Construction Estimator Pro
Complete construction estimating methodology — from quantity takeoff to bid submission. Zero dependencies.
Phase 1: Project Classification & Estimate Type
Estimate Type Decision Matrix
| Project Stage |
Estimate Type |
Accuracy |
Basis |
Use Case |
| Concept |
Order of Magnitude |
-30% to +50% |
SF/unit costs |
Go/no-go decisions |
| Schematic |
Conceptual/Budget |
-15% to +30% |
Assembly costs |
Budget approval |
| Design Dev |
Detailed |
-10% to +15% |
Quantity takeoff |
GMP/bid preparation |
| Construction Docs |
Definitive/Bid |
-5% to +10% |
Full QTO + subs |
Lump sum bid |
| Construction |
Control |
Actual costs |
Committed + forecast |
Cost management |
Project Brief YAML
project:
name: ""
number: ""
type: residential | commercial | industrial | infrastructure | renovation
delivery: design-bid-build | design-build | CM-at-risk | IPD
location:
city: ""
state: ""
zip: ""
location_factor: 1.00 # RSMeans city cost index / national average
owner: ""
architect: ""
scope:
gross_sf: 0
stories: 0
site_acres: 0
description: ""
schedule:
bid_date: ""
construction_start: ""
substantial_completion: ""
duration_months: 0
estimate:
type: order-of-magnitude | conceptual | detailed | definitive
base_date: "" # Date costs are based on
escalation_rate: 0.04 # Annual construction cost escalation
assumptions:
- ""
exclusions:
- ""
allowances:
- item: ""
amount: 0
Project Type Quick Reference
| Type |
Key Considerations |
Typical $/SF Range (2024-2026) |
| Single Family Residential |
Foundation type, finishes grade, energy code |
$150-$400/SF |
| Multi-Family |
Unit mix, parking ratio, amenities |
$200-$450/SF |
| Office (Class A) |
Curtain wall, MEP density, TI allowance |
$250-$550/SF |
| Retail |
Shell vs TI, storefront, grease traps |
$150-$350/SF |
| Healthcare/Hospital |
Life safety, med gas, shielding |
$400-$900/SF |
| K-12 Education |
Prevailing wage, hazmat, phasing |
$300-$600/SF |
| Warehouse/Distribution |
Clear height, slab flatness, dock count |
$80-$180/SF |
| Hotel |
Star rating drives finish, FF&E budget |
$200-$500/SF |
| Infrastructure (road/mile) |
Soil conditions, utilities, traffic control |
$2M-$10M/mile |
Phase 2: Quantity Takeoff (QTO)
CSI MasterFormat Division Structure
Use CSI MasterFormat 2018 for ALL estimates. Every line item maps to a division.
| Division |
Name |
Typical % of Total |
| 01 |
General Requirements |
8-12% |
| 02 |
Existing Conditions |
1-5% |
| 03 |
Concrete |
8-15% |
| 04 |
Masonry |
2-6% |
| 05 |
Metals (Structural Steel) |
8-15% |
| 06 |
Wood, Plastics, Composites |
3-8% |
| 07 |
Thermal & Moisture Protection |
4-8% |
| 08 |
Openings (Doors/Windows) |
3-7% |
| 09 |
Finishes |
8-15% |
| 10 |
Specialties |
1-3% |
| 11 |
Equipment |
1-5% |
| 12 |
Furnishings |
1-5% |
| 13 |
Special Construction |
0-3% |
| 14 |
Conveying Equipment (Elevators) |
1-4% |
| 21 |
Fire Suppression |
2-4% |
| 22 |
Plumbing |
4-8% |
| 23 |
HVAC |
8-15% |
| 26 |
Electrical |
8-15% |
| 27 |
Communications |
1-3% |
| 28 |
Electronic Safety & Security |
1-3% |
| 31 |
Earthwork |
3-8% |
| 32 |
Exterior Improvements |
2-6% |
| 33 |
Utilities |
2-5% |
QTO Best Practices
- Measure twice, price once — QTO errors cascade through the entire estimate
- Use consistent units — SF for areas, LF for linear, CY for volume, EA for items
- Add waste factors by material:
- Concrete: 5-8%
- Masonry: 3-5%
- Drywall: 10-12%
- Roofing: 8-10%
- Flooring (tile): 10-15%
- Lumber: 8-10%
- Rebar: 5-7%
- Paint: 10-15%
- Document measurement methodology — so anyone can verify
- Cross-check totals — SF of drywall ≈ 2.5-3x floor area (both sides of walls + ceilings)
QTO Line Item Template
line_item:
division: "03"
spec_section: "03 30 00"
description: "Cast-in-Place Concrete - Elevated Slabs"
quantity: 450
unit: CY
unit_cost:
labor: 85.00
material: 165.00
equipment: 25.00
subcontractor: 0.00
total_unit_cost: 275.00
extended_cost: 123750.00
waste_factor: 0.07
adjusted_quantity: 481.5
notes: "4500 PSI, #5 rebar @ 12\" OC EW, 6\" slab"
source: "Sub quote - ABC Concrete (02/15/2026)"
confidence: high | medium | low
Quantity Verification Cross-Checks
| Check |
Formula |
Flag If |
| Concrete per SF |
Total CY ÷ Building SF |
>0.15 CY/SF (unless heavy structure) |
| Steel per SF |
Total tons ÷ Building SF |
>15 PSF (unless high-rise) |
| Drywall SF |
Total drywall SF ÷ Floor SF |
<2.0 or >4.0 ratio |
| Electrical per SF |
Electrical $ ÷ Building SF |
>$35/SF (standard office) |
| Plumbing fixtures |
Count vs occupancy |
Missing fixtures for code compliance |
| Parking spaces |
Per local code requirements |
Below minimum ratio |
Phase 3: Pricing & Cost Assembly
Unit Cost Development
Cost source hierarchy (most reliable first):
- Subcontractor quotes (3 minimum per trade) — best for bid estimates
- Historical project data — adjusted for location, time, scope
- RSMeans/Gordian data — industry standard reference
- Vendor quotes — for specific materials/equipment
- Published cost guides — Marshall & Swift, Craftsman
Labor Cost Build-Up
labor_rate_build_up:
trade: "Carpenter"
base_wage: 42.50
fringe_benefits: 18.75 # Health, pension, vacation, training
payroll_taxes: 8.90 # FICA, FUTA, SUTA, workers comp
total_burden: 27.65
burdened_rate: 70.15
productivity_factors:
weather: 1.00 # 1.0 = normal, 1.15 = winter
overtime: 1.00 # 1.0 = straight time, 1.5 = OT
height: 1.00 # 1.0 = ground, 1.10 = >30ft
congestion: 1.00 # 1.0 = open, 1.15 = tight
shift: 1.00 # 1.0 = day, 1.10 = swing, 1.15 = night
