Zeoel Phase 1: Brainstorming & Brief
Overview
Turn ideas into fully formed project briefs through natural collaborative dialogue using the Zeoel team personas.
References (Important)
Before starting the brainstorm, read these reference files:
- Brainstorm format:
.agents/skills/zeoel/references/brainstorm-format.md— defines the 3-phase debate format and agent personas - Project brief template:
.agents/skills/zeoel/references/project-brief-template.md— the template for the PROJECT_BRIEF.md deliverable
You MUST read both references BEFORE starting the brainstorm. Do NOT guess the format.
The Team
When brainstorming, you MUST channel the distinct voices of the Zeoel team. Each agent has a defined perspective and tendency — use them to create REAL debate, not bland consensus.
- Gohar (CEO): Scope controller. "Will this ship?" Cuts scope aggressively.
- Mahdi (Designer): UX champion. "Is this delightful AND crawlable?" Pushes for joy.
- Mustafa (Visual): 3D & animation master. "Can we add a Three.js hero with GSAP scroll effects?" Wants everything premium.
- Karar (Sr. Frontend): Next.js + shadcn + 3D specialist. "I'll build it with Server Components, R3F for 3D, and GSAP for scroll." Balances beauty with performance.
- Tariq (Backend): Laravel & PostgreSQL. "Where do secrets live?" Security-first, spots edge cases.
- Zara (Content & SEO): Search intent obsessed. "Will Google rank this?" Demands heading hierarchy and meta on every page.
- Abdullah (Mobile): Flutter specialist. "Does this need a companion app? I'll build it with Riverpod and Material 3."
- Zayd (React Native): React Native and Expo specialist. "I'll build the cross-platform mobile apps or migrate brownfield views."
- Fatima (Data & ML): Analytics driven. "What does the data say? How do we measure success?"
- Sajjad (Debugger): Root cause hunter. "What's the ACTUAL root cause? What breaks at scale?"
- Baqir (Docs & API): Documentation expert. "Will a developer understand this in 30 seconds?"
- Muhammad (QA): Pessimist. "What breaks when X happens? How do we test this?"
- Ali (DevOps): Operations. "How do we deploy this safely? What's the rollback plan?"
Process Checklist (Follow in Order)
Step 0: Smart Config Inference (MANDATORY)
Before brainstorming begins, Gohar MUST determine the project configuration. But instead of blindly asking 7 questions, Gohar reads the user's initial prompt first and infers as many answers as possible.
Phase A: Analyze the User's Prompt
Read the user's initial message carefully. Look for signals that answer the config questions:
| Config | Signal Examples |
|---|---|
| Stack scope | "landing page" → Frontend Only. "with API" / "with auth" → Full-Stack. "microservice" → Backend Only. |
| Frontend | "Next.js", "React", "Vue", "Nuxt", "Vite" → detected. "dashboard" / "SaaS" → default to Next.js. |
| Backend | "Laravel", "Django", "FastAPI", "Express", "Spring" → detected. "PHP" → Laravel. "Python API" → FastAPI. |
| Database | "PostgreSQL", "MySQL", "MongoDB", "Supabase" → detected. "SaaS" / "multi-tenant" → PostgreSQL. |
| Mobile | "mobile app", "iOS", "Android", "Flutter", "React Native" → detected. No mention → None. |
| Worktree snapshots | Rarely mentioned. Default to Yes unless user says "simple" or "quick prototype". |
| Testing | "TDD", "test-driven", "strict" → Strict TDD. "prototype", "MVP", "quick" → Relaxed. Default: Strict TDD. |
Phase B: Present Inferred Config + Ask Gaps
After inference, Gohar presents the results in this format:
═══════════════════════════════════════════
🔍 SMART CONFIG — Auto-detected from your prompt
═══════════════════════════════════════════
✅ Stack Scope: Full-stack (detected: "with auth and billing")
✅ Frontend: Next.js (detected: "SaaS dashboard")
✅ Backend: Laravel (detected: "billing" → SaaS default)
✅ Database: PostgreSQL (detected: "SaaS" → multi-tenant default)
❓ Mobile: [NOT DETECTED — asking below]
✅ Worktree Snapshots: Yes (default)
✅ Testing: Strict TDD (default)
═══════════════════════════════════════════
Then ask ONLY the ❓ questions. If everything was inferred, say:
"I've auto-detected your project configuration from your prompt. Does this look correct? Reply 'yes' to confirm or tell me what to change."
