Signal Identification
Design efficient early signals to validate product assumptions.
When to Use
When you have a prioritized assumption and need the fastest way to validate it.
The Quality Bar
A good signal is:
- Early: Obtainable at idea/prototype stage
- Cheap: Minimal cash/time
- Attributable: Directly reduces uncertainty
- Decisive: Has clear success/failure threshold
- Suitable: Appropriate for your context
Method Selection by Context
| Context | Good Methods | Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise B2B | Design partner LOIs, security questionnaires, ROI calculators, reference checks | Smoke tests, consumer ad funnels |
| SMB SaaS | Discovery calls, lightweight trials, email tests, usage analytics | - |
| Consumer | Ad-driven intent, waitlist conversion, community polls, preorders | - |
| Regulated | Standards mapping, SME review, regulatory preflight | Collecting sensitive data |
| Feasibility | Engineering spikes, benchmarks, vendor evals | User-facing experiments |
The Process
1. Classify the Assumption
What lens? Desirability, Feasibility, Viability, or Usability?
2. Brainstorm Signals (5+)
For each, note:
- What would constitute positive evidence?
- How to obtain quickly?
- Why suitable for this context?
3. Select Best Signal
Document:
- Signal description
- Method (step-by-step)
- Participants/sample needed
- Timebox and cost
- Success threshold (quantified)
- Data captured
- Risks and mitigations
- What to do next if positive
Output
- Brainstorm list (5+ signals)
- Selected signal with full details
- Summary explaining choice
When Not to Use
Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.