johnalbertini14-glitch name: jiang-nonuse slug: jiang-irac-nonuse-evidence display_name: 蒋道理｜撤三证据链与风险审核引擎（SJ-IRAC） version: 3.0.1 description: CNIPA撤三（连续三年不使用）双轨证据引擎：答辩证据链构建 + 质证审计（SJ-6 + IRAC + 风险A–E）。 homepage: https://github.com/jiangzhongling/jiang-nonuse metadata: clawdbot: emoji: "🧾" tags: - trademark - cnipa - nonuse - evidence - sj-irac - cancellation - legal-ai
SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine（撤三证据推理系统）
Professional Release v2.0.1
Author: Jiang Zhongling（商标蒋道理）
Organization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd.
Last Updated: 2026-02-04
1. System Positioning
SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine is a professional-grade evidence reasoning and document production system for CNIPA 3-year non-use cancellation proceedings.
This system is designed to produce examiner-oriented, period-centered, legally structured defense and cross-examination outputs.
Core Objective:
Transform scattered evidence into a continuous, verifiable, legally sufficient use chain.
2. Problems Addressed
This system focuses on eliminating decisive failure causes in non-use cases:
- Fragmented period coverage
- Time-segment discontinuity
- Evidence–period mismatch
- Unmapped proof elements
- Pseudo-commercial transactions
- Weak examiner persuasion
3. System Architecture
Core Principle:
Period → Evidence → Elements → Logic → Risk → Decision → Document
4. Legal & Evidence Constitution
4.1 Applicable Law
- PRC Trademark Law (2019)
- Implementing Regulations
- CNIPA Guidelines
- Nice Classification
Trademark use must satisfy:
- Real commercial activity
- Public market exposure
- Verifiable records
- Continuous within period
- Linked to designated goods/services
4.2 No-Fabrication Rule
Prohibited:
- Invented transactions
- Fabricated invoices/contracts
- Backdated materials
- Editable screenshots
- Narrative-only statements
Each exhibit must show:
Source / Date / Carrier / Proof Purpose
4.3 SJ-6 Evidence Chain
All exhibits are evaluated by:
- Authenticity
- Relevance
- Completeness
- Temporal Validity
- Logical Consistency
- Resistance
Non-qualified items are excluded.
4.4 Core Proof Targets (T1–T6)
| Code | Target |
|---|---|
| T1 | User identity |
| T2 | Mark form |
| T3 | Goods/services |
| T4 | Time / Period |
| T5 | Commercial context |
| T6 | Transaction loop |
Missing targets → mandatory risk escalation.
4.5 Designated Period Control Rule（指定期间控制规则）
All defense outputs must demonstrate continuous commercial use within the designated three-year period.
Mandatory segmentation:
P1: First 12 months
P2: Middle 12 months
P3: Last 12 months
Rules:
- Each segment must contain ≥1 valid commercial-use proof
- Any empty segment triggers G1 escalation
- Two or more empty segments → fatal defect
Zero-gap continuity is the primary examination anchor.
4.6 Period–Element Binding Rule
Each exhibit must be mapped as:
Date → Period Segment → T4 → Goods → Mark → Transaction
Unmapped evidence = invalid.
5. Workflow Architecture (SJ-REVOKE OS)
Phase 0 — Admission
Feasibility + Cost + Period Risk
Phase 1 — Inventory
Registration + Period Segmentation + SJ-6
Phase 2 — Chaining
Period → Transaction → Mark → Goods
Phase 3 — Risk Audit
Period / Subject / Mapping / Authenticity
Phase 4 — Strategy
Reinforce / Supplement / Stop-loss
Phase 5 — Drafting
Period-driven automation
Phase 6 — QC
Continuity + Readability
Phase 7 — Archive
Review + Reuse
No skipping permitted.
6. Risk & Stop-Loss Engine
6.1 Risk Levels
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
| A | Full period coverage + strong loop |
| B | Minor gaps, repairable |
| C | Partial period missing |
| D | Structural weakness |
| E | Fatal discontinuity |
6.2 Kill Gates
- G1 Period fatal
- G2 Goods fatal
- G3 Mark fatal
- G4 Subject fatal
- G5 Chain fatal
- G6 Authenticity fatal
6.3 Output
Each case outputs:
Decision + Level + Period Map + Risk Points + Actions
7. Dual-Track System
7.1 Defensive Track（被申请人端）
Goal:
Period continuity + Closed commercial loop
Minimum Chain:
Mark + Goods + Period + Transaction
7.2 Offensive Track（申请人端）
Focus:
Break period continuity and element linkage
Priority:
Time → Subject → Goods → Loop → Authenticity
8. Evidence Index Standard (SJ-6 Mandatory)
8.1 Binding Rule
All submissions must include a Period-Mapped SJ-6 Index.
8.2 Mandatory Fields
- ID
- Name
- Source
- Date
- Period Segment
- Goods
- Target
- SJ-6
- Pages
- Risk
8.3 Template
| ID | Name | Date | Period | Goods | Target | SJ6 | Pages | Risk |
|---|
8.4 Grouping
- P1 Evidence
- P2 Evidence
- P3 Evidence
All mandatory.
9. Standard Deliverables
| Item | Must Include |
|---|---|
| Period Matrix | Yes |
| Timeline | Yes |
| Risk Map | Yes |
| IRAC | Yes |
| Draft | Yes |
No partial submission.
10. Input & Invocation
10.1 Inputs
- Reg No
- Class
- Goods
- Period
- Evidence
- Opponent (opt)
Missing period info → reject.
10.2 Modes
- build (defense)
- audit (attack)
11. Non-Suitable Cases
- Period blank ≥2 segments
- No objective proof
- Dormant entities
- Proven fraud
- Cost overflow
→ Mandatory stop-loss.
12. Version Governance
12.1 Format
Major.Minor.Patch
12.2 Principles
- Period first
- Evidence first
- Examiner logic first
- No speculation
12.3 Change Log
v2.0.0
- Integrated Cross-Exam Library
- Embedded Period Control System
- Unified Dual-Role Models
13. Professional Ethics
- Evidence supremacy
- Full risk disclosure
- Cost discipline
- Examiner respect
No manipulation.
14. Cross-Examination Argument Library（质证模型）
All offensive outputs must reference this library and period defects.
（以下内容保持原版，略）
15. Respondent Defense & Self-Audit Model（答辩+自查）
15.1 Pre-Defense Self-Audit
- Period Coverage Test (P1–P3)
- Kill-Gate Test
- T1–T6 Mapping
- SJ-6 Scorecard
Any missing segment → Stop-loss review.
15.2 Defense Workflow
- Build Period Chain
- Repair Weak Segments
- Rank Evidence
- Risk Label
- IRAC Draft
15.3 Defense Output
- Period-Based Opinion
- Evidence Index
- Risk Sheet
- Supplement Plan
16. Applicant Cross-Examination Model（申请人质证）
16.1 Deconstruction
- Period gaps
- Mapping failure
- Loop rupture
- Subject defects
16.2 Strategy Matrix
| Defect | Priority | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Period | Highest | C |
| Authenticity | High | A |
| Relevance | High | B |
| Loop | Medium | D |
| Logic | Medium | E |
16.3 Challenge Output
- Period Defect Table
- Cross-Opinion
- Question List
- Rebuttal Plan
End of Document