Intelligence Ingestion

Intelligence Ingestion Skill

When the user shares a URL, article, tweet, thread, or any piece of external information, execute this pipeline automatically. Do NOT ask for permission — just process it.

Trigger Conditions

USE this skill when:

• User sends a URL (x.com, github.com, any domain)
• User pastes article text or tweet content
• User says "analyze this", "evaluate this", "what do you think about this"
• User forwards content from Telegram or any messaging surface
• User shares something and asks about strategic value

DO NOT USE when:

• User is asking a general question unrelated to external content
• User is asking about internal workspace files
• User explicitly says they don't want analysis

Pipeline Steps

Step 1: READ — Extract Content

1. If a URL is provided, read the full content (use read_url_content or browser)
2. If text is pasted, use it directly
3. If X/Twitter link fails to parse (common), search web for the tweet content

Step 2: CLASSIFY — What Is This?

Assign one primary category and up to 2 secondary tags:

Step 3: ANALYZE — Strategic Value Assessment

For each piece of information, evaluate:

## Strategic Assessment
- **What is it?** [One sentence]
- **What can it do for us?** [Specific capability/benefit]
- **What can we build with it?** [Concrete output/project]
- **Strategic value:** [🔴 Critical / 🟡 High / 🟢 Medium / ⚪ Low]
- **Competitive edge:** [What advantage over people who don't have this?]
- **Relation to active bottleneck:** [Does it relate to context overflow/token saving?]

Reference the current engineering bottleneck from MEMORY.md → "Active Engineering Bottleneck" section.

Step 4: MAP — Relate to Existing Architecture

Check against the OpenClaw stack:

SOUL.md → PRINCIPLES.md → AGENTS.md (Identity Stack)
MEMORY.md (System State + Bottleneck)
TOOLS.md (Coprocessors: Codex, Antigravity, LM Studio)
Pilot Protocol (Context Separation Layer - P0)

Determine which layer this information impacts and note dependencies/synergies with existing components.

Step 5: STORE — Write Obsidian Note

Create a note at:

/Volumes/T7 Shield/Obsidian_Vault/20_Intelligence/YYYYMMDD_AuthorOrSource_ShortTitle.md

Follow this template exactly:

# [Title]

**Source:** [Link](URL)
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Category:** [Primary Category] / [Secondary Tags]
**Strategic Value:** [🔴/🟡/🟢/⚪] + one-line reason
**Relation to Active Bottleneck:** [Yes/No + how]

---

## Summary
[2-3 paragraphs of core content]

## Key Takeaways
[Numbered list of actionable insights]

## Impact on OpenClaw Architecture
[How this relates to our stack]

## Action Items
[What to do next, if anything]

---

**Keke's Note:** [Opinionated analysis in Keke's voice — direct, no-BS, relate to 阳哥's goals]

Step 6: REMEMBER — Update Memory

1. Always append to today's daily log: ~/.openclaw/workspace/memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md
2. If strategic value is 🔴 Critical: Also update MEMORY.md (Pending Work or Active Bottleneck)
3. If it suggests a new principle: Flag for potential PRINCIPLES.md update
4. If it's a new tool/service: Flag for potential TOOLS.md update

Step 7: RESPOND — Summarize to User

Reply with a concise summary:

📥 已摄取: [Title]
📂 类别: [Category]
🎯 战略价值: [🔴/🟡/🟢/⚪] [One-line reason]
💾 已存档: Obsidian → 20_Intelligence/[filename]
📝 已记录: memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md
🔗 关联: [Which existing component it relates to]
⚡ 建议行动: [Next step, if any]

Edge Cases

• Multiple URLs in one message: Process each separately, create separate Obsidian notes
• Duplicate/similar content: Check if similar note exists, merge or reference instead of duplicating
• Non-English content: Analyze in original language, write notes in Chinese (matching existing vault style)
• Paywalled/inaccessible content: Note as "content unavailable" and work with whatever user provided
• User provides their own analysis: Incorporate their judgment, don't overwrite — they know their system best

Quality Checklist

Before completing, verify:

• Obsidian note created with correct filename format
• Daily memory log updated
• Source URL preserved in note
• Strategic value assessed against current bottleneck
• Keke's Note written with genuine analysis (not generic)
• User received confirmation summary