Stakeholder Simulator
Get feedback from simulated CTO, UX, Sales, Executive, and User Advocate perspectives.
Output
Save to launch/outputs/stakeholder-sim-[YYYY-MM-DD].md
When to Use This Skill
- Pressure-testing a PRD before review meetings
- Anticipating concerns from specific stakeholders
- Preparing for exec presentations
What You'll Need
Critical inputs (ask if not provided):
- The document to review (PRD, proposal, one-pager)
- Which stakeholder perspectives to simulate
Nice-to-have inputs:
- Specific concerns you're worried about
- Context on your organization's dynamics
Process
Step 1: Check Your Context
First, read the user's context files:
context/company.md— Team structure, who are the real stakeholders?context/product.md— Current priorities, technical constraintscontext/personas.md— User context that stakeholders will ask aboutcontext/competitors.md— Competitive context that Sales/Execs will raise
Tell the user what you found. For example:
"I found your org structure in company.md — you have a CTO (Maya), Head of Sales (Alex), and CPO (Jordan). I'll simulate their perspectives based on their known priorities. I also found competitive pressure from Monday.com in competitors.md — Sales will likely ask about differentiation."
Step 2: Submit Document
Provide the full document you want reviewed. If context files have relevant background, mention:
"I'll use your personas.md to inform User Advocate feedback and your competitors.md to inform Sales perspective."
Step 2: Select Perspectives
Choose which stakeholders to simulate:
- CTO/Tech Lead: Technical feasibility, architecture
- UX Lead: User experience, design, usability
- Sales Lead: Market fit, competitive positioning
- Executive: Strategy, ROI, prioritization
- User Advocate: Customer needs, adoption
Step 3: Generate Reviews
Each persona reviews with their priorities and concerns.
Step 4: Identify Patterns
- Where do perspectives align?
- Where do they conflict?
- What questions should you prepare for?
Output Template
# Stakeholder Review: [Document Name]
**Document Type:** PRD / Proposal / One-Pager
**Review Date:** [Date]
## Context
*What I found in your files:*
- **Org structure:** [From company.md — key stakeholders]
- **Current priorities:** [From company.md — what leadership cares about]
- **User context:** [From personas.md — user needs they'll ask about]
- **Competitive context:** [From competitors.md — positioning questions]
## Summary
- **Consensus:** [Where everyone agrees]
- **Tensions:** [Where perspectives conflict]
- **Top Questions to Prepare For:** [List]
---
## CTO / Tech Lead Review
**Overall:** 🟢 Supportive / 🟡 Concerns / 🔴 Blocker
**Likes:**
- [Positive 1]
- [Positive 2]
**Concerns:**
- [Concern 1] — "How will this affect [X]?"
- [Concern 2]
**Questions to Expect:**
- "[Question 1]"
- "[Question 2]"
**Suggestions:**
- [Recommendation 1]
---
## UX Lead Review
**Overall:** 🟢 Supportive / 🟡 Concerns / 🔴 Blocker
[Same structure]
---
## Sales Lead Review
**Overall:** 🟢 Supportive / 🟡 Concerns / 🔴 Blocker
[Same structure]
---
## Executive Review
**Overall:** 🟢 Supportive / 🟡 Concerns / 🔴 Blocker
[Same structure]
---
## User Advocate Review
**Overall:** 🟢 Supportive / 🟡 Concerns / 🔴 Blocker
[Same structure]
---
## Synthesis
### Where They Agree
- [Consensus point 1]
### Where They Conflict
| Issue | Perspective A | Perspective B |
|-------|--------------|---------------|
| [Issue] | [View] | [Opposing view] |
### Prepare For These Questions
1. [Question] — From: [Stakeholder]
2. [Question] — From: [Stakeholder]
Framework Reference
Multi-perspective stakeholder analysis:
- Different roles have different priorities
- Surface concerns before the meeting
- Prepare answers in advance
Tips for Best Results
- Use your context files — I'll ground stakeholder perspectives in your real org, not generic personas
- Provide the full document — Partial docs get partial feedback
- Note specific concerns — If you're worried about technical pushback, tell me
- Prepare for conflicts — The value is in surfacing tensions before the meeting
- Practice your answers — Use the expected questions as a rehearsal script
Stakeholder Calibration
If your real stakeholders have specific priorities different from generic roles:
"My CTO cares most about platform scalability. My Sales lead is focused on enterprise deals."
I'll adjust the simulation to match your organization.
Related Workflows
Need the full 7-perspective parallel review? /multi-review runs all perspectives simultaneously. (available in the full PM OS)