Codex CLI
Delegate coding tasks to Codex via the Hermes terminal. Codex is OpenAI's autonomous coding agent CLI.
When to use
- Building features
- Refactoring
- PR reviews
- Batch issue fixing
Requires the codex CLI and a git repository.
Prerequisites
- Codex installed:
npm install -g @openai/codex - OpenAI auth configured: either
OPENAI_API_KEYor Codex OAuth credentials from the Codex CLI login flow - Must run inside a git repository — Codex refuses to run outside one
- Use
pty=truein terminal calls — Codex is an interactive terminal app
For Hermes itself, model.provider: openai-codex uses Hermes-managed Codex
OAuth from ~/.hermes/auth.json after hermes auth add openai-codex. For the
standalone Codex CLI, a valid CLI OAuth session may live under
~/.codex/auth.json; do not treat a missing OPENAI_API_KEY alone as proof
that Codex auth is missing.
One-Shot Tasks
terminal(command="codex exec 'Add dark mode toggle to settings'", workdir="~/project", pty=true)
For scratch work (Codex needs a git repo):
terminal(command="cd $(mktemp -d) && git init && codex exec 'Build a snake game in Python'", pty=true)
Background Mode (Long Tasks)
# Start in background with PTY
terminal(command="codex exec --sandbox workspace-write 'Refactor the auth module'", workdir="~/project", background=true, pty=true)
# Returns session_id
# Monitor progress
process(action="poll", session_id="<id>")
process(action="log", session_id="<id>")
# Send input if Codex asks a question
process(action="submit", session_id="<id>", data="yes")
# Kill if needed
process(action="kill", session_id="<id>")
Key Flags
| Flag | Effect |
|---|---|
exec "prompt" |
One-shot execution, exits when done |
--sandbox workspace-write (-s) |
Sandboxed but auto-approves file changes in the workspace (the recommended auto-build mode) |
--dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox |
No sandbox, no approvals (fastest, most dangerous; --yolo still works as a hidden alias) |
--sandbox danger-full-access |
No Codex sandbox; useful when the host service context breaks bubblewrap |
Deprecated:
--full-autostill works but the live CLI warns to use--sandbox workspace-writeinstead.
Hermes Gateway Caveat
When invoking the Codex CLI from a Hermes gateway/service context (for example,
Telegram-driven agent sessions), Codex workspace-write sandboxing may fail even
when the same command works in the user's interactive shell. A typical symptom is
bubblewrap/user-namespace errors such as setting up uid map: Permission denied
or loopback: Failed RTM_NEWADDR: Operation not permitted.
In that context, prefer:
codex exec --sandbox danger-full-access "<task>"
Use process boundaries as the safety layer instead: explicit workdir, clean git
status before launch, narrow task prompts, git diff review, targeted tests, and
human/agent confirmation before committing broad changes.
PR Reviews
Clone to a temp directory for safe review:
terminal(command="REVIEW=$(mktemp -d) && git clone https://github.com/user/repo.git $REVIEW && cd $REVIEW && gh pr checkout 42 && codex review --base origin/main", pty=true)
Parallel Issue Fixing with Worktrees
# Create worktrees
terminal(command="git worktree add -b fix/issue-78 /tmp/issue-78 main", workdir="~/project")
terminal(command="git worktree add -b fix/issue-99 /tmp/issue-99 main", workdir="~/project")
# Launch Codex in each
terminal(command="codex --sandbox workspace-write exec 'Fix issue #78: <description>. Commit when done.'", workdir="/tmp/issue-78", background=true, pty=true)
terminal(command="codex --sandbox workspace-write exec 'Fix issue #99: <description>. Commit when done.'", workdir="/tmp/issue-99", background=true, pty=true)
# Monitor
process(action="list")
# After completion, push and create PRs
terminal(command="cd /tmp/issue-78 && git push -u origin fix/issue-78")
terminal(command="gh pr create --repo user/repo --head fix/issue-78 --title 'fix: ...' --body '...'")
# Cleanup
terminal(command="git worktree remove /tmp/issue-78", workdir="~/project")
Batch PR Reviews
# Fetch all PR refs
terminal(command="git fetch origin '+refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr/*'", workdir="~/project")
# Review multiple PRs in parallel
terminal(command="codex exec 'Review PR #86. git diff origin/main...origin/pr/86'", workdir="~/project", background=true, pty=true)
terminal(command="codex exec 'Review PR #87. git diff origin/main...origin/pr/87'", workdir="~/project", background=true, pty=true)
# Post results
terminal(command="gh pr comment 86 --body '<review>'", workdir="~/project")
Rules
- Always use
pty=true— Codex is an interactive terminal app and hangs without a PTY - Git repo required — Codex won't run outside a git directory. Use
mktemp -d && git initfor scratch - Use
execfor one-shots —codex exec "prompt"runs and exits cleanly --sandbox workspace-writefor building — auto-approves changes within the sandbox (--full-autois deprecated for this)- Background for long tasks — use
background=trueand monitor withprocesstool - Don't interfere — monitor with
poll/log, be patient with long-running tasks - Parallel is fine — run multiple Codex processes at once for batch work
§Queen 协同协议 (v29.0)
何时被 Queen 派
- SOUL §舰队表 L141: 写功能 / 修 bug / PR — 默认 worker
- 写代码路径首选;Queen 决策树 §1 "简单/确定" 也可能直跑不派
Queen 派单时该传什么
goal: 实现描述 (e.g. "实现 X 功能, 改 src/foo.py:10")context: file:line 引用 + 期望行为 (不要 paste 完整文件, 派单 §硬规则 L5)execution_mode: "write" 默认; 调研任务用 "read_only"- 隔离边界 (派单 §硬规则 L4): workdir: ; writable: []; forbidden: [<abs path|glob>]
该期待什么产出
summary.md: 改了哪些文件 + 验证结果status.json#exit_code: 0=绿, 非0=红--json -o <last-message>自动落 review artifact (per SOUL §舰队表 L141 注释)
沙箱边界
read_only:-s read-only— 只读 + 跑测试, 不能改文件write:-s workspace-write— 默认, 项目内可写- v28.3+ plan.sandbox 字段 enforce:
fs:strict/fs:loose都映射 workspace-write;fs:read-only映射 read-only
Verify 责任分工
- worker 跑 Queen 在 task 里给的
verification_command, 报 exit code - Queen 复核 exit code 不重跑 (派单 §硬规则 L2)
升级触发器
- codex → claude-code: 上下文 >50k token, 或前一轮 verify 红 + 调试需架构权衡
- codex → pi: 通常不升级, codex 已是写代码最优
- 默认不走降级 (codex 写不了才降级 pi/opencode 调研)
Abort / 打断规则 (SOUL §打断处理)
- 用户插话引用 task_id/file: → 立即 abort, 改动丢弃 (默认)
- 用户插话改 goal → Queen 重派, 不修改当前 task
- abort 半成品: 还没写文件 → 安全; 正在写 → 留垃圾 → Queen 后续 git status 检查
与其他 worker 接力
- codex 写完 → 通常接 opencode L2 review (per queen-dispatch/SKILL.md L200-209 review-gate)
- HIGH risk → 接 pi L3 review
- 接力时 context 必传: codex 改了哪些文件 + 验证结果