Dependency Architecture
Concept of the skill
Use when designing or auditing dependency structure: package boundaries, runtime vs build dependencies, adapter layers, duplicate-purpose libraries, supply-chain risk, upgrade policy, lock-in, and dependency graph health.
Coverage
Design and audit the dependency graph of a codebase. Covers direct vs transitive dependencies, runtime vs dev/build dependencies, package boundaries, import direction, adapter layers, duplicate-purpose libraries, lock-in, upgrade policy, supply-chain risk, and dependency drift.
Philosophy of the skill
Dependencies are architecture. Every package adds API surface, operational risk, update cost, and implicit design direction. A dependency that solves one task can still be wrong if it creates long-term coupling or duplicates an existing standard.
Prefer fewer, clearer dependencies with explicit ownership. Wrap volatile external SDKs at boundaries. Let application code depend on local contracts, not vendor shapes, when the vendor is likely to change or be replaced.
Method
- Inventory dependencies by purpose, owner, and import surface.
- Classify each as runtime, dev, build, test, or optional.
- Identify duplicate-purpose libraries and unauthorized standards.
- Check import direction and package boundary rules.
- Decide where adapters are needed for external SDKs or volatile APIs.
- Assess security, maintenance, license, and ecosystem health.
- Define upgrade, pinning, and removal policy.
Use the package manager and a graph tool to make the inventory observable before making architecture claims. In JavaScript/TypeScript, start with npm ls, pnpm why, yarn why, madge, or dependency-cruiser. In JVM systems, use Gradle/Maven dependency reports or jdeps. In Go, use go list -deps and go mod graph; in Rust, cargo tree; in Python, pipdeptree or lockfile inspection. Pair the generated graph with code search for imports at boundary seams, because manifest dependencies show what is installed while imports show what the architecture actually depends on.
Evals
This skill ships a comprehension-eval artifact at examples/evals/dependency-architecture.json. The checklist below is the authoring gate for dependency-boundary decisions; the eval file is the grader surface.
Verification
Do NOT Use When
| Use instead |
When |
framework-fit-analysis |
You are selecting a major framework, platform, runtime, or database. |
owasp-security |
The task is vulnerability-focused security review. |
refactor |
You are restructuring code without changing dependency architecture. |
architecture-decision-records |
The dependency decision is already made and needs a record. |
1---2name: dependency-architecture-23description: Use when designing or auditing dependency structure: package boundaries, runtime vs build dependencies, adapter layers, duplicate-purpose libraries, supply-chain risk, upgrade policy, lock-in, and dependency graph health. Do NOT use for choosing a major framework (use `framework-fit-analysis`), vulnerability-only review (use `owasp-security`), or routine refactoring without dependency boundary changes (use `refactor`).4license: MIT5---6# Dependency Architecture78## Concept of the skill910Use when designing or auditing dependency structure: package boundaries, runtime vs build dependencies, adapter layers, duplicate-purpose libraries, supply-chain risk, upgrade policy, lock-in, and dependency graph health.1112## Coverage1314Design and audit the dependency graph of a codebase. Covers direct vs transitive dependencies, runtime vs dev/build dependencies, package boundaries, import direction, adapter layers, duplicate-purpose libraries, lock-in, upgrade policy, supply-chain risk, and dependency drift.1516## Philosophy of the skill17Dependencies are architecture. Every package adds API surface, operational risk, update cost, and implicit design direction. A dependency that solves one task can still be wrong if it creates long-term coupling or duplicates an existing standard.1819Prefer fewer, clearer dependencies with explicit ownership. Wrap volatile external SDKs at boundaries. Let application code depend on local contracts, not vendor shapes, when the vendor is likely to change or be replaced.2021## Method22231. Inventory dependencies by purpose, owner, and import surface.242. Classify each as runtime, dev, build, test, or optional.253. Identify duplicate-purpose libraries and unauthorized standards.264. Check import direction and package boundary rules.275. Decide where adapters are needed for external SDKs or volatile APIs.286. Assess security, maintenance, license, and ecosystem health.297. Define upgrade, pinning, and removal policy.3031Use the package manager and a graph tool to make the inventory observable before making architecture claims. In JavaScript/TypeScript, start with `npm ls`, `pnpm why`, `yarn why`, `madge`, or dependency-cruiser. In JVM systems, use Gradle/Maven dependency reports or `jdeps`. In Go, use `go list -deps` and `go mod graph`; in Rust, `cargo tree`; in Python, `pipdeptree` or lockfile inspection. Pair the generated graph with code search for imports at boundary seams, because manifest dependencies show what is installed while imports show what the architecture actually depends on.3233## Evals3435This skill ships a comprehension-eval artifact at [`examples/evals/dependency-architecture.json`](https://github.com/jacob-balslev/skill-graph/blob/main/examples/evals/dependency-architecture.json). The checklist below is the authoring gate for dependency-boundary decisions; the eval file is the grader surface.3637## Verification3839- [ ] Each dependency has a purpose and owner40- [ ] Runtime dependencies are not hidden as dev/build dependencies41- [ ] Duplicate-purpose packages are justified or removed42- [ ] External SDKs do not leak vendor types across core boundaries without intent43- [ ] Package import direction is enforceable44- [ ] Upgrade policy and lockfile discipline are clear45- [ ] Security and license risks have been checked for high-impact dependencies4647## Do NOT Use When4849| Use instead | When |50|---|---|51| `framework-fit-analysis` | You are selecting a major framework, platform, runtime, or database. |52| `owasp-security` | The task is vulnerability-focused security review. |53| `refactor` | You are restructuring code without changing dependency architecture. |54| `architecture-decision-records` | The dependency decision is already made and needs a record. |