Scaling Laws For Neural Language Models Arxiv 2001 08361v1

Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

One-line decision

Use this skill when you want to understand power-law relationships between model size, data size, and compute for optimal resource allocation. Avoid it when you are not making scaling decisions.

Skill metadata

• Skill type: neural-scaling-laws
• Paper kind: operational-method
• Actionability: high
• Evidence quality: full_paper

Goal

Establish power-law scaling relationships between language model performance and three factors: model size, dataset size, and compute budget, providing guidance for optimal resource allocation.

Problem signature

• Modality: text data scaling analysis; principles apply to multimodal.
• Data state: training data at various scales for scaling studies.
• Scale regime: millions to billions of tokens.
• Model requirement: Transformer models at various scales.

Use when

• You are making scaling decisions about data vs model size.
• You want to predict performance at larger scales.
• You need to optimize resource allocation.

Do not use when

• You are not making scaling decisions.
• Your task does not follow power-law scaling.
• You have fixed resources without flexibility.

Required inputs

• training_data: Data at various scales.
• model_variants: Models at multiple sizes.
• compute_budget: Available compute for scaling studies.

Optional inputs

• downstream_tasks: Tasks for evaluating scaling predictions.

Outputs

• scaling_laws: Power-law relationships between performance and resources.
• optimal_allocation: Recommended split between model size and data.

Assumptions and prerequisites

• Performance follows power-law relationships with scale.
• Scaling laws are consistent across model families.
• Small-scale experiments predict large-scale behavior.

Procedure

1. Train at multiple scales Action: Train models at various data and model sizes. Why: Empirical data for fitting scaling laws. Note: See paper for details.
2. Fit power laws Action: Fit power-law functions to the results. Why: Mathematical relationships enable prediction. Note: See paper for details.
3. Derive compute-optimal allocation Action: Find the optimal model/data split for a given compute budget. Why: Optimizes resource allocation. Note: See paper for details.
4. Validate at larger scale Action: Verify predictions hold at larger scales. Why: Ensures extrapolation accuracy. Note: See paper for details.

Parameters to set

• model_range — Role: Range of model sizes tested. How to set: 6 orders of magnitude. Default/range: 1M-1B parameters. Effect: Wider range improves law accuracy.
• data_range — Role: Range of data sizes tested. How to set: 3 orders of magnitude. Default/range: 1M-1B tokens. Effect: Wider range captures scaling behavior.

Validation checks

• Power laws should fit the empirical data well.
• Predictions should hold at larger scales.
• Compute-optimal allocations should improve efficiency.

Failure modes

• Scaling laws may break at very large scales.
• Different architectures may have different laws.
• Quality-dependent effects may not be captured.

Adaptation notes for VLM training

• Scaling laws guide VLM data collection and model sizing decisions.
• Apply to multimodal scaling: vision encoder, LLM, and data.
• Consider data quality effects on scaling (Chinchilla, D4).

Implementation notes

• Use logarithmic axes for power-law fitting.
• Run experiments at cleanly separated scales.
• Report confidence intervals on scaling law parameters.

Evidence from the paper

• Performance follows power-law relationships with model size, data size, and compute.
• Scaling laws enable accurate prediction of performance at larger scales.
• Compute-optimal allocation splits resources between model and data size.
• These laws have shaped the development of modern LLMs and VLMs.

Source paper

• Title: Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
• Year: 2020
• Venue: arXiv
• Paper ID: arxiv-2001.08361v1
• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361v1
• arXiv ID: 2001.08361v1