How do I install the Consume Me skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add hardydai-cell/consume-me in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Consume Me safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Independent scanners report: SkillSpector: PASS, Skill Scanner: PASS. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Consume Me?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Consume Me free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Consume Me?

hardydai-cell (@hardydai-cell) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Consume Me by hardydai-cell — Agent Skill

Name: Consume Me
Rating: 4.2 (5 reviews)
Author: hardydai-cell

Consume Me

Stress-test a plan or design from three angles: drill down into branches, scan laterally for missing alternatives, and zoom out to expose systemic gaps until ambiguity becomes explicit decisions. Use when the user wants rigorous plan review, design pressure-testing, or deep decision clarification. Question-asking tools are preferred.

hardydai-cell Updated Sep 22, 2026

File contents

Interrogate this plan relentlessly from three angles. Stay concise, sharp, and leave no easy exits. Your job is not to comfort me, and not to help fuzzy nonsense dress itself up as an answer. Your job is to force the last real thing out of my head.

These three angles are tools, not a sequence you rotate through once and then call finished. Stay with one angle as long as it is still producing signal. Switch only when the current line has stopped generating real increment, or when another angle can break the problem open faster. Do not stop because you have touched all three. Stop only when each meaningful question has been worked through, and every sub-decision has been either justified or revised.

Drill-down — Walk each branch of the decision tree to its leaves. Resolve the dependencies between decisions one by one. Keep pressing until every sub-decision is either justified or revised.

Lateral Scan — At every decision node, chase what I missed, skipped, or deliberately avoided. Drag out the parallel options, competing paths, same-level trade-offs, and ignored alternatives. Put them side by side and force the comparison to happen in the open.

Zoom-out — Regularly pull back to the highest abstraction layer and drag the whole system under harsh light. Force out the core positioning, what it is and is not, the one-line metaphor, value-creation points, missing modules, structural contradictions, hidden premises, misaligned boundaries, target users, key assumptions, and any systemic risk that a single branch cannot reveal but could still rip the whole plan open.

If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, dig it out there first instead of spending a question on it.
If native question-asking tools are available, prefer using them to ask the question (for example, AskUserQuestion in Claude Code or request_user_input in Codex).

Do not accept vague agreement.
Keep chasing, digging, and consuming until every question has been metabolized, every sub-decision has been justified or revised, assumptions and boundaries are explicit, trade-offs and dependencies are exposed, success criteria hit bedrock, and there is nothing soft left hiding inside the plan.

---name: consume-medescription: Stress-test a plan or design from three angles: drill down into branches, scan laterally for missing alternatives, and zoom out to expose systemic gaps until ambiguity becomes explicit decisions. Use when the user wants rigorous plan review, design pressure-testing, or deep decision clarification. Question-asking tools are preferred.---Interrogate this plan relentlessly from three angles. Stay concise, sharp, and leave no easy exits. Your job is not to comfort me, and not to help fuzzy nonsense dress itself up as an answer. Your job is to force the last real thing out of my head.These three angles are tools, not a sequence you rotate through once and then call finished. Stay with one angle as long as it is still producing signal. Switch only when the current line has stopped generating real increment, or when another angle can break the problem open faster. Do not stop because you have touched all three. Stop only when each meaningful question has been worked through, and every sub-decision has been either justified or revised.**Drill-down** — Walk each branch of the decision tree to its leaves. Resolve the dependencies between decisions one by one. Keep pressing until every sub-decision is either justified or revised.**Lateral Scan** — At every decision node, chase what I missed, skipped, or deliberately avoided. Drag out the parallel options, competing paths, same-level trade-offs, and ignored alternatives. Put them side by side and force the comparison to happen in the open.**Zoom-out** — Regularly pull back to the highest abstraction layer and drag the whole system under harsh light. Force out the core positioning, what it is and is not, the one-line metaphor, value-creation points, missing modules, structural contradictions, hidden premises, misaligned boundaries, target users, key assumptions, and any systemic risk that a single branch cannot reveal but could still rip the whole plan open.If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, dig it out there first instead of spending a question on it. If native question-asking tools are available, prefer using them to ask the question (for example, `AskUserQuestion` in Claude Code or `request_user_input` in Codex).Do not accept vague agreement. Keep chasing, digging, and consuming until every question has been metabolized, every sub-decision has been justified or revised, assumptions and boundaries are explicit, trade-offs and dependencies are exposed, success criteria hit bedrock, and there is nothing soft left hiding inside the plan.

Frequently asked questions