Scaling Vision With Sparse Mixture Of Experts Arxiv 2106 05974v1

Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Experts

One-line decision

Use this skill when you want to scale vision models efficiently using sparse Mixture-of-Experts for handling more training data per compute. Avoid it when dense models are sufficient for your scale.

Skill metadata

• Skill type: sparse-moe-vision-training
• Paper kind: operational-method
• Actionability: medium
• Evidence quality: full_paper

Goal

Scale vision models efficiently using sparse Mixture-of-Experts, where only a subset of parameters is active per image, enabling processing of more data per unit of compute.

Problem signature

• Modality: images processed by sparse MoE vision models.
• Data state: large-scale image data processed with sparse computation.
• Scale regime: JFT-300M and larger datasets.
• Model requirement: ViT with sparse MoE layers.

Use when

• You want to scale vision models efficiently.
• You need more capacity without proportional compute increase.
• MoE architecture is feasible for your setup.

Do not use when

• Dense models are sufficient.
• MoE adds too much complexity.
• You cannot handle MoE routing challenges.

Required inputs

• large_image_data: Large-scale image data for training.
• moe_architecture: ViT with sparse MoE layers.
• routing_mechanism: Router for selecting expert subsets.

Optional inputs

• expert_balancing: Loss for balancing expert usage.

Outputs

• moe_vision_model: Sparse MoE vision model.
• efficient_features: Visual features from efficient sparse computation.

Assumptions and prerequisites

• Sparse computation enables larger models per compute unit.
• Expert specialization improves efficiency.
• MoE scaling follows favorable laws.

Procedure

1. Add MoE layers to ViT Action: Replace FFN layers with MoE layers. Why: MoE enables sparse scaling. Note: See paper for details.
2. Train with routing Action: Train with expert routing and load balancing. Why: Routing selects relevant experts per input. Note: See paper for details.
3. Scale to large data Action: Train on JFT-300M or larger. Why: MoE benefits from large-scale training. Note: See paper for details.
4. Evaluate efficiency Action: Compare to dense models at equal compute. Why: Validates MoE efficiency advantage. Note: See paper for details.

Parameters to set

• num_experts — Role: Number of experts per MoE layer. How to set: 32-128. Default/range: 32. Effect: More experts provide more capacity.
• top_k — Role: Experts selected per input. How to set: 1-2. Default/range: 2. Effect: More selected experts increase compute.

Validation checks

• MoE should outperform dense models at equal compute.
• Expert usage should be balanced.
• Scaling should follow favorable laws.

Failure modes

• Expert routing may be suboptimal.
• Load imbalance across experts.
• MoE adds engineering complexity.

Adaptation notes for VLM training

• MoE vision models provide efficient encoding for VLMs.
• Sparse computation enables larger models on the same hardware.
• MoE is a direction for scaling VLM vision components.

Implementation notes

• Implement efficient expert routing.
• Balance expert loads during training.
• Compare to dense baselines at equal FLOPs.

Evidence from the paper

• Sparse MoE enables efficient scaling of vision models.
• V-MoE processes more data per compute unit than dense models.
• Expert specialization improves efficiency.
• MoE scaling is favorable for large-scale vision.

Source paper

• Title: Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of Experts
• Year: 2022
• Venue: NeurIPS
• Paper ID: arxiv-2106.05974v1
• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05974v1
• arXiv ID: 2106.05974v1