johnalbertini14-glitch Technical Debt Audit
Systematic technical debt assessment for engineering teams. Identifies, scores, and prioritizes debt across your codebase with business impact analysis and remediation roadmaps.
What It Does
- Debt Discovery — Categorizes debt: architecture, code quality, dependency, testing, infrastructure, documentation
- Impact Scoring — Rates each item on effort (1-5), risk (1-5), and business impact (1-5) using a weighted formula
- Cost Modeling — Estimates carrying cost per sprint in developer-hours and dollars
- Remediation Roadmap — Generates a prioritized paydown plan with quick wins, scheduled work, and strategic rewrites
- Executive Summary — One-page board-ready report showing debt-to-velocity ratio and projected savings
Usage
Describe your system, stack, and known pain points. The agent audits systematically:
"Audit our technical debt. We're a Node.js/React SaaS with 180K LOC,
12 engineers. Known issues: monolithic API, no integration tests,
3 deprecated dependencies, manual deployments."
Scoring Formula
Priority Score = (Risk × 3) + (Business Impact × 2) + (1/Effort × 1)
Higher score = fix first. Quick wins (low effort, high risk) surface to the top.
Debt Categories
| Category | Examples | Typical Carrying Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Monoliths, tight coupling, wrong patterns | 15-25% velocity drag |
| Code Quality | Duplication, god classes, no standards | 10-20% velocity drag |
| Dependencies | Outdated libs, security vulns, EOL frameworks | 5-15% + incident risk |
| Testing | No tests, flaky tests, manual QA only | 20-40% bug-fix overhead |
| Infrastructure | Manual deploys, no monitoring, snowflake servers | 10-30% ops overhead |
| Documentation | No onboarding docs, tribal knowledge | 2-4 weeks per new hire |
Output Format
# Technical Debt Audit Report
## Executive Summary
- Total debt items: [N]
- Estimated carrying cost: $[X]/month
- Debt-to-velocity ratio: [X]%
- Quick wins available: [N] items, [X] dev-days
## Critical (Fix This Sprint)
...
## High Priority (Next 30 Days)
...
## Scheduled (Next Quarter)
...
## Strategic (Plan & Budget)
...
## Remediation Roadmap
Week 1-2: [Quick wins]
Month 1: [High priority]
Quarter: [Scheduled items]
Why This Matters
Engineering teams spend 23-42% of development time on technical debt (Stripe Developer Report). Most don't measure it. What you don't measure, you can't manage.
Built by AfrexAI — AI-powered business operations tools.
Need the full engineering context pack? Browse our AI Context Packs ($47) or try the free AI Revenue Calculator.