Career Planning
Child of career-coach. This skill turns career direction — whether from a formal assessment or a stated ambition — into concrete, time-bound, measurable plans with milestones, gate checks, and accountability mechanisms.
Scope: roadmaps, career OKRs, milestone sequencing, certification strategy, professional development plans, 30/90/365-day plans, multi-year trajectories.
Siblings:
career-coach (parent) — overall career coaching, assessment, strategy
career-assessment — strengths/gaps analysis, competency mapping, career fit evaluation
career-positioning — LinkedIn, personal brand, recruiter strategy, visibility (positioning strategy)
career-application-writer — writing/tailoring the CV and cover letter
career-online-presence — personal site, GitHub, social, AI findability
career-transition — salary, title, offer negotiation, moves, pivots
When NOT to Use This Skill
| If the user needs... |
Redirect to... |
| Strengths/gaps analysis, "where am I today?" |
career-assessment |
| Positioning strategy, LinkedIn, personal brand |
career-positioning |
| Writing or tailoring the CV / cover letter |
career-application-writer |
| Building online presence / findability |
career-online-presence |
| Salary negotiation, offer evaluation, moves |
career-transition |
| General career advice, big-picture strategy |
career-coach |
Description Triggers
Activate this skill when the user mentions: career roadmap, career plan, goals, timeline, professional development, certifications, learning plan, OKRs, milestones, "how do I get there?", career planning, development plan, 30-day plan, 90-day plan, quarterly goals, career objectives, promotion timeline, skill-building plan, certification path.
HARD RULES
- Always read the user profile from
~/.claude/skills/career-coach/references/user-profile.md before producing any plan.
- Plans must have specific dates, not "soon" or "eventually."
- Every plan item needs a success metric — a way to objectively verify completion or progress.
- Reference
~/.claude/skills/career-coach/references/corporate-ladders.md for promotion timeline expectations.
- Use "professional development" not "skills development" terminology.
- Plan for role volatility. AI is reshaping role mixes faster than traditional plans assume — every multi-year plan should re-validate its target on a semi-annual cadence, keep a portable evidence trail (deployed projects, quantified wins), and include an AI-fluency track (Framework 6). Don't lock a 3-year plan and walk away.
Interaction Pattern
Follow this sequence for every planning engagement:
Step 1: Confirm Career Target
Pull from a prior assessment or ask the user directly. The target must be specific:
- NOT: "I want to be a CTO"
- YES: "CTO of a mid-tier bank, 500+ tech staff, board exposure, within 7 years"
Step 2: Choose Planning Horizon
Ask the user which timeframe they need:
- 30-day plan — quick wins, visibility actions
- 90-day plan — capability building, relationship expansion
- 365-day plan — position transformation, title/grade progress
- Multi-year trajectory — full reverse career plan with stepping-stone roles
Step 3: Apply Appropriate Framework
Select from the frameworks below based on the horizon and the user's situation.
Step 4: Produce Concrete Plan
Every plan item must include:
- What — specific action
- By when — exact date
- Success metric — how we know it is done
- Dependencies — what needs to happen first
Step 5: Identify First Action (This Week)
No plan is complete without a single action the user commits to executing this week. It must be small enough to be achievable and visible enough to create momentum.
Frameworks
1. Reverse Career Planning (5-Step)
Use for multi-year trajectories and when the user has a clear end-state ambition.
Step 1 — Define the End State Precisely
Do not accept vague targets. Push for specificity:
- NOT: "CTO"
- YES: "CTO of mid-tier bank (AUM $50B-200B), managing 500+ tech staff, with board-level exposure, P&L ownership of technology budget, within 7 years"
Specificity dimensions: title, organization type/size, scope (headcount, budget), influence level, geography, and timeline.
Step 2 — Research the Path
- Identify 10-15 people who currently hold the target role (LinkedIn research)
- Map their career trajectories backwards — what roles did they hold 3, 5, 10 years ago?
- Identify the 2-3 most common stepping-stone paths
- Note the credentials, experiences, and relationships that recur across multiple profiles
Step 3 — Identify the Penultimate Role
- What role sits directly below the target?
- What are its hard requirements (title, scope, years of experience, certifications)?
- What is the typical tenure before promotion to the target?
- What differentiates those who make the jump from those who plateau?
Step 4 — Work Backwards to Current Position
- Map every gap between where the user is now and the penultimate role
- Categorize gaps: experience gaps, credential gaps, relationship gaps, visibility gaps
- Sequence the gap-closing actions — which must come first?
Step 5 — Build 2-3 Parallel Paths
- Never build a single-path plan; always provide optionality
- Path A: fastest route (highest risk, requires perfect execution)
- Path B: balanced route (moderate risk, allows for setbacks)
- Path C: conservative route (lowest risk, longest timeline, most resilience)
2. Career OKRs (Quarterly)
Use for converting long-term direction into quarterly execution cycles.
Structure:
- Objective: Directional, inspiring, tied to the career target. One sentence. Qualitative.
- Key Results (3-4): Measurable, time-bound, within the user's control. Quantitative.
Principles:
- Key Results must be outcomes, not activities ("Gain executive sponsorship from an MD-level leader" not "Have coffee with executives")
- At least one KR should be a stretch (60-70% confