Public Technology Review

Public Technology Review

Process

1. Select and cite the governing procurement profile; FAR/NIST are reference models unless adopted by that jurisdiction.
2. Inventory need, planning, market research, solicitation, selection, award, administration, oversight, and public-release records.
3. Separate protected proposals/source-selection material from public releases.
4. Record claims and evidence without sentiment scores. Risk ratings require a human-defined scale, rationale, uncertainty, owner, and verification method.
5. Do not infer corruption, rank vendors, or recommend an award autonomously.
6. Record explicit handoff states for missing records, meeting/vote analysis, and any publication packet; protected material never enters a public handoff.

Output

A schema-valid evidence/risk review and human decision questions.

References

• schemas/public-technology-review.schema.json
• templates/public-technology-review.md
• docs/research/civic-workflow-standards.md
• docs/research/control-source-matrix.md