HoangNguyen0403 Penetration Testing Methodology (PTES-Aligned)
Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)
Always-Apply Rules
- No Exploit = No Report: Every finding requires reproducible Proof-of-Concept. Hypotheses without PoC are discarded.
- No Production Testing: All dynamic probes target local/staging only. Confirm authorization before Phase 1.
- No Single-Platform Bias: Assess backend, frontend, AND mobile surfaces when in-scope.
Workflow
Load alongside /pentest workflow. Provides methodology backbone for all 7 phases.
- Scope → Define test mode (whitebox/greybox/blackbox), platforms, exclusions.
- Recon → Build asset inventory per platform. See platform-recon.
- Threat Model → Rank endpoints by risk. See threat-modeling.
- Analyze → Run vulnerability matrix across all domains. Load
common-owasp,common-security-audit,common-dast-tooling. - Exploit → Validate each finding with PoC. See exploit-techniques.
- Post-Exploit → Assess blast radius, lateral movement, privilege escalation.
- Report → Audit-grade output with CVSS scoring. See report-template and compliance-mapping.
Platform Coverage Matrix
| Domain | Backend/API | Frontend/Web | Mobile (iOS/Android) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Injection | SQLi, CMDi, NoSQLi, LDAPi | Template injection, DOM sinks | Content provider SQLi, Intent injection |
| XSS | Response encoding | DOM XSS, innerHTML, framework bypasses |
WebView loadUrl, JavaScript bridges |
| Auth | JWT, OAuth, Session, MFA | Token storage, session management | Keychain/Keystore, biometric bypass |
| AuthZ | BOLA/IDOR, BFLA, Mass Assignment | Client-side role gates | Local permission checks without server |
| SSRF | HTTP client + user URL | SSR with user-supplied URL | Custom scheme fetching arbitrary URLs |
| Business Logic | Race conditions, workflow bypass | Client-only validation, price tamper | IAP bypass, receipt validation skip |
| Crypto | Weak hash, missing TLS | HTTP calls, weak CSP | Missing cert pin, cleartext traffic |
| Config | CORS, debug mode, headers | Source maps, debug flags in prod | debuggable=true, ATS exceptions |
| Deps/SCA | npm audit, pip-audit, cargo audit |
Bundle vuln analysis | pod audit, Gradle dependency scan |
| Secrets | Entropy + regex + liveness | Secrets in JS bundles | Keys in BuildConfig/Info.plist |
| LLM/AI | Prompt injection, excessive agency | Output to DOM sinks | Agent tools without confirmation |
Continuous & Compliance Execution
- Continuous Testing: Execute Delta scans on PRs or Replay regression PoCs. See continuous-pentest.
- Compliance Mapping: Map findings to SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, or OWASP MASVS. See compliance-mapping.
Anti-Patterns
- No "scan and dump": Raw tool output not a pentest. Correlate findings across SAST + DAST + manual.
- No severity inflation: Theoretical risk without exploit evidence ≠ confirmed vulnerability.
- No happy-path-only: Test error states, edge cases, race conditions, not just golden flow.
References
- Platform Reconnaissance — Phase 1 recon commands per platform
- Threat Modeling Guide — Phase 2 attack surface prioritization
- Exploit Techniques — Phase 4 PoC construction per vuln class
- Report Template — Phase 6 audit-grade report format
- OWASP Mobile Top 10 — Mobile vulnerability detection
- Compliance Mapping — SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS mapping
- Continuous Pentesting — CI/CD integration and Delta testing