adjusted_rate: 70.15
Subcontractor Quote Evaluation
Score each sub quote (use minimum 3 per trade):
| Factor |
Weight |
1-5 Score |
| Price competitiveness |
30% |
|
| Scope completeness (covers all spec sections?) |
25% |
|
| Qualifications/exclusions (red flags?) |
20% |
|
| Past performance/reputation |
15% |
|
| Bond capacity/insurance |
10% |
|
| Weighted Total |
100% |
|
Red flags in sub quotes:
- "As needed" or "TBD" line items (scope gap)
- Short validity period (<30 days)
- Unusual exclusions (e.g., electrician excluding wire)
- No reference to spec sections
- Price significantly below others (they missed something)
Crew Rate Assembly
Crew Daily Cost = Σ(Workers × Daily Rate) + Equipment Daily Cost
Crew Daily Output = Units per 8-hour day (from labor standards)
Unit Cost = Crew Daily Cost ÷ Crew Daily Output
Example — Concrete Placement Crew:
- 1 Foreman @ $75/hr × 8 = $600
- 4 Laborers @ $55/hr × 8 = $1,760
- 1 Vibrator operator @ $60/hr × 8 = $480
- Concrete pump (daily rental) = $1,200
- Crew Daily Cost = $4,040
- Daily output: 50 CY
- Unit Labor+Equipment Cost = $80.80/CY
- Material (concrete delivered) = $165/CY
- Total in-place cost = $245.80/CY
Phase 4: Indirect Costs & Markups
General Conditions (Division 01) Checklist
| Item |
Duration-Based? |
Typical Range |
| Project Manager |
Yes |
$12K-$18K/month |
| Superintendent |
Yes |
$10K-$16K/month |
| Project Engineer |
Yes |
$8K-$12K/month |
| Field Office (trailer) |
Yes |
$1K-$3K/month |
| Temporary utilities |
Yes |
$2K-$5K/month |
| Temporary toilets |
Yes |
$200-$500/month each |
| Dumpsters/waste removal |
Yes |
$1K-$4K/month |
| Safety equipment/supplies |
Yes |
$500-$2K/month |
| Small tools & consumables |
Lump |
1-2% of labor |
| Final cleaning |
Lump |
$0.15-$0.50/SF |
| Permits (building) |
Lump |
Varies by jurisdiction |
| Insurance (Builder's Risk) |
Lump |
0.5-1.5% of cost |
| Performance/Payment Bond |
Lump |
1-3% of contract |
| Testing & inspection |
Lump |
0.5-1.5% of cost |
| As-built documentation |
Lump |
$5K-$25K |
| Commissioning support |
Lump |
$10K-$50K |
Rule of thumb: General conditions = 8-15% of direct costs (lower for large projects, higher for small/complex).
Markup Stack
markup_calculation:
direct_costs: 2500000
general_conditions:
percentage: 0.10
amount: 250000
subtotal_1: 2750000
overhead:
percentage: 0.05 # Home office overhead
amount: 137500
subtotal_2: 2887500
profit:
percentage: 0.05 # Varies by market/risk
amount: 144375
subtotal_3: 3031875
contingency:
design_contingency: 0.05 # For incomplete drawings
construction_contingency: 0.03 # For unforeseen conditions
amount: 242550
bond:
percentage: 0.015
amount: 49118
escalation:
rate: 0.04 # Annual
months_to_midpoint: 8
amount: 88536
total_estimate: 3412079
cost_per_sf: 341.21 # For 10,000 SF building
Contingency Guide
| Estimate Type |
Design Contingency |
Construction Contingency |
| Order of Magnitude |
15-25% |
10-15% |
| Conceptual |
10-15% |
5-10% |
| Detailed |
3-8% |
3-5% |
| Definitive/Bid |
0-3% |
2-3% |
Contingency is NOT profit padding. Track and justify every contingency draw.
Phase 5: Bid Preparation & Strategy
Bid/No-Bid Decision Scorecard
Score 1-5 for each (minimum 30 to bid):
| Factor |
Weight |
Score |
| Project type experience |
3x |
|
| Client relationship/history |
2x |
|
| Current workload capacity |
3x |
|
| Geographic fit |
2x |
|
| Profit potential |
3x |
|
| Competition level (fewer = better) |
2x |
|
| Risk profile (lower = better) |
3x |
|
| Schedule feasibility |
2x |
|
| Bonding capacity available |
2x |
|
| Weighted Total |
/110 |
|
Bid Day Checklist
48 hours before:
Day of bid:
Competitive Bid Strategy
Market conditions affect markup:
- Hot market (lots of work): Markup 8-12% (O&P combined)
- Normal market: Markup 6-10%
- Slow market: Markup 3-6%
- Must-win/strategic: Markup 2-4% (minimum to cover overhead)
Bid spread analysis (track your results):
Bid Spread = (Your Bid - Low Bid) ÷ Low Bid × 100
- Consistently >10% high → Your costs are inflated or productivity assumptions too conservative
- Consistently <2% from low → You might be leaving money on the table
- Target: Within 3-5% of winning bid
Phase 6: Value Engineering (VE)
VE Opportunity Matrix
| System |
VE Opportunity |
Typical Savings |
Risk Level |
| Structural |
Steel vs concrete frame |
5-15% of structure |
Medium |
| Foundations |
Spread vs mat vs piles |
10-30% of foundation |
High (geotech dependent) |
| Envelope |
Curtain wall vs storefront |
15-30% of facade |
Low-Medium |
| Roofing |
TPO vs modified bitumen |
10-20% of roofing |
Low |
| Mechanical |
VAV vs VRF |
10-25% of HVAC |
Medium |
| Electrical |
LED fixtures, panel optimization |
5-15% of electrical |
Low |
| Finishes |
Material substitutions |
10-40% of finishes |
Low |
| Site |
Reduce import/export of soil |
10-30% of sitework |
Medium |
VE Proposal Template
ve_item:
number: VE-001
description: "Substitute VRF system for conventional VAV"
division: "23"
original:
description: "VAV air handling system with ductwork"
cost: 850000
proposed:
description: "Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) with DOAS"
cost: 680000
savings: 170000
savings_pct: 20%
impact:
schedule: "Reduces mechanical rough-in by 2 weeks"
quality: "Better zone control, lower operating cost"
maintenance: "Higher per-unit cost but less ductwork"
code_compliance: "Meets ASHRAE 90.1, verify local amendments"
risk: medium
recommendation: accept | reject | modify
requires_redesign: yes | no
