Submission Venue Selector

Submission Venue Selector

Use this skill to build an evidence-backed venue dossier for a scholarly draft. It can run a runtime helper that extracts references, builds candidate venues, collects or records related-paper evidence, scores fit, and writes journal recommendations with heuristic acceptance-chance intervals.

No Shallow Shortlist

A venue recommendation is deliverable only when each ranked venue has comparator-paper evidence. Bibliography overlap, venue reputation, and offline placeholders are discovery signals, not comparator-paper evidence. If this evidence is unavailable, output incomplete analysis, keep delivery status not-ready, and do not present a final ranked shortlist.

The final report must still list every candidate journal with an estimated acceptance-chance interval, confidence, calculation class, modifier breakdown, and caveats. These estimates are heuristics, not predictions or guarantees. Before writing a deliverable report, load writing-style-settings.md and record the active style profile. For mathematical, TCS, graph-theoretic, Lean, or LaTeX manuscripts, also load math-manuscript-style.md.

Routing Boundary

Use this skill for:

• "Where should I submit this draft?"
• journal or conference shortlist ranking
• validating an existing venue shortlist
• comparing venue fit against a draft and its bibliography

Do not use this skill for:

• draft rewriting or polishing; use draft-writing
• paper retrieval or downloads; use zotero and then getscipapers-requester
• general paper review; use paper-review or agent-group-discuss
• one-off venue facts that do not require a draft-fit dossier

Runtime Helper

POSIX:

bash "${AAS_RUNTIME_ROOT:-$HOME/.local/share/ai-agents-skills/runtime}/run_skill.sh" \
  skills/submission-venue-selector/run_submission_venue_selector.sh \
  run --dir /path/to/venue-run --draft /path/to/draft.tex --offline

This offline command is a smoke/provisional run. It is not a deliverable venue recommendation unless trusted fixture/cache comparator evidence is provided.

Windows PowerShell:

$runtime = if ($env:AAS_RUNTIME_ROOT) { $env:AAS_RUNTIME_ROOT } else { "$env:LOCALAPPDATA\ai-agents-skills\runtime" }
& "$runtime\run_skill.ps1" "skills/submission-venue-selector/run_submission_venue_selector.ps1" run --dir "$env:USERPROFILE\venue-run" --draft "$env:USERPROFILE\drafts\paper.tex" --offline

On Windows, use the PowerShell command above; CMD runtime entrypoints are not published.

Useful commands:

• init --dir <workspace> --draft <path>
• plan --dir <workspace>
• extract --dir <workspace>
• privacy-gate --dir <workspace>
• providers --check --dir <workspace>
• resolve --dir <workspace> [--allow-network --allow-provider <name>]
• expand --dir <workspace>
• venues --dir <workspace>
• recent --dir <workspace>
• score --dir <workspace>
• report --dir <workspace>
• validate --dir <workspace>
• run --dir <workspace> --draft <path> --offline for smoke/provisional output
• purge --dir <workspace>
• smoke

Safety Defaults

• Local/offline by default.
• Network requires a prior ok privacy-gate, --allow-network, and explicit --allow-provider <name>.
• Downloads, Zotero mutations, and Unpaywall email use are out of scope. The runtime refuses --allow-downloads, --allow-zotero-mutation, and --allow-unpaywall-email rather than acting on them; route downloads through zotero, then getscipapers-requester.
• Raw draft text is not persisted unless --retain-draft-text is used.
• Reports separate observed evidence from inferred venue fit and must mark placeholder-only output as incomplete analysis.
• Acceptance-chance estimates are required in reports, but bare percentages and predictive acceptance claims are invalid.
• Final report artifacts should record style_profile_ref, policy_hash, active_overlays, active_requirement_ids, and style_applied. A bare style_applied: true value is not enough unless the artifact or workflow ledger also records the loaded policy and selected requirements.

Workflow

1. Start with init or run.
2. Confirm privacy-gate before any live provider calls.
3. Use providers --check to record available provider capabilities.
4. Resolve references and derive candidate venues.
5. Score venues with criterion-level evidence IDs and acceptance-chance intervals.
6. Run validate before treating the recommendation as deliverable.

Read When Needed

• references/provider-policy.md: provider capabilities and network rules.
• references/artifact-schema.md: artifact files, IDs, and validation rules.
• references/scoring-rubric.md: scoring criteria and delivery statuses.
• references/report-contract.md: recommendation report structure.
• references/privacy-and-network-policy.md: draft privacy, cache, and mutation boundaries.