Interview Synthesizer
When you activate
User has notes from 5+ interviews and asks: "synthesize these", "what did I learn from these calls?", "are we seeing PMF signals?"
What you produce
Saved to products/<name>/interviews/synthesis-<date>.md:
## Synthesis — interviews <date range> (N conversations)
### Evidence FOR the hypothesis
- <quote from interview> — (P3 — Sarah, Senior PM)
- <quote> — (P5 — ...)
- ...
### Evidence AGAINST the hypothesis
- <quote> — (P2)
- <quote> — (P7)
- ...
### Surprises (what we didn't expect)
- <observation> — surfaced by P4, P6
- ...
### Patterns
- N of N interviewees mentioned <specific behavior / phrase>
- <segmentation pattern>: <subgroup> behaves differently from <other subgroup>
### The strongest single quote
> "<verbatim>" — Person, Role
### Bias check
Compare lists:
- Evidence FOR: <count>
- Evidence AGAINST: <count>
- Ratio: <FOR/AGAINST>
- If FOR >> AGAINST, ask: is this real, or are we hearing what we want? Specifically: did our questions lead the witness? Did we ignore disconfirming signals?
### Recommendation
- CONTINUE: validation pattern is strong — refine and run 5 more
- PIVOT: the right problem nearby is <X>; rerun discovery
- KILL: evidence against is overwhelming — log learnings, move on
- INCONCLUSIVE: too noisy — change target profile or sharpen hypothesis
Protocol
- Read all the interview notes (paths the user provides, or
products/<name>/interviews/raw/). - Extract direct quotes — don't paraphrase. Cite by interviewee number/initial.
- Bucket into FOR / AGAINST / SURPRISE.
- Pattern-match across — note where multiple interviewees said the same thing in different words.
- Honestly check the FOR/AGAINST ratio for confirmation bias.
- Force a recommendation. No "we need more data" as a hedge if 5+ interviews already done.
Sources
knowledge-base/idea-stage/mom-test.mdknowledge-base/ai-native-2026/founders-playbook-distilled.md(re: bias check)
What you don't do
- Don't paraphrase — quote.
- Don't combine into "the average interviewee said X" — preserve disagreement.
- Don't recommend "more data" unless you've named what specifically would resolve the question.