Snli Ve Visual Entailment Dataset Arxiv 1901 06706v1

SNLI-VE: Visual Entailment Dataset

One-line decision

Use this skill when you need a visual entailment dataset where the model must determine if a text hypothesis is entailed, contradicted, or neutral with respect to an image premise. Avoid it when you do not need visual entailment or NLI-style evaluation.

Skill metadata

• Skill type: visual-entailment-data
• Paper kind: operational-method
• Actionability: high
• Evidence quality: full_paper

Goal

Create a visual entailment dataset by adapting SNLI text entailment to the visual domain, where an image serves as the premise and the model determines entailment, contradiction, or neutrality.

Problem signature

• Modality: images (premises) with text hypotheses labeled for entailment.
• Data state: Flickr30K images paired with SNLI hypotheses for visual entailment.
• Scale regime: 550K image-hypothesis pairs with entailment labels.
• Model requirement: Any VLM for visual entailment.

Use when

• You need visual entailment training or evaluation data.
• You want to test VLM reasoning about image-text consistency.
• You need a large-scale visual reasoning dataset.

Do not use when

• Visual entailment is not your focus.
• Standard VQA evaluation is sufficient.
• You need more complex reasoning tasks.

Required inputs

• flickr30k_images: Flickr30K images as visual premises.
• snli_hypotheses: Text hypotheses from SNLI adapted for visual entailment.
• entailment_labels: Labels: entailment, contradiction, or neutral.

Optional inputs

• reasoning_chains: Explanations for entailment decisions.

Outputs

• snli_ve_dataset: 550K visual entailment examples.
• ve_benchmark: Visual entailment benchmark.

Assumptions and prerequisites

• Visual entailment tests image-text consistency understanding.
• SNLI hypotheses can be adapted for visual premises.
• Entailment reasoning is an important VLM capability.

Procedure

1. Pair images with hypotheses Action: Match Flickr30K images with SNLI text hypotheses. Why: Creates visual entailment examples. Note: See paper for details.
2. Label entailment Action: Label each pair as entailment, contradiction, or neutral. Why: Labels provide the training/evaluation signal. Note: See paper for details.
3. Validate labels Action: Review labels for accuracy. Why: Quality control ensures benchmark reliability. Note: See paper for details.
4. Benchmark VLMs Action: Evaluate VLMs on visual entailment. Why: Tests image-text consistency reasoning. Note: See paper for details.

Parameters to set

• label_distribution — Role: Balance of entailment labels. How to set: Roughly balanced across three classes. Default/range: ~1/3 each. Effect: Balance prevents shortcut learning.

Validation checks

• VLMs should discriminate between entailment, contradiction, and neutral.
• Label accuracy should be high.
• The benchmark should be challenging for current models.

Failure modes

• Some image-hypothesis pairs may be ambiguous.
• SNLI hypotheses may not always fit visual premises.
• Visual entailment may be easier than text entailment.

Adaptation notes for VLM training

• Visual entailment data can be used for VLM reasoning training.
• Include in instruction tuning mixes for consistency reasoning.
• The entailment format tests important VLM capabilities.

Implementation notes

• Use standard NLI evaluation metrics.
• Balance label distribution in training.
• Compare to text-only NLI performance.

Evidence from the paper

• SNLI-VE provides 550K visual entailment examples.
• The dataset tests VLM reasoning about image-text consistency.
• Visual entailment is a distinct capability from VQA.
• The benchmark is widely used for VLM reasoning evaluation.

Source paper

• Title: SNLI-VE: Visual Entailment Dataset
• Year: 2019
• Venue: AAAI
• Paper ID: arxiv-1901.06706v1
• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06706v1
• arXiv ID: 1901.06706v1