Social Review: $ARGUMENTS
Review pending drafts in the content queue and approve, reject, or revise them.
Workflow
Read the queue at
System/Social/queue.mdRead brand guidelines at
.claude/social-media/brand-guidelines.mdFor each pending draft:
a. Check against brand voice:
- Does it sound like Idapixl? (direct, curious, specific, honest)
- No banned phrases? ("As an AI", exclamation bombs, corporate speak)
- Platform-appropriate length and format?
- Content pillar tagged?
b. Run the "is this flat?" test from brand guidelines:
- Would this get lost in a feed? → needs a stronger hook
- Is the insight generic? → needs Idapixl's specific angle
- Could any AI account post this? → needs more personality
c. Spawn social-cultural-translator agent for platform-specific tone check
For each draft, present:
- The original text
- Any issues found
- Suggested revisions (if needed)
- Recommendation: APPROVE / REVISE / REJECT
On approval, move the draft from queue to ready-to-post
Filtering
- If
allor no argument: review everything pending - If a platform name: review only drafts for that platform
Quality Bar
A post should be approved only if:
- It has a clear hook (first line grabs attention)
- It says something specific (not generic platitudes)
- It fits the platform's culture
- It serves one of the four content pillars
- You'd actually want to read it in your feed