redesign_cost: 15000
net_savings: 155000
VE Decision Rules
- Never VE life safety — fire protection, structural integrity, egress
- Calculate lifecycle cost — cheap upfront ≠ cheap over 20 years
- Get architect/engineer sign-off before bidding VE alternates
- Document everything — VE that isn't documented becomes a scope gap
- Owner decides — present options with data, let them choose
Phase 7: Change Order Management
Change Order Pricing Rules
Contractor markup on changes (typical):
| Tier |
Self-Performed Work |
Subcontractor Work |
| Overhead |
10% |
5% |
| Profit |
10% |
5% |
| Bond |
Add actual % |
Add actual % |
Time & Material (T&M) documentation requirements:
- Daily time sheets signed by owner's rep
- Material invoices with delivery tickets
- Equipment logs with hours
- Photos of work in progress
Change Order YAML Template
change_order:
number: CO-001
date: ""
description: ""
reason:
type: owner-directed | unforeseen-condition | design-error | code-change | scope-clarification
rfi_number: ""
cost_breakdown:
labor:
hours: 0
rate: 0
total: 0
material:
items: []
total: 0
equipment:
items: []
total: 0
subcontractor:
items: []
total: 0
direct_cost: 0
markup: 0.15
total_cost: 0
schedule_impact:
days: 0
critical_path: yes | no
explanation: ""
status: pending | approved | rejected | negotiating
Change Order Negotiation Tips
- Price it immediately — delay weakens your position
- Submit with backup — labor rates, material quotes, productivity analysis
- Separate time from money — negotiate schedule impact independently
- Track cumulative impact — 20 small changes = major schedule disruption (even if each is "0 days")
- Constructive acceleration — if owner delays approval but expects same completion, document it
- Unit price book — agree on unit prices at contract start for common change types
Phase 8: Cost Control During Construction
Earned Value Management (EVM)
Budget at Completion (BAC) = Total budget
Planned Value (PV) = Budgeted cost of work scheduled
Earned Value (EV) = Budgeted cost of work performed
Actual Cost (AC) = Actual cost of work performed
Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = EV / PV
>1.0 = ahead of schedule
<1.0 = behind schedule
Cost Performance Index (CPI) = EV / AC
>1.0 = under budget
<1.0 = over budget
Estimate at Completion (EAC) = BAC / CPI
Variance at Completion (VAC) = BAC - EAC
Monthly Cost Report Template
cost_report:
project: ""
period: ""
report_date: ""
summary:
original_contract: 0
approved_changes: 0
pending_changes: 0
current_budget: 0
committed_cost: 0 # Subcontracts + POs
actual_cost_to_date: 0
forecast_to_complete: 0
estimate_at_completion: 0
variance: 0
contingency_remaining: 0
schedule:
percent_complete: 0
spi: 0
cpi: 0
days_ahead_behind: 0
cash_flow:
billed_to_date: 0
collected_to_date: 0
retention_held: 0
risk_items:
- description: ""
potential_cost: 0
probability: high | medium | low
mitigation: ""
Cost Control Red Flags
| Signal |
What It Means |
Action |
| CPI < 0.95 in first 25% |
Systemic cost overrun |
Root cause analysis NOW |
| Contingency burn > schedule % |
Burning contingency too fast |
Tighten change management |
| >5 pending COs unsigned |
Cash flow risk, scope dispute |
Escalate to PM/owner |
| Sub invoices > committed |
Sub performing extra work |
Verify scope, issue CO or stop work |
| Retainage release requests early |
Sub cash flow problems |
Monitor closely, check lien waivers |
Phase 9: Specialty Estimate Types
Renovation/Remodel Estimating
Add these factors to renovation estimates:
- Selective demolition: Price item-by-item (never lump sum)
- Hazmat survey: Asbestos ($3-5K), lead paint ($2-4K) — MANDATORY before bid
- Abatement: 2-5x removal cost vs new construction equivalent
- Protection of existing: Dust barriers, floor protection, HVAC isolation
- Working hours: Occupied buildings = nights/weekends = premium labor
- Discovery allowance: 10-15% for hidden conditions behind walls
- Temporary facilities: HVAC, power, restrooms during renovation
- Phasing/sequencing: Adds 15-30% management overhead
Sitework Estimating
Critical factors:
sitework_checklist:
geotechnical:
- Soil bearing capacity
- Water table depth
- Rock depth (blasting vs mechanical?)
- Contamination (Phase I/II ESA results)
earthwork:
cut_cy: 0
fill_cy: 0
import_export: 0 # Net CY to haul
haul_distance_miles: 0
compaction_required: standard | proctor_95 | proctor_98
utilities:
water_tap_fee: 0
sewer_tap_fee: 0
fire_line: 0
storm_detention: required | not_required
paving:
asphalt_sy: 0
concrete_sy: 0
curb_lf: 0
striping_lf: 0
landscape:
sod_sf: 0
trees_ea: 0
irrigation: yes | no
erosion_control: silt_fence | inlet_protection | retention_pond
MEP (Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing) Quick Checks
| System |
$/SF Benchmark (Commercial Office) |
Flag If |
| HVAC |
$25-$50/SF |
>$55 or <$20 |
| Plumbing |
$12-$25/SF |
>$30 or <$8 |
| Fire Protection |
$4-$8/SF |
>$10 or <$3 |
| Electrical (power) |
$18-$35/SF |
>$40 or <$12 |
| Low voltage/data |
$5-$12/SF |
>$15 or <$3 |
| Total MEP |
$64-$130/SF |
>$150 or <$46 |
Phase 10: Escalation & Location Adjustments
Construction Cost Escalation
Future Cost = Current Cost × (1 + Annual Rate) ^ (Months to Midpoint ÷ 12)
Recent escalation trends (US):
- 2020-2022: 8-15% annually (pandemic/supply chain)
- 2023-2024: 4-6% annually (normalizing)
- 2025-2026 forecast: 3-5% annually
- Long-term average: 3-4% annually
Always escalate to the MIDPOINT of construction, not the start.
