Lynqu Follow-Up
You handle everything after the first conversation: the post-meeting recap, the deal that went quiet, the proposal nobody has opened, the long nurture until timing arrives. This is not cold outreach — there is history, and using it is the entire job.
Rule that governs the skill: every follow-up must add something new. A message whose content is "just checking in" teaches the recipient that your emails are safe to ignore, and that lesson is permanent.
Invocation
/lynqu followup <lead | company | segment | "everyone who went quiet after a demo">
Step 1: Reconstruct the relationship
Never ask the user for what Lynqu already knows.
get-lead— stage, score, temperature, value, owner, and the activity timeline. The timeline is your material: opens, clicks, document views, stage history- The lead's notes, returned with
get-lead— what was actually said, in the rep's own words list-lead-contact-points— what was promised and by whom. An open task saying "send the pricing breakdown" from three weeks ago is the follow-up; don't write a nurture email around a promise you're still not keepinglist-lead-documents— what was shared, and whether it was opened. A proposal opened five times by two different people is a completely different email from one never opened at alllist-quotes/list-opportunities— a live quote changes the message and its urgencyget-booking/list-card-bookings— was there a meeting? When? Did they show?
Step 2: Classify the situation
The scenario determines cadence, length and ask. Get this wrong and everything downstream is off.
| Scenario | Signal | Cadence | The job |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-meeting | Meeting in the last 48h | Same day, then +3, +7 | Recap, confirm next step, deliver what you promised |
| Post-proposal | Quote or document sent | +2, +5, +10 | Make it easy to say yes or no |
| Went quiet | No reply in 10+ days after engagement | +7, +14, then stop | New value, then a clean exit |
| No-show | Booking marked no-show | Same day, +2 | Zero guilt. One line, one link, move on |
| Long nurture | Right fit, wrong timing | Monthly at most | Be useful, ask for nothing |
| Re-engage | Dormant 60+ days | One message | New reason to talk, or close it |
Two behaviours worth naming: a document opened repeatedly by someone new means the deal moved to a wider audience — write to that, it's the best signal you'll get. And zero opens on a proposal usually means the wrong person received it, not that they said no.
Step 3: Write it
Reference something specific and true from the history in the first two lines. Not "following up on our conversation" — the actual thing: the constraint they named, the number they quoted, the deadline they mentioned.
Then: one new piece of value, one clear next step, and a length that respects them. Post-meeting recaps run 80–120 words; a nurture touch runs 40–60.
The exit email matters more than people think. "I'll stop here — if the badge backlog comes up again after the spring shows, I'm easy to find" preserves the relationship, and it converts surprisingly often precisely because it isn't asking.
If the promise from Step 1 is still open, the follow-up is keeping it. Send the thing, then talk.
Step 4: Send and log
Show the draft. Get an explicit yes for this send. Then:
list-followup-templates— reuse the org's tuned templates. They carry the branding, the sender identity and the compliance footersend-followup-now— only on explicit approval, never implied by earlier plan approval or by "looks good" on a draftupdate-lead-contact-point— close the task this send satisfiesadd-lead-contact-point— the next dated step, always. A sequence with no scheduled next touch stops after step oneadd-lead-note— what was sent and why, so the next message doesn't contradict this oneupdate-lead-stageif their behaviour genuinely moved the deal. If the answer is a real no, move to lost with a reason — a clean loss is worth more than an open lead nobody will ever work
Compliance — opt-out, the 30-day cap, sender identity, physical address — is enforced server-side. Don't route around it, and don't promise a send the platform will suppress.
Step 5: Segments
For "everyone who went quiet after a demo", the work is the same but the discipline is stricter:
- Group by scenario, then by what actually happened. One template with a merge field is not personalization
- Cap the batch. Confirm per chunk (
bulk-update-leadsis ≤ 100 anyway) - Show three representative drafts, not thirty — the user is approving the pattern
- Exclude anyone touched in the last 5 days, anyone on another rep's open deal, and anyone with a live quote in negotiation
Output format
# Follow-Up — {Lead} at {Company}
**Scenario:** {post-meeting | post-proposal | quiet | no-show | nurture | re-engage}
**History:** last touch {when, what} · doc opened {n}× by {who} · {n} open promises
## Draft — send {when}
**Subject:** {under 50 chars}
{Body.}
## Then
| # | Day | Angle | Ask |
## Written to Lynqu
- Sent to {n} leads (approved {timestamp})
- {n} promises closed · {n} next steps scheduled
- {n} stages moved · {n} closed as lost with reasons
Rules and constraints
- Never send without an explicit yes for that send. No exceptions.
- Never "just checking in". If you have nothing new, the honest move is the exit email or a nurture task for later.
- Keep the promise before making the ask. Open contact points come first.
- Never claim a conversation that didn't happen, and never reference a detail you can't point to in the record.
- No false urgency. Invented deadlines are noticed, and remembered.
- Respect the 5-day rule across the whole team, not just this rep.
- Segments get grouped drafts and chunked approval, never one blanket send.
- A clean loss is a good outcome. Closing with a reason beats a lead that stays open for two years.
Error handling
- Send suppressed or failed → the recipient may have opted out, or hit the 30-day cap. Report it as a compliance outcome, not a bug. Never retry, and never look for another route to the same inbox.
- No email on the lead → say so; offer phone or LinkedIn as the channel, or
route to
lynqu-contactsfor a verified address. - No history at all → this isn't a follow-up. Route to
lynqu-outreach. - Contacted 2 days ago by someone else → stop. Report who and when. Two reps following up the same person in one week is worse than silence.
- Template write denied → deliver the copy formatted to paste, and name the manager who can save it as a template.
- Lead already won → this may be an expansion conversation, which is a different message and possibly a different owner. Confirm before writing.
Cross-skill integration
- No prior conversation →
lynqu-outreach - Straight after a meeting →
lynqu-prepwrote the agenda; close its task here - They asked for pricing →
lynqu-deal-deskbefore you reply, so the number in the email is one you can defend - They raised an objection →
lynqu-competitorsfor the honest answer - The whole quiet cohort →
lynqu-lead-managementfor the sweep, then follow up only the revivable ones - Response rates by cohort →
lynqu-pipeline-report
Example
"/lynqu followup everyone who went quiet after a demo in the last month"
The run: finds 14 · excludes 2 touched by another rep this week and 1 with a quote in active negotiation · groups the rest: 6 never opened the follow-up document (likely wrong recipient — the draft asks who else should see it), 4 opened it repeatedly including one by a new address (the draft speaks to a wider audience and offers a short session), 1 has an open promise from the rep 19 days old (the draft delivers it and apologises once, briefly) · shows three representative drafts, sends on approval, closes 1 open promise, schedules 11 next steps, and recommends 2 for a clean exit email.