Jason-hub-star Converge Plan
Use this before implementation, not as a generic review after code exists.
Workflow
- Freeze a small rubric before round one. Suggested dimensions: feasibility, evidence, gap coverage, differentiation, cost realism, and falsifiability.
- For each round: improve the largest weakness, score with evidence, attempt to refute the improvement, then record surviving new defects.
- Stop after two consecutive rounds with no new surviving defect, two rounds with less than 5% improvement, or a hard cap of 6–8 rounds.
- Do not declare convergence without at least one primary-source comparison and one direct check of the real system when those are available.
Output
- Frozen rubric and score trajectory
- Accepted plan changes and rejected alternatives
- One irreversible crux
- One cheapest falsifiable experiment
- Stop reason and remaining uncertainty
Do not change the rubric mid-run or accept an improvement without trying to disprove it.
Next
Turn the converged outcome into goal-contract. If the crux is unresolved, run only the cheapest experiment first.