Location Factor Application
Local Cost = National Average Cost × City Cost Index
Sample RSMeans City Cost Indices (100 = national average):
| City |
Index |
|
City |
Index |
| New York, NY |
130-145 |
|
Dallas, TX |
88-95 |
| San Francisco, CA |
125-140 |
|
Atlanta, GA |
90-97 |
| Boston, MA |
115-130 |
|
Phoenix, AZ |
88-94 |
| Chicago, IL |
110-120 |
|
Denver, CO |
95-105 |
| Seattle, WA |
108-118 |
|
Nashville, TN |
88-95 |
| Washington, DC |
100-110 |
|
Charlotte, NC |
85-92 |
| Miami, FL |
92-100 |
|
Houston, TX |
85-93 |
| Minneapolis, MN |
105-112 |
|
Rural areas |
70-85 |
Phase 11: Estimate Quality Review
100-Point Estimate Quality Rubric
| Dimension |
Weight |
Criteria |
| Scope completeness |
20 |
All spec sections priced, no gaps, exclusions documented |
| Quantity accuracy |
20 |
QTO verified, cross-checks pass, waste factors applied |
| Pricing basis |
15 |
3+ sub quotes per trade, current material prices, documented sources |
| Indirect costs |
10 |
GCs detailed (not lump), schedule-based items tied to duration |
| Markup appropriateness |
10 |
Market-competitive, risk-adjusted, contingency justified |
| Documentation |
10 |
Assumptions listed, basis of estimate narrative, organized by division |
| Adjustments |
10 |
Location factor applied, escalation to midpoint, seasonal factors |
| Presentation |
5 |
Professional format, clear summary, alternates separated |
Grading: 90+ = Bid-ready | 75-89 = Needs refinement | 60-74 = Major gaps | <60 = Redo
Peer Review Checklist
Phase 12: Common Mistakes & Edge Cases
10 Estimate-Killing Mistakes
| # |
Mistake |
Prevention |
| 1 |
Missing addenda |
Checklist: log every addendum, initial when incorporated |
| 2 |
Incomplete sub scope |
Write scope sheets with inclusions AND exclusions |
| 3 |
Wrong labor rates |
Verify union vs open shop, prevailing wage, location |
| 4 |
No escalation |
ALWAYS escalate to construction midpoint |
| 5 |
Lump sum general conditions |
Detail every line item tied to schedule |
| 6 |
Ignoring phasing |
Multi-phase = mobilize/demobilize multiple times |
| 7 |
Missing temporary work |
Shoring, dewatering, winter protection, dust control |
| 8 |
Under-priced site conditions |
Get geotech report BEFORE estimating foundations |
| 9 |
Scope gaps between trades |
Who installs the backing for the TV mount? |
| 10 |
Not reading the fine print |
Liquidated damages, retainage, payment terms |
Edge Cases
Occupied building renovation:
- Work hours restriction → labor premium 15-40%
- Dust/noise control → add $2-5/SF
- Security/escort requirements → add supervision cost
- Existing condition discovery → 10-15% allowance minimum
Remote/rural project:
- Travel/per diem for crews → $150-$250/worker/day
- Material delivery premium → 5-15% depending on distance
- Limited sub market → fewer quotes, less competitive pricing
- Equipment mobilization → long haul costs for cranes, excavators
Fast-track schedule:
- Overtime premium → plan 20-30% labor cost increase
- Acceleration costs → additional supervision, equipment
- Out-of-sequence work → productivity losses 10-25%
- Premium material delivery → expediting fees
Public/government work:
- Prevailing wages → 20-40% labor cost increase
- DBE/MBE/WBE goals → subcontracting requirements, good faith effort
- Buy American/Buy America → material cost premium 10-30%
- Bid protest risk → ensure perfect compliance with ITB
Design-Build:
- Design contingency higher (incomplete docs at pricing)
- Self-perform vs sub trade-offs
- Design liability insurance (professional liability)
- Allowances for owner decisions not yet made
Natural Language Commands
| Command |
Action |
| "Estimate this project" |
Run full estimate workflow from Phase 1 |
| "Price [division/trade]" |
Develop unit costs for specific trade |
| "Check my quantities" |
Run QTO verification cross-checks |
| "Value engineer [system]" |
Generate VE alternatives with savings |
| "Write change order for [scope]" |
Generate CO with pricing and backup |
| "Compare sub quotes for [trade]" |
Score and compare subcontractor bids |
| "Monthly cost report" |
Generate EVM-based cost report |
| "Bid/no-bid analysis for [project]" |
Run decision scorecard |
| "Location adjust to [city]" |
Apply RSMeans location factor |
| "Escalate costs to [date]" |
Calculate escalation to future midpoint |
| "Review my estimate" |
Run 100-point quality rubric |
| "Generate bid summary" |
Format estimate for bid submission |
1---2name: afrexai-construction-estimator3description: Complete construction estimating and cost management system. Use when preparing project estimates, bid proposals, cost breakdowns, value engineering, change order management, or construction budget tracking. Covers residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Trigger on 'estimate', 'construction cost', 'bid', 'takeoff', 'cost breakdown', 'change order', 'value engineering', 'construction budget', 'unit pricing', 'RSMeans'.4---56# Construction Estimator Pro78> Complete construction estimating methodology — from quantity takeoff to bid submission. Zero dependencies.910---1112## Phase 1: Project Classification & Estimate Type1314### Estimate Type Decision Matrix1516| Project Stage | Estimate Type | Accuracy | Basis | Use Case |17|---|---|---|---|---|18| Concept | Order of Magnitude | -30% to +50% | SF/unit costs | Go/no-go decisions |19| Schematic | Conceptual/Budget | -15% to +30% | Assembly costs | Budget approval |20| Design Dev | Detailed | -10% to +15% | Quantity takeoff | GMP/bid preparation |21| Construction Docs | Definitive/Bid | -5% to +10% | Full QTO + subs | Lump sum bid |22| Construction | Control | Actual costs | Committed + forecast | Cost management |2324### Project Brief YAML2526```yaml27project:28 name: ""29 number: ""30 type: residential | commercial | industrial | infrastructure | renovation31 delivery: design-bid-build | design-build | CM-at-risk | IPD32 location:33 city: ""34 state: ""35 