johnalbertini14-glitch Trust Verifier
Trust, but verify. Assess the trustworthiness of a ClawHub skill by analyzing its publisher, history, dependencies, and consistency.
Why This Exists
Security scanning catches known malicious patterns. But what about skills that are technically clean but published by unknown authors, have inconsistent version histories, or depend on untrusted packages? Trust Verifier fills the gap between "no vulnerabilities detected" and "safe to install."
Commands
Assess trust for a skill directory
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/trust_verifier.py assess --path ~/.openclaw/skills/some-skill/
Generate a trust attestation
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/trust_verifier.py attest --path ~/.openclaw/skills/some-skill/ --output trust.json
Verify an existing attestation
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/trust_verifier.py verify --attestation trust.json --path ~/.openclaw/skills/some-skill/
Check dependency trust chain
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/trust_verifier.py deps --path ~/.openclaw/skills/some-skill/
Trust Signals
- Publisher reputation: Known vs unknown publisher, account age, skill count
- Version consistency: Do updates match expected patterns? Sudden permission changes?
- Content integrity: SHA-256 hashes of all files, reproducible builds
- Dependency chain: Are dependencies from trusted sources?
- Community signals: Moltbook mentions, upvotes, known endorsements
Trust Levels
- VERIFIED — Meets all trust criteria, attestation valid
- TRUSTED — Most signals positive, minor gaps
- UNKNOWN — Insufficient data to assess trust
- SUSPICIOUS — One or more trust signals failed
- UNTRUSTED — Multiple trust failures, do not install