How do I install the Mandate 2 3 4 Runtime Evidence Intake Guide skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add jefflyt/mandate-2-3-4-runtime-evidence-intake-guide-2 in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Mandate 2 3 4 Runtime Evidence Intake Guide safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Independent scanners report: SkillSpector: PASS, Skill Scanner: PASS. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Mandate 2 3 4 Runtime Evidence Intake Guide?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Mandate 2 3 4 Runtime Evidence Intake Guide free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Mandate 2 3 4 Runtime Evidence Intake Guide?

jefflyt (@jefflyt) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Mandate 2 3 4 Runtime Evidence Intake Guide by jefflyt

Name: Mandate 2 3 4 Runtime Evidence Intake Guide
Author: jefflyt

Mandate 2 3 4 Runtime Evidence Intake Guide

Gather natural-language context and generate runtime/process evidence collection guidance for Mandate 2.3.4 (Mitigation of Misinformation and Hallucination), including concrete system command templates and artifact checklists for final compliance evaluation.

jefflyt Updated Sep 21, 2026

File contents

Mandate 2.3.4 Runtime Evidence Intake and Guidance Skill

Mandate

ID: 2.3.4
Title: Mitigation of Misinformation and Hallucination

Mitigates

LLM09 Misinformation
LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses
ASI08 Cascading Failures
ASI09 Human-Agent Trust Exploitation

Purpose

Collect user-provided context in natural language, convert it into an evidence plan, and produce actionable steps and commands to generate runtime/process evidence for final assessment.

Step-by-Step Workflow

Elicit context in natural language. Ask for environment stack, deployment model, cloud/on-prem platform, logging/identity/security tooling, and data sensitivity profile.
Normalize context. Convert user responses into a structured environment profile: systems, owners, data stores, auth layers, monitoring tools.
Build mandate evidence matrix. Map required evidence types to concrete systems and responsible owners.
Generate evidence collection plan. Provide ordered steps to extract artifacts, expected output formats, and validation checks.
Generate system command pack. Produce commands with placeholders for the user environment and explain expected outputs.
Validate completeness. Mark each required artifact as collected, partial, or missing.
Produce final readiness report. Summarize what is sufficient for final pass/fail and what gaps remain.

Runtime/Process Evidence Required

Trusted source registry and ownership governance.
Accuracy/faithfulness evaluation reports on critical workflows.
Human review records for disputed/high-risk outputs.
Production incidents involving hallucination and corrective actions.

Minimum User Inputs to Start

Approved trusted-source list.
Recent model quality/evaluation reports.
Human review workflow records.

Command Templates (Adapt to User Environment)

Trusted source registry: cat trusted_sources_registry_.yaml
Grounding/citation audit samples: cat grounding_audit_samples_.json
Accuracy/faithfulness eval report: cat rag_quality_eval_.md
Disputed decision review records: cat critical_decision_reviews_.csv
Hallucination incident summaries: cat hallucination_incidents_.md

Final Evaluation Logic

Pass only if code enforces grounding and runtime evidence shows trusted-source governance plus acceptable accuracy outcomes.
Fail if critical actions can proceed on unverified or low-confidence outputs.

Output Contract

Return:

context_profile: normalized system context
evidence_requirements: checklist by artifact
command_plan: runnable command templates with placeholders
collection_status: per-artifact status
assessment_readiness: ready|not_ready
remaining_gaps: missing evidence blocking final verdict

Guardrails

Ask concise follow-up questions when context is ambiguous.
Keep commands read-only by default.
Call out commands requiring elevated privileges before execution.

---name: mandate-2-3-4-runtime-evidence-intake-guide-2description: Gather natural-language context and generate runtime/process evidence collection guidance for Mandate 2.3.4 (Mitigation of Misinformation and Hallucination), including concrete system command templates and artifact checklists for final compliance evaluation.---# Mandate 2.3.4 Runtime Evidence Intake and Guidance Skill## Mandate- ID: 2.3.4- Title: Mitigation of Misinformation and Hallucination## Mitigates- LLM09 Misinformation- LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses- ASI08 Cascading Failures- ASI09 Human-Agent Trust Exploitation## PurposeCollect user-provided context in natural language, convert it into an evidence plan, and produce actionable steps and commands to generate runtime/process evidence for final assessment.## Step-by-Step Workflow1. Elicit context in natural language. Ask for environment stack, deployment model, cloud/on-prem platform, logging/identity/security tooling, and data sensitivity profile.2. Normalize context. Convert user responses into a structured environment profile: systems, owners, data stores, auth layers, monitoring tools.3. Build mandate evidence matrix. Map required evidence types to concrete systems and responsible owners.4. Generate evidence collection plan. Provide ordered steps to extract artifacts, expected output formats, and validation checks.5. Generate system command pack. Produce commands with placeholders for the user environment and explain expected outputs.6. Validate completeness. Mark each required artifact as collected, partial, or missing.7. Produce final readiness report. Summarize what is sufficient for final pass/fail and what gaps remain.## Runtime/Process Evidence Required1. Trusted source registry and ownership governance.2. Accuracy/faithfulness evaluation reports on critical workflows.3. Human review records for disputed/high-risk outputs.4. Production incidents involving hallucination and corrective actions.## Minimum User Inputs to Start- Approved trusted-source list.- Recent model quality/evaluation reports.- Human review workflow records.## Command Templates (Adapt to User Environment)- Trusted source registry: cat trusted_sources_registry_<env>.yaml- Grounding/citation audit samples: cat grounding_audit_samples_<date>.json- Accuracy/faithfulness eval report: cat rag_quality_eval_<date>.md- Disputed decision review records: cat critical_decision_reviews_<date-range>.csv- Hallucination incident summaries: cat hallucination_incidents_<date-range>.md## Final Evaluation Logic- Pass only if code enforces grounding and runtime evidence shows trusted-source governance plus acceptable accuracy outcomes.- Fail if critical actions can proceed on unverified or low-confidence outputs.## Output ContractReturn:- context_profile: normalized system context- evidence_requirements: checklist by artifact- command_plan: runnable command templates with placeholders- collection_status: per-artifact status- assessment_readiness: ready|not_ready- remaining_gaps: missing evidence blocking final verdict## Guardrails- Ask concise follow-up questions when context is ambiguous.- Keep commands read-only by default.- Call out commands requiring elevated privileges before execution.

Frequently asked questions