RLM (Recurrent Language Model) Module
🎯 Trigger Conditions
Use when deciding between RLM, ReAct, and ChainOfThought for tool use or multi-step reasoning.
📚 Prerequisites
dspypackage installed- Understanding of tool use patterns
- Clear reasoning requirements
🛠️ Module Comparison
1. ChainOfThought (CoT)
class CoTReasoning(dspy.Module):
def __init__(self):
self.reason = dspy.ChainOfThought("question -> reasoning -> answer")
def forward(self, question):
return self.reason(question=question)
When to use:
- Simple reasoning tasks
- No tool use required
- Single-step reasoning sufficient
2. ReAct (Reason + Act)
class ReActAgent(dspy.Module):
def __init__(self, tools):
self.react = dspy.ReAct(tools, max_steps=5)
def forward(self, question):
return self.react(question=question)
When to use:
- Tool use required
- Multi-step reasoning
- Dynamic decision making
3. RLM (Recurrent Language Model)
class RLMAgent(dspy.Module):
def __init__(self):
self.rlm = dspy.RLM(
signature=YourSignature,
n=3, # Number of recurrences
temperature=0.7
)
def forward(self, question):
return self.rlm(question=question)
When to use:
- Complex multi-step reasoning
- Iterative refinement needed
- High-quality output required
- Can afford compute cost
📊 Decision Matrix
| Pattern | Tool Use | Multi-Step | Quality | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoT | ❌ | ❌ | Good | Low |
| ReAct | ✅ | ✅ | Very Good | Medium |
| RLM | ✅ | ✅ | Excellent | High |
⚠️ Pitfalls
- RLM complexity: Can be overkill for simple tasks
- ReAct loops: Watch for infinite loops
- CoT depth: Limited to single reasoning step
- Compute budget: RLM requires significant resources