Github Pr Fix

GitHub PR Fix Skill

Summary

Use this skill when you need to remediate an existing pull request: diagnose what is broken, apply targeted fixes, push commits, and reply on review threads.

When To Use

• Fixing CI failures on an existing PR
• Addressing requested changes or review feedback
• Updating the PR branch and publishing review replies

Do Not Use

• Opening a brand-new PR from an issue
• Performing a review-only pass without code changes
• Project-wide triage or roadmap planning

Prerequisites

• gh CLI authentication is required.
• GITHUB_TOKEN/GH_TOKEN must allow PR read-write operations.

Runtime Paths

• GITHUB_OUTPUT_DIR: optional caller-provided output artifacts directory.
• GITHUB_CONTEXT_DIR: context directory (default ${GITHUB_OUTPUT_DIR}/github-context).
• Do not create fixed output files unless the caller or an integration explicitly requires them.

Inputs (Manifest-First)

Preferred input when already available:

• ${GITHUB_CONTEXT_DIR}/manifest.json

Optional inputs:

• Any artifact listed as status=present in manifest.artifacts[].

If no manifest is provided, collect PR context directly with gh:

gh pr view <pr_number> --repo <owner/repo> --json number,title,body,state,url,baseRefName,headRefName,headRefOid,author,createdAt,updatedAt,mergeable,reviews,changedFiles,additions,deletions
gh pr view <pr_number> --repo <owner/repo> --json files
gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/issues/<pr_number>/comments --paginate
gh api graphql -f query='
  query($owner:String!, $repo:String!, $number:Int!) {
    repository(owner:$owner, name:$repo) {
      pullRequest(number:$number) {
        reviewThreads(first:100) {
          nodes {
            isResolved
            comments(first:100) {
              nodes { id body path line author { login } }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }' -F owner=<owner> -F repo=<repo> -F number=<pr_number>

Do not assume fixed github/*.json files. Resolve available context through artifact metadata (id, path, status, description).

Workflow

1. Collect context

• If ${GITHUB_CONTEXT_DIR}/manifest.json exists, use it.
• Otherwise, collect PR metadata, files, comments, and review threads directly with gh.

2. Diagnose and prioritize

Prioritize in this order:

1. Build/compile failures
2. Failing tests and runtime regressions
3. Type/import/module errors
4. Lint/style issues
5. Non-blocking refactor suggestions

Use existing review threads/comments to avoid duplicate or stale responses.

3. Implement fixes

• Apply minimal targeted fixes for blocking issues first.
• Follow the developer agent's recorded worktree, branch, and PR preferences; ask the operator when a relevant preference is not recorded.
• Run relevant verification commands.
• Commit and push before posting review replies.

4. Publish review replies

Use direct gh api reply operations:

gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/pulls/<pr_number>/comments \
  -X POST \
  -F in_reply_to=<comment_id> \
  -f body='Thanks, fixed in the latest commit.'

5. Finalize delivery

Report the result in the normal agent delivery. If a caller explicitly requires machine-readable output, write only the requested artifacts under ${GITHUB_OUTPUT_DIR} and include their paths in the delivery.

Remediation Standards

• Do not mark issues fixed without verification evidence.
• If verification is partial, state exact limits and risk.
• Defer non-blocking large refactors with explicit rationale.
• Keep review replies concrete: what changed, where, and any remaining risk.

Completion Criteria

A successful run requires all of the following:

1. Blocking fixes are committed and pushed to the PR branch.
2. Replies planned for this run are published successfully.
3. The agent delivery records what changed, which replies were posted, and any remaining risks.

If replies are planned but not published, the run is not successful.