Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models
One-line decision
Use this skill when you want to understand how to scale instruction fine-tuning across number of tasks, model size, and chain-of-thought data for maximum benefit. Avoid it when you are doing single-task fine-tuning.
Skill metadata
- Skill type: instruction-finetuning-at-scale
- Paper kind: operational-method
- Actionability: high
- Evidence quality: full_paper
Goal
Study the scaling behavior of instruction fine-tuning (Flan) across three dimensions: number of tasks, model size, and inclusion of chain-of-thought data, providing guidance for optimal instruction tuning at scale.
Problem signature
- Modality: text instruction data across 1,836 tasks.
- Data state: 1,836 tasks formatted as instructions with optional chain-of-thought.
- Scale regime: 1,836 tasks scaling up to 540B parameters.
- Model requirement: PaLM models at various scales for scaling studies.
Use when
- You want to understand instruction tuning scaling laws.
- You are designing a multi-task instruction tuning recipe.
- You want to add chain-of-thought data to instruction tuning.
Do not use when
- You are doing single-task fine-tuning.
- You have a fixed, small instruction dataset.
- You cannot run scaling experiments.
Required inputs
- task_collection: 1,836 tasks formatted as instructions.
- scaling_models: Models at multiple scales for ablation.
- cot_data: Chain-of-thought data for selected tasks.
Optional inputs
- task_mixing: Mixing ratios across task categories.
Outputs
- scaling_insights: Insights on instruction tuning scaling behavior.
- flan_palm: Instruction-tuned PaLM models.
Assumptions and prerequisites
- More tasks improve instruction-following generalization.
- Larger models benefit more from instruction tuning.
- Chain-of-thought data improves reasoning capabilities.
Procedure
- Aggregate 1,836 tasks Action: Collect and format 1,836 tasks as instruction-response pairs. Why: Massive task diversity improves generalization. Note: See paper for details.
- Add chain-of-thought data Action: Include step-by-step reasoning for 9 tasks. Why: CoT data teaches reasoning process. Note: See paper for details.
- Scale across dimensions Action: Vary number of tasks, model size, and CoT inclusion. Why: Systematic scaling reveals optimal configurations. Note: See paper for details.
- Evaluate generalization Action: Test on held-out tasks and benchmarks. Why: Measures instruction-following generalization. Note: See paper for details.
Parameters to set
- num_tasks — Role: Number of instruction tasks. How to set: As many as available. Default/range: 1836. Effect: More tasks improve generalization.
- model_scale — Role: Model parameter count. How to set: Larger models benefit more. Default/range: 8B-540B. Effect: Larger models show bigger gains from instruction tuning.
- cot_inclusion — Role: Whether to include chain-of-thought data. How to set: Include CoT for reasoning tasks. Default/range: 9 CoT tasks. Effect: CoT significantly improves reasoning.
Validation checks
- More tasks should improve held-out task performance.
- Larger models should show bigger gains from instruction tuning.
- CoT data should improve reasoning benchmarks.
Failure modes
- Too many low-quality tasks may dilute training signal.
- Task mixing ratios need careful tuning.
- CoT benefits may be limited to reasoning-specific tasks.
Adaptation notes for VLM training
- Flan's scaling insights apply to VLM instruction tuning.
- Include CoT data for VLM reasoning improvement.
- The task diversity principle applies to multimodal instruction data.
Implementation notes
- Use Flan templates for instruction formatting.
- Balance task sampling during training.
- Track per-task performance for analysis.
Evidence from the paper
- Scaling instruction tuning to 1,836 tasks significantly improves generalization.
- Larger models benefit more from instruction tuning.
- Chain-of-thought data substantially improves reasoning capabilities.
- Flan-PaLM 540B achieves state-of-the-art on multiple benchmarks.
Source paper
- Title: Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models
- Year: 2022
- Venue: JMLR
- Paper ID: arxiv-2210.11416v5
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11416v5
- arXiv ID: 2210.11416v5