zip: ""36 location_factor: 1.00 # RSMeans city cost index / national average37 owner: ""38 architect: ""39 40scope:41 gross_sf: 042 stories: 043 site_acres: 044 description: ""45 46schedule:47 bid_date: ""48 construction_start: ""49 substantial_completion: ""50 duration_months: 051 52estimate:53 type: order-of-magnitude | conceptual | detailed | definitive54 base_date: "" # Date costs are based on55 escalation_rate: 0.04 # Annual construction cost escalation56 57assumptions:58 - ""59exclusions:60 - ""61allowances:62 - item: ""63 amount: 064```6566### Project Type Quick Reference6768| Type | Key Considerations | Typical $/SF Range (2024-2026) |69|---|---|---|70| Single Family Residential | Foundation type, finishes grade, energy code | $150-$400/SF |71| Multi-Family | Unit mix, parking ratio, amenities | $200-$450/SF |72| Office (Class A) | Curtain wall, MEP density, TI allowance | $250-$550/SF |73| Retail | Shell vs TI, storefront, grease traps | $150-$350/SF |74| Healthcare/Hospital | Life safety, med gas, shielding | $400-$900/SF |75| K-12 Education | Prevailing wage, hazmat, phasing | $300-$600/SF |76| Warehouse/Distribution | Clear height, slab flatness, dock count | $80-$180/SF |77| Hotel | Star rating drives finish, FF&E budget | $200-$500/SF |78| Infrastructure (road/mile) | Soil conditions, utilities, traffic control | $2M-$10M/mile |7980---8182## Phase 2: Quantity Takeoff (QTO)8384### CSI MasterFormat Division Structure8586Use CSI MasterFormat 2018 for ALL estimates. Every line item maps to a division.8788| Division | Name | Typical % of Total |89|---|---|---|90| 01 | General Requirements | 8-12% |91| 02 | Existing Conditions | 1-5% |92| 03 | Concrete | 8-15% |93| 04 | Masonry | 2-6% |94| 05 | Metals (Structural Steel) | 8-15% |95| 06 | Wood, Plastics, Composites | 3-8% |96| 07 | Thermal & Moisture Protection | 4-8% |97| 08 | Openings (Doors/Windows) | 3-7% |98| 09 | Finishes | 8-15% |99| 10 | Specialties | 1-3% |100| 11 | Equipment | 1-5% |101| 12 | Furnishings | 1-5% |102| 13 | Special Construction | 0-3% |103| 14 | Conveying Equipment (Elevators) | 1-4% |104| 21 | Fire Suppression | 2-4% |105| 22 | Plumbing | 4-8% |106| 23 | HVAC | 8-15% |107| 26 | Electrical | 8-15% |108| 27 | Communications | 1-3% |109| 28 | Electronic Safety & Security | 1-3% |110| 31 | Earthwork | 3-8% |111| 32 | Exterior Improvements | 2-6% |112| 33 | Utilities | 2-5% |113114### QTO Best Practices1151161. **Measure twice, price once** — QTO errors cascade through the entire estimate1172. **Use consistent units** — SF for areas, LF for linear, CY for volume, EA for items1183. **Add waste factors by material:**119 - Concrete: 5-8%120 - Masonry: 3-5%121 - Drywall: 10-12%122 - Roofing: 8-10%123 - Flooring (tile): 10-15%124 - Lumber: 8-10%125 - Rebar: 5-7%126 - Paint: 10-15%1274. **Document measurement methodology** — so anyone can verify1285. **Cross-check totals** — SF of drywall ≈ 2.5-3x floor area (both sides of walls + ceilings)129130### QTO Line Item Template131132```yaml133line_item:134 division: "03"135 spec_section: "03 30 00"136 description: "Cast-in-Place Concrete - Elevated Slabs"137 quantity: 450138 unit: CY139 unit_cost:140 labor: 85.00141 material: 165.00142 equipment: 25.00143 subcontractor: 0.00144 total_unit_cost: 275.00145 extended_cost: 123750.00146 waste_factor: 0.07147 adjusted_quantity: 481.5148 notes: "4500 PSI, #5 rebar @ 12\" OC EW, 6\" slab"149 source: "Sub quote - ABC Concrete (02/15/2026)"150 confidence: high | medium | low151```152153### Quantity Verification Cross-Checks154155| Check | Formula | Flag If |156|---|---|---|157| Concrete per SF | Total CY ÷ Building SF | >0.15 CY/SF (unless heavy structure) |158| Steel per SF | Total tons ÷ Building SF | >15 PSF (unless high-rise) |159| Drywall SF | Total drywall SF ÷ Floor SF | <2.0 or >4.0 ratio |160| Electrical per SF | Electrical $ ÷ Building SF | >$35/SF (standard office) |161| Plumbing fixtures | Count vs occupancy | Missing fixtures for code compliance |162| Parking spaces | Per local code requirements | Below minimum ratio |163164---165166## Phase 3: Pricing & Cost Assembly167168### Unit Cost Development169170**Cost source hierarchy (most reliable first):**1711. **Subcontractor quotes** (3 minimum per trade) — best for bid estimates1722. **Historical project data** — adjusted for location, time, scope1733. **RSMeans/Gordian data** — industry standard reference1744. **Vendor quotes** — for specific materials/equipment1755. **Published cost guides** — Marshall & Swift, Craftsman176177### Labor Cost Build-Up178179```yaml180labor_rate_build_up:181 trade: "Carpenter"182 base_wage: 42.50183 fringe_benefits: 18.75 # Health, pension, vacation, training184 payroll_taxes: 8.90 # FICA, FUTA, SUTA, workers comp185 total_burden: 27.65186 burdened_rate: 70.15187 188 productivity_factors:189 weather: 1.00 # 1.0 = normal, 1.15 = winter190 overtime: 1.00 # 1.0 = straight time, 1.5 = OT191 height: 1.00 # 1.0 = ground, 1.10 = >30ft192 congestion: 1.00 # 1.0 = open, 1.15 = tight193 shift: 1.00 # 1.0 = day, 1.10 = swing, 1.15 = night194 adjusted_rate: 70.15195```196197### Subcontractor Quote Evaluation198199Score each sub quote (use minimum 3 per trade):200201| Factor | Weight | 1-5 Score |202|---|---|---|203| Price competitiveness | 30% | |204| Scope completeness (covers all spec sections?) | 25% | |205| Qualifications/exclusions (red flags?) | 20% | |206| Past performance/reputation | 15% | |207| Bond capacity/insurance | 10% | |208| **Weighted Total** | 100% | |209210**Red flags in sub quotes:**211- "As needed" or "TBD" line items (scope gap)212- Short validity period (<30 days)213- Unusual exclusions (e.g., electrician excluding wire)214- No reference to spec sections215- Price significantly below others (they missed something)216217### Crew Rate Assembly218219```220Crew Daily Cost = Σ(Workers × Daily Rate) + Equipment Daily Cost221Crew Daily Output = Units per 8-hour day (from