Implement
Execute exactly one bounded experiment described by the resolved bead or caller
intent. Implement owns subject edits and factual evidence; the runtime derives
identity and receipts.
Prompt
Implement bead ag-1234 from its text: acceptance "ao gate check lists
skill.probe-coverage", scope cli/internal/gates/** plus regen outputs, first
check `cd cli && go test ./internal/gates/...`. RED first, smallest change,
return the manifest digest and check receipts, stop.
It's working if
- After source activation and startup association, the first behavior check
is the acceptance check; its output shows the expected failure (or an honest
green structural baseline for documentation, relocation, or refactor work).
- Every path in
git diff --stat falls inside the declared scope; an outside
consumer is reported as file:line, not absorbed.
- The response carries the
subject-manifest.v1 digest, author context ID,
and verbatim check output; no git commit or git push appears.
Workflow
- Read the intent, acceptance, and scope from their existing source; before
the first write, read
boundaries.md in the rpi skill's references
directory for what Implement does not own. Before execution can fail, the
caller passes source-store/project/work identity and permitted intent
locators at dispatch/start. At startup, return observed native runtime,
session/context identity (or explicit unknowns) through the caller-owned
runtime channel for native comments/metadata recording; do not defer this
association until handoff. Follow the fact distinctions in
session associations.
Parent and resume links need observed provenance; controller dispatch alone
does not establish native parentage. If startup observation or recording
fails, preserve that failure and the pre-execution reference with the caller,
leaving unobserved IDs unknown. Implement does not mutate the tracker.
- Run the declared first acceptance check before changing behavior. RED-first
applies when acceptance is behavioral: preserve evidence that the check
fails for the expected missing behavior. Relocations, doc merges, and pure
refactors record an honest green pre-change baseline instead.
- Make the smallest in-scope change that satisfies the active behavior.
- Run the targeted acceptance checks and capture factual results.
- Refactor only while those checks stay green. Refactoring does not change the
acceptance test.
- Have the runtime derive actual changed paths and
subject-manifest.v1 from
the before/after subject.
- Run
bash scripts/evidence-orphans.sh <changed paths> over the changed
paths the runtime derived, and put its output in the check receipts the
validator reads, so orphaned evidence arrives as a receipt rather than as a
surprise at verify time. Run it again after every repair round, over the
paths as they stand, because a repair can orphan evidence the first pass did
not. Read the output as written and never hand-list the orphans instead.
- Return the manifest digest, author context ID, and exact check receipts in the
response or runtime channel. Stop.
Specialists (standards, domain, test, refactor, security) advise only. During
edits, run the smallest deterministic checks that can falsify the change,
reuse exact-input receipts whose subject and tool identity still match, and
run the full suite at the integration boundary unless the intent makes it the
first check.
Scope conflict rule
On discovering a live consumer of the change outside the declared write scope
(a test asserting the old path, a generated twin, a gate reading the moved
file), stop and report the exact file and line to the caller, who may revise
the intent and start a separate invocation; a different acceptance contract
is a new intent.
Before declaring GREEN, self-audit the diff for mocks, placeholders, TODO
stubs, hardcoded fixture values, weakened assertions, regenerated goldens,
widened tolerances, suppression directives, or specification edits standing
in for real behavior. A changed test, gate, fixture, golden, or acceptance
source must be required by the original intent, with green coming from the
implemented behavior; a check that passes against a substitute or weakened
oracle is not evidence: finish the behavior or report it as not built.
Boundary
Do not commit, push, claim, close, release, land, reserve, retry, or invoke a
semantic validator. A failed check is evidence for the caller, not permission
to create a packet or validation loop.
1---2name: implement3description: Execute one bounded RED to GREEN experiment from bead or caller intent; return derived subject identity and check facts. Triggers: "implement", "implement this bead", "run the experiment". Full plan-to-validation requests route to rpi.4---5# Implement67Execute exactly one bounded experiment described by the resolved bead or caller8intent. Implement owns subject edits and factual evidence; the runtime derives9identity and receipts.1011## Prompt1213```text14Implement bead ag-1234 from its text: acceptance "ao gate check lists15skill.probe-coverage", scope cli/internal/gates/** plus regen outputs, first16check `cd cli && go test ./internal/gates/...`. RED first, smallest change,17return the manifest digest and check receipts, stop.18```1920## It's working if2122- After source activation and startup association, the first behavior check23 is the acceptance check; its output shows the expected failure (or an honest24 green structural baseline for documentation, relocation, or refactor work).25- Every path in `git diff --stat` falls inside the declared scope; an outside26 consumer is reported as `file:line`, not absorbed.27- The response carries the `subject-manifest.v1` digest, author context ID,28 and verbatim check output; no `git commit` or `git push` appears.2930## Workflow31321. Read the intent, acceptance, and scope from their existing source; before33 the first write, read `boundaries.md` in the rpi skill's `references`34 directory for what Implement does not own. Before execution can fail, the35 caller passes source-store/project/work identity and permitted intent36 locators at dispatch/start. At startup, return observed native runtime,37 session/context identity (or explicit unknowns) through the caller-owned38 runtime channel for native comments/metadata recording; do not defer this39 association until handoff. Follow the fact distinctions in40 [session associations](../cass/references/SESSION_FORMATS.md#work-to-session-associations).41 Parent and resume links need observed provenance; controller dispatch alone42 does not establish native parentage. If startup observation or recording43 fails, preserve that failure and the pre-execution reference with the caller,44 leaving unobserved IDs unknown. Implement does not mutate the tracker.452. Run the declared first acceptance check before changing behavior. RED-first46 applies when acceptance is behavioral: preserve evidence that the check47 fails for the expected missing behavior. Relocations, doc merges, and pure48 refactors record an honest green pre-change baseline instead.493. Make the smallest in-scope change that satisfies the active behavior.504. Run the targeted acceptance checks and capture factual results.515. Refactor only while those checks stay green. Refactoring does not change the52 acceptance test.536. Have the runtime derive actual changed paths and `subject-manifest.v1` from54 the before/after subject.557. Run `bash scripts/evidence-orphans.sh <changed paths>` over the changed56 paths the runtime derived, and put its output in the check receipts the57 validator reads, so orphaned evidence arrives as a receipt rather than as a58 surprise at verify time. Run it again after every repair round, over the59 paths as they stand, because a repair can orphan evidence the first pass did60 not. Read the output as written and never hand-list the orphans instead.618. Return the manifest digest, author context ID, and exact check receipts in the62 response or runtime channel. Stop.6364Specialists (standards, domain, test, refactor, security) advise only. During65edits, run the smallest deterministic checks that can falsify the change,66reuse exact-input receipts whose subject and tool identity still match, and67run the full suite at the integration boundary unless the intent makes it the68first check.6970## Scope conflict rule7172On discovering a live consumer of the change outside the declared write scope73(a test asserting the old path, a generated twin, a gate reading the moved74file), stop and report the exact file and line to the caller, who may revise75the intent and start a separate invocation; a different acceptance contract76is a new intent.7778Before declaring GREEN, self-audit the diff for mocks, placeholders, TODO79stubs, hardcoded fixture values, weakened assertions, regenerated goldens,80widened tolerances, suppression directives, or specification edits standing81in for real behavior. A changed test, gate, fixture, golden, or acceptance82source must be required by the original intent, with green coming from the83implemented behavior; a check that passes against a substitute or weakened84oracle is not evidence: finish the behavior or report it as not built.8586## Boundary8788Do not commit, push, claim, close, release, land, reserve, retry, or invoke a89semantic validator. A failed check is evidence for the caller, not permission90to create a packet or validation loop.