SOLID2425Five core object-oriented design principles that make code maintainable and flexible:2627**S - Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)**28- Each class/module should have only ONE reason to change29- One class = one job or responsibility30- Example: Separate `UserRepository` (data access) from `UserValidator` (validation logic)31- Benefit: Changes to one responsibility don't affect unrelated code3233**O - Open/Closed Principle (OCP)**34- Open for extension, closed for modification35- Add new functionality without changing existing code36- Use interfaces, abstract classes, or inheritance to extend behavior37- Example: Plugin systems, strategy patterns38- Benefit: Add features without risking existing functionality3940**L - Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)**41- Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types42- Child classes shouldn't break parent class contracts43- Example: If `Bird` has `fly()`, don't create `Penguin extends Bird` - penguins can't fly44- Benefit: Polymorphism works correctly, no surprises4546**I - Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)**47- No class should implement methods it doesn't use48- Many specific interfaces > one general interface49- Example: Split `IWorker` into `IWorkable` and `IEatable` instead of forcing robots to implement `eat()`50- Benefit: Lean interfaces, no unnecessary dependencies5152**D - Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)**53- Depend on abstractions, not concrete implementations54- High-level modules shouldn't depend on low-level modules55- Both should depend on abstractions56- Example: `PaymentProcessor` depends on `IPaymentGateway` interface, not concrete `StripeGateway`57- Benefit: Loose coupling, easy to swap implementations5859### DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)6061- Every piece of knowledge has ONE authoritative representation62- Avoid duplicating logic, even if written differently63- Example: Extract common tax calculation logic into single function instead of repeating across products64- Benefit: Changes happen in one place, consistency guaranteed6566### KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid)6768- Prefer the simplest solution that works69- Avoid unnecessary complexity and cleverness70- Simple code is easier to understand, maintain, and debug71- Example: Use straightforward conditionals over complex nested ternaries72- Benefit: Code is readable and less error-prone7374### YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)7576- Don't build features you don't need right now77- No speculative functionality for hypothetical future needs78- Focus on current requirements79- Example: Don't build a recommendation engine if you only need product listing80- Benefit: Less code to maintain, faster delivery8182## Architectural Principles8384### SoC (Separation of Concerns)8586- Divide code into distinct sections, each addressing a separate concern87- Each module focuses on ONE aspect of functionality88- Example: Separate data layer, business logic, and presentation89- Benefit: Changes to one concern don't affect others9091### SSOT (Single Source of Truth)9293- Every data element is mastered in only ONE place94- All other references point to or derive from this source95- Example: User profile data lives in one database table, not duplicated across systems96- Benefit: No data inconsistency, one place to update9798### LoD (Law of Demeter) - Principle of Least Knowledge99100- Object should only talk to immediate friends101- Don't access nested objects: `a.getB().getC().doSomething()` violates LoD102- Instead: `a.doSomethingWithC()` where A delegates internally103- **Rule**: Method can only call methods on:104 - Itself (`this`)105 - Its parameters106 - Objects it creates107 - Its direct properties108- Benefit: Reduced coupling, easier refactoring109110### CQS (Command Query Separation)111112- Methods should either:113 - **Command**: Change state (return void)114 - **Query**: Return data (don't change state)115- Never both in same method116- Example: `getBalance()` reads only, `withdraw()` changes only117- Exception: Sometimes `pop()` or `incrementAndGet()` violates this for practical reasons118- Benefit: Predictable behavior, easier reasoning119120### DbC (Design by Contract)121122- Define explicit preconditions, postconditions, and invariants123- **Preconditions**: What must be true before method runs124- **Postconditions**: What must be true after method completes125- **Invariants**: What must always be true for the object126- Example: `withdraw(amount)` requires `amount > 0` (precondition) and `balance >= amount` (precondition), ensures `new_balance = old_balance - amount` (postcondition)127- Benefit: Clear contracts, fail-fast validation128129## Operational Principles130131### ETC (Easier to Change)132133- Optimize for change cost, not cleverness134- Ask: "Will this be easy to modify later?"135- Prefer composition over inheritance136- Keep coupling loose, cohesion high137- Benefit: Code adapts to evolving requirements138139### PoLP (Principle of Least Privilege)140141- Grant minimum permissions needed for the task142- Processes run with minimal privileges143- Functions access only what they need144- Example: Read-only database connection for queries, no write access145- Benefit: Reduced attack surface, limited blast radius146147### CoC (Convention over Configuration)148149- Use sensible defaults over explicit configuration150- Follow standard conventions to reduce decisions151- Only configure when deviating from convention152- Example: Rails assumes `User` class maps to `users` table - no config needed153- Benefit: Less boilerplate, faster development, easier onboarding154155### Idempotency156157- Operation produces same result whether executed once or multiple times158- Safe to retry without side effects159- Critical for distributed systems and APIs160- Example: `PUT /users/123` with same data always results in same user state161- Implementation: Use idempotency keys, request IDs, or natural idempotency162- Benefit: Safe retries, fault tolerance, consistency163164### POLA (Principle of Least Astonishment)165166- System behavior should match user expectations167- Code does what it looks like it does168- No surprises or unexpected behavior169- Example: `delete()` should delete, not archive170- Benefit: Intuitive code, fewer bugs from misunderstanding171172## Principle Application Priority173174When multiple principles conflict:1751761. **Safety first**: PoLP, DbC preconditions1772. **Simplicity**: KISS, YAGNI1783. **Maintainability**: DRY, SoC, SRP1794. **Flexibility**: OCP, DIP, ETC1805. **Consistency**: POLA, CoC181182## Common Anti-Patterns to Avoid183184- **Premature optimization**: Violates YAGNI and KISS185- **God classes**: Violates SRP and SoC186- **Deep nesting**: Violates LoD187- **Copy-paste code**: Violates DRY188- **Magic numbers/strings**: Violates SSOT and maintainability189- **Mixing commands and queries**: Violates CQS190- **Over-engineering**: Violates KISS and YAGNI191192## Quick Reference193194For detailed examples and language-specific implementations, see:195- `references/solid-examples.md` - SOLID principle examples196- `references/patterns-reference.md` - Design pattern applications of principles197198## When Principles Conflict199200**DRY vs KISS**: If abstraction becomes complex, duplicate similar code201**YAGNI vs Future-proofing**: Build for today, refactor when tomorrow arrives202**LoD vs Performance**: Sometimes direct access is needed - document why203**CQS vs Pragmatism**: Database `pop()` operations can violate CQS when needed204205Remember: Principles are guidelines, not laws. Apply with judgment based on context.