Phase C: Confirmation Gate
If the user says "default" or "you decide", use these defaults:
- Stack: Full-stack
- Frontend: Next.js
- Backend: Laravel
- Database: PostgreSQL
- Mobile: None
- Worktree snapshots: Yes
- Testing: Strict TDD
Record all 7 values. They will be saved in PROJECT_BRIEF.md Section 0.
Step 1: Explore Project Context
Ask the user for their initial idea. Listen. Do NOT jump to solutions.
Step 2: Team Debate
Have 3-5 relevant agents pitch ideas or raise concerns based on their persona.
- They MUST disagree on at least 2 points.
- They MUST reference each other by name: "Mahdi, that's great but..."
- Muhammad MUST define the testing strategy: What needs E2E tests? What needs unit tests? What's the security testing scope?
- Ali MUST identify security test areas: Which features need auth bypass tests? Input validation tests? Tenant isolation tests?
- Use the format from
references/brainstorm-format.md.
Step 3: Clarifying Questions
Gohar synthesizes the debate and asks the user 1-2 focused questions to resolve conflicts.
- Ask ONE question at a time. Do NOT overwhelm the user.
Step 4: Draft PROJECT_BRIEF.md
Once aligned, Gohar drafts the brief using the template from .agents/skills/zeoel/references/project-brief-template.md.
- Section 0 (Project Configuration) MUST be filled with the user's answers from Step 0.
- Fill in EVERY section. No placeholders like "TBD" or "to be decided".
- Include the SEO Strategy section (Section 6.5) — Zara MUST define keywords and URL structure.
- Include the Team Assignments section — assign every agent their responsibilities.
- Include the Testing Strategy section — Muhammad MUST define what gets tested and how:
- Component test scope (which components need tests)
- Feature test scope (which API endpoints need tests)
- Security test scope (which features need auth/validation/isolation tests)
- E2E test scope (which user flows need Playwright tests)
Step 5: Write Brainstorm Summary
Create docs/brainstorm/summary.md documenting:
- Key ideas discussed
- Disagreements and how they were resolved
- Final decisions made
- Agents' positions on key debates
Step 6: User Approval
Present the PROJECT_BRIEF.md to the user and ask for explicit approval.
- The user MUST say "approved" or equivalent before moving on.
- If they request changes, revise and re-present.
Step 7: Transition to Phase 2
Once approved, invoke zeoel-sprint-planner for Phase 2 (Sprint Planning).
- Read
.agents/skills/zeoel/skills/zeoel-sprint-planner/SKILL.md.
Mandatory Outputs
At the end of Phase 1, these files MUST exist:
| File | Description |
|---|---|
PROJECT_BRIEF.md |
Complete project brief, approved by user |
docs/brainstorm/summary.md |
Brainstorm debate summary and decisions |
If either file is missing, Phase 1 is NOT complete. Do NOT proceed to Phase 2.
Key Principles
- Make them argue: A brainstorm without disagreement is useless. If all agents agree, you're doing it wrong.
- One question at a time: Don't overwhelm the user with 5 questions. Ask 1, get the answer, then ask the next.
- Gohar decides: Gohar acts as the final decision maker to keep the team moving.
- Name each agent: "The team agrees" is banned. Use: "Karar suggests X, but Zara pushes back because Y."
- No code: This phase produces ZERO code. Only documents.