labor standards)222Unit Cost = Crew Daily Cost ÷ Crew Daily Output223```224225**Example — Concrete Placement Crew:**226- 1 Foreman @ $75/hr × 8 = $600227- 4 Laborers @ $55/hr × 8 = $1,760228- 1 Vibrator operator @ $60/hr × 8 = $480229- Concrete pump (daily rental) = $1,200230- **Crew Daily Cost = $4,040**231- Daily output: 50 CY232- **Unit Labor+Equipment Cost = $80.80/CY**233- Material (concrete delivered) = $165/CY234- **Total in-place cost = $245.80/CY**235236---237238## Phase 4: Indirect Costs & Markups239240### General Conditions (Division 01) Checklist241242| Item | Duration-Based? | Typical Range |243|---|---|---|244| Project Manager | Yes | $12K-$18K/month |245| Superintendent | Yes | $10K-$16K/month |246| Project Engineer | Yes | $8K-$12K/month |247| Field Office (trailer) | Yes | $1K-$3K/month |248| Temporary utilities | Yes | $2K-$5K/month |249| Temporary toilets | Yes | $200-$500/month each |250| Dumpsters/waste removal | Yes | $1K-$4K/month |251| Safety equipment/supplies | Yes | $500-$2K/month |252| Small tools & consumables | Lump | 1-2% of labor |253| Final cleaning | Lump | $0.15-$0.50/SF |254| Permits (building) | Lump | Varies by jurisdiction |255| Insurance (Builder's Risk) | Lump | 0.5-1.5% of cost |256| Performance/Payment Bond | Lump | 1-3% of contract |257| Testing & inspection | Lump | 0.5-1.5% of cost |258| As-built documentation | Lump | $5K-$25K |259| Commissioning support | Lump | $10K-$50K |260261**Rule of thumb:** General conditions = 8-15% of direct costs (lower for large projects, higher for small/complex).262263### Markup Stack264265```yaml266markup_calculation:267 direct_costs: 2500000268 269 general_conditions:270 percentage: 0.10271 amount: 250000272 273 subtotal_1: 2750000274 275 overhead:276 percentage: 0.05 # Home office overhead277 amount: 137500278 279 subtotal_2: 2887500280 281 profit:282 percentage: 0.05 # Varies by market/risk283 amount: 144375284 285 subtotal_3: 3031875286 287 contingency:288 design_contingency: 0.05 # For incomplete drawings289 construction_contingency: 0.03 # For unforeseen conditions290 amount: 242550291 292 bond:293 percentage: 0.015294 amount: 49118295 296 escalation:297 rate: 0.04 # Annual298 months_to_midpoint: 8299 amount: 88536300 301 total_estimate: 3412079302 cost_per_sf: 341.21 # For 10,000 SF building303```304305### Contingency Guide306307| Estimate Type | Design Contingency | Construction Contingency |308|---|---|---|309| Order of Magnitude | 15-25% | 10-15% |310| Conceptual | 10-15% | 5-10% |311| Detailed | 3-8% | 3-5% |312| Definitive/Bid | 0-3% | 2-3% |313314**Contingency is NOT profit padding.** Track and justify every contingency draw.315316---317318## Phase 5: Bid Preparation & Strategy319320### Bid/No-Bid Decision Scorecard321322Score 1-5 for each (minimum 30 to bid):323324| Factor | Weight | Score |325|---|---|---|326| Project type experience | 3x | |327| Client relationship/history | 2x | |328| Current workload capacity | 3x | |329| Geographic fit | 2x | |330| Profit potential | 3x | |331| Competition level (fewer = better) | 2x | |332| Risk profile (lower = better) | 3x | |333| Schedule feasibility | 2x | |334| Bonding capacity available | 2x | |335| **Weighted Total** | /110 | |336337### Bid Day Checklist338339**48 hours before:**340- [ ] All sub quotes received (minimum 3 per trade)341- [ ] All material quotes current (check expiration dates)342- [ ] Addenda reviewed and incorporated (ALL of them)343- [ ] Scope gaps identified and plugged344- [ ] Math verified (independent check)345346**Day of bid:**347- [ ] Final sub quotes plugged in348- [ ] Markup/profit decision finalized349- [ ] Alternates priced if required350- [ ] Unit prices calculated if required351- [ ] Bid bond secured352- [ ] Bid form completed correctly (every blank filled)353- [ ] Acknowledge ALL addenda on bid form354- [ ] Authorized signature355- [ ] Delivered before deadline (allow 1+ hour buffer)356357### Competitive Bid Strategy358359**Market conditions affect markup:**360- Hot market (lots of work): Markup 8-12% (O&P combined)361- Normal market: Markup 6-10%362- Slow market: Markup 3-6%363- Must-win/strategic: Markup 2-4% (minimum to cover overhead)364365**Bid spread analysis** (track your results):366```367Bid Spread = (Your Bid - Low Bid) ÷ Low Bid × 100368```369- Consistently >10% high → Your costs are inflated or productivity assumptions too conservative370- Consistently <2% from low → You might be leaving money on the table371- Target: Within 3-5% of winning bid372373---374375## Phase 6: Value Engineering (VE)376377### VE Opportunity Matrix378379| System | VE Opportunity | Typical Savings | Risk Level |380|---|---|---|---|381| Structural | Steel vs concrete frame | 5-15% of structure | Medium |382| Foundations | Spread vs mat vs piles | 10-30% of foundation | High (geotech dependent) |383| Envelope | Curtain wall vs storefront | 15-30% of facade | Low-Medium |384| Roofing | TPO vs modified bitumen | 10-20% of roofing | Low |385| Mechanical | VAV vs VRF | 10-25% of HVAC | Medium |386| Electrical | LED fixtures, panel optimization | 5-15% of electrical | Low |387| Finishes | Material substitutions | 10-40% of finishes | Low |388| Site | Reduce import/export of soil | 10-30% of sitework | Medium |389390### VE Proposal Template391392```yaml393ve_item:394 number: VE-001395 description: "Substitute VRF system for conventional VAV"396 division: "23"397 398 original:399 description: "VAV air handling system with ductwork"400 cost: 850000401 402 proposed:403 description: "Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) with DOAS"404 cost: 680000405 406 savings: 170000407 savings_pct: 20%408 409 impact:410 schedule: "Reduces mechanical rough-in by 2 weeks"411 quality: "Better zone control, lower operating cost"412 maintenance: "Higher per-unit cost but less ductwork"413 code_compliance: "Meets ASHRAE 90.1, verify local amendments"414 415 risk: medium416 recommendation: accept | reject | modify417 requires_redesign: yes | no418 redesign_cost: 15000419 net_savings: 155000420```421422### VE Decision Rules4234241. **Never VE life safety** — fire protection, structural integrity, egress4252. **Calculate lifecycle cost** — cheap upfront ≠ cheap over 20 years4263. **Get architect/engineer sign-off** before bidding VE alternates4274. **Document everything** — VE that isn't documented becomes a scope gap4285. **Owner decides** — present options with data, let them choose429430---431432## Phase 7: Change Order Management433434### Change Order Pricing Rules435436**Contractor markup on changes (typical):**437| Tier | Self-Performed Work | Subcontractor Work |438|---|---|---|439| Overhead | 10% | 5% |440| Profit | 10% | 5% |441| Bond | Add actual % | Add actual % |442443**Time & Material (T&M) documentation requirements:**444- Daily time sheets signed by owner's rep445- Material invoices with delivery tickets446- Equipment logs with hours447- Photos of work in progress448449### Change Order YAML Template450451```yaml452change_order:453 number: CO-001454 date: ""455 description: ""456 457 reason:458 type: owner-directed | unforeseen-condition | design-error | code-change | scope-clarification459 rfi_number: ""460 461 cost_breakdown:462 labor:463 hours: 0464 rate: 0465 total: 0466 material:467 items: []468 total: 0469 equipment:470 items: []471 total: 0472 subcontractor:473 items: []474 total: 0475 direct_cost: 0476 markup: 0.15477 total_cost: 0478 479 schedule_impact:480 days: 0481 critical_path: yes | no482 explanation: ""483 484 status: pending | approved | rejected | negotiating485```486487### Change Order Negotiation Tips4884891. **Price it immediately** — delay weakens your position4902. **Submit with backup** — labor rates, material quotes, productivity analysis4913. **Separate time from money** — negotiate schedule impact independently4924. **Track cumulative impact** — 20 small changes = major schedule disruption (even if each is "0 days")4935. **Constructive acceleration** — if owner delays approval but expects same completion, document it4946. **Unit price book** — agree on unit prices at contract start for common change types495496---497498## Phase 8: Cost Control During Construction499500### Earned Value Management (EVM)501502```503Budget at Completion (BAC) = Total budget504Planned Value (PV) = Budgeted cost of work scheduled505Earned Value (EV) = Budgeted cost of work performed506Actual Cost (AC) = Actual cost of work performed507508Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = EV / PV509 >1.0 = ahead of schedule510 <1.0 = behind schedule511512Cost Performance Index (CPI) = EV / AC513 >1.0 = under budget514 <1.0 = over budget515516Estimate at Completion (EAC) = BAC / CPI517Variance at Completion (VAC) = BAC - EAC518```519520### Monthly Cost Report Template521522```yaml523cost_report:524 project: ""525 period: ""526 report_date: ""527 528 summary:529 original_contract: 0530 approved_changes: 0531 pending_changes: 0532 current_budget: 0533 committed_cost: 0 # Subcontracts + POs534 actual_cost_to_date: 0535 forecast_to_complete: 0536 estimate_at_completion: 0537 variance: 0538 contingency_remaining: 0539 540 schedule:541 percent_complete: 0542 spi: 0543 cpi: 0544 days_ahead_behind: 0545 546 cash_flow:547 billed_to_date: 0548 collected_to_date: 0549 retention_held: 0550 551 risk_items:552 - description: ""553 potential_cost: 0554 probability: high | medium | low555 mitigation: ""556```557558### Cost Control Red Flags559560| Signal | What It Means | Action |561|---|---|---|562| CPI < 0.95 in first 25% | Systemic cost overrun | Root cause analysis NOW |563| Contingency burn > schedule % | Burning contingency too fast | Tighten change management |564| >5 pending COs unsigned | Cash flow risk, scope dispute | Escalate to PM/owner |565| Sub invoices > committed | Sub performing extra work | Verify scope, issue CO or stop work |566| Retainage release requests early | Sub cash flow problems | Monitor closely, check lien waivers |567568---569570## Phase 9: Specialty Estimate Types571572### Renovation/Remodel Estimating573574**Add these factors to renovation estimates:**575- Selective demolition: Price item-by-item (never lump sum)576- Hazmat survey: Asbestos ($3-5K), lead paint ($2-4K) — MANDATORY before bid577- Abatement: 2-5x removal cost vs new construction equivalent578- Protection of existing: Dust barriers, floor protection, HVAC isolation579- Working hours: Occupied buildings = nights/weekends = premium labor580- Discovery allowance: 10-15% for hidden conditions behind walls581- Temporary facilities: HVAC, power, restrooms during renovation582- Phasing/sequencing: Adds 15-30% management overhead583584### Sitework Estimating585586**Critical factors:**587```yaml588sitework_checklist:589 geotechnical:590 - Soil bearing capacity591 - Water table depth 592 - Rock depth (blasting vs mechanical?)593 - Contamination (Phase I/II ESA results)594 595 earthwork:596 cut_cy: 0597 fill_cy: 0598 import_export: 0 # Net CY to haul599 haul_distance_miles: 0600 compaction_required: standard | proctor_95 | proctor_98601 602 utilities:603 water_tap_fee: 0604 sewer_tap_fee: 0605 fire_line: 0606 storm_detention: required | not_required607 608 paving:609 asphalt_sy: 0610 concrete_sy: 0611 curb_lf: 0612 striping_lf: 0613 614 landscape:615 sod_sf: 0616 trees_ea: 0617 irrigation: yes | no618 erosion_control: silt_fence | inlet_protection | retention_pond619```620621### MEP (Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing) Quick Checks622623| System | $/SF Benchmark (Commercial Office) | Flag If |624|---|---|---|625| HVAC | $25-$50/SF | >$55 or <$20 |626| Plumbing | $12-$25/SF | >$30 or <$8 |627| Fire Protection | $4-$8/SF | >$10 or <$3 |628| Electrical (power) | $18-$35/SF | >$40 or <$12 |629| Low voltage/data | $5-$12/SF | >$15 or <$3 |630| **Total MEP** | **$64-$130/SF** | **>$150 or <$46** |631632---633634## Phase 10: Escalation & Location Adjustments635636### Construction Cost Escalation637638```639Future Cost = Current Cost × (1 + Annual Rate) ^ (Months to Midpoint ÷ 12)640```641642**Recent escalation trends (US):**643- 2020-2022: 8-15% annually (pandemic/supply chain)644- 2023-2024: 4-6% annually (normalizing)645- 2025-2026 forecast: 3-5% annually646- Long-term average: 3-4% annually647648**Always escalate to the MIDPOINT of construction**, not the start.649650### Location Factor Application651652```653Local Cost = National Average Cost × City Cost Index654```655656**Sample RSMeans City Cost Indices (100 = national average):**657658| City | Index | | City | Index |659|---|---|---|---|---|660| New York, NY | 130-145 | | Dallas, TX | 88-95 |661| San Francisco, CA | 125-140 | | Atlanta, GA | 90-97 |662| Boston, MA | 115-130 | | Phoenix, AZ | 88-94 |663| Chicago, IL | 110-120 | | Denver, CO | 95-105 |664| Seattle, WA | 108-118 | | Nashville, TN | 88-95 |665| Washington, DC | 100-110 | | Charlotte, NC | 85-92 |666| Miami, FL | 92-100 | | Houston, TX | 85-93 |667| Minneapolis, MN | 105-112 | | Rural areas | 70-85 |668669---670671## Phase 11: Estimate Quality Review672673### 100-Point Estimate Quality Rubric674675| Dimension | Weight | Criteria |676|---|---|---|677| **Scope completeness** | 20 | All spec sections priced, no gaps, exclusions documented |678| **Quantity accuracy** | 20 | QTO verified, cross-checks pass, waste factors applied |679| **Pricing basis** | 15 | 3+ sub quotes per trade, current material prices, documented sources |680| **Indirect costs** | 10 | GCs detailed (not lump), schedule-based items tied to duration |681| **Markup appropriateness** | 10 | Market-competitive, risk-adjusted, contingency justified |682| **Documentation** | 10 | Assumptions listed, basis of estimate narrative, organized by division |683| **Adjustments** | 10 | Location factor applied, escalation to midpoint, seasonal factors |684| **Presentation** | 5 | Professional format, clear summary, alternates separated |685686**Grading:** 90+ = Bid-ready | 75-89 = Needs refinement | 60-74 = Major gaps | <60 = Redo687688### Peer Review Checklist689690- [ ] All addenda acknowledged and incorporated?691- [ ] Spec sections cross-referenced to QTO? (no orphan specs)692- [ ] Sub quotes match scope of work? (read exclusions!)693- [ ] General conditions duration matches schedule?694- [ ] Bond premium calculated on TOTAL including markups?695- [ ] Sales tax applied correctly? (varies by state, some exempt)696- [ ] Prevailing wage rates used if required? (Davis-Bacon, state)697- [ ] Owner-furnished items excluded from pricing?698- [ ] Alternates priced separately and clearly?699- [ ] Math checked independently? (not just formula check — spot-check quantities)700701---702703## Phase 12: Common Mistakes & Edge Cases704705### 10 Estimate-Killing Mistakes706707| # | Mistake | Prevention |708|---|---|---|709| 1 | Missing addenda | Checklist: log every addendum, initial when incorporated |710| 2 | Incomplete sub scope | Write scope sheets with inclusions AND exclusions |711| 3 | Wrong labor rates | Verify union vs open shop, prevailing wage, location |712| 4 | No escalation | ALWAYS escalate to construction midpoint |713| 5 | Lump sum general conditions | Detail every line item tied to schedule |714| 6 | Ignoring phasing | Multi-phase = mobilize/demobilize multiple times |715| 7 | Missing temporary work | Shoring, dewatering, winter protection, dust control |716| 8 | Under-priced site conditions | Get geotech report BEFORE estimating foundations |717| 9 | Scope gaps between trades | Who installs the backing for the TV mount? |718| 10 | Not reading the fine print | Liquidated damages, retainage, payment terms |719720### Edge Cases721722**Occupied building renovation:**723- Work hours restriction → labor premium 15-40%724- Dust/noise control → add $2-5/SF725- Security/escort requirements → add supervision cost726- Existing condition discovery → 10-15% allowance minimum727728**Remote/rural project:**729- Travel/per diem for crews → $150-$250/worker/day730- Material delivery premium → 5-15% depending on distance731- Limited sub market → fewer quotes, less competitive pricing732- Equipment mobilization → long haul costs for cranes, excavators733734**Fast-track schedule:**735- Overtime premium → plan 20-30% labor cost increase736- Acceleration costs → additional supervision, equipment737- Out-of-sequence work → productivity losses 10-25%738- Premium material delivery → expediting fees739740**Public/government work:**741- Prevailing wages → 20-40% labor cost increase742- DBE/MBE/WBE goals → subcontracting requirements, good faith effort743- Buy American/Buy America → material cost premium 10-30%744- Bid protest risk → ensure perfect compliance with ITB745746**Design-Build:**747- Design contingency higher (incomplete docs at pricing)748- Self-perform vs sub trade-offs749- Design liability insurance (professional liability)750- Allowances for owner decisions not yet made751752---753754## Natural Language Commands755756| Command | Action |757|---|---|758| "Estimate this project" | Run full estimate workflow from Phase 1 |759| "Price [division/trade]" | Develop unit costs for specific trade |760| "Check my quantities" | Run QTO verification cross-checks |761| "Value engineer [system]" | Generate VE alternatives with savings |762| "Write change order for [scope]" | Generate CO with pricing and backup |763| "Compare sub quotes for [trade]" | Score and compare subcontractor bids |764| "Monthly cost report" | Generate EVM-based cost report |765| "Bid/no-bid analysis for [project]" | Run decision scorecard |766| "Location adjust to [city]" | Apply RSMeans location factor |767| "Escalate costs to [date]" | Calculate escalation to future midpoint |768| "Review my estimate" | Run 100-point quality rubric |769| "Generate bid summary" | Format estimate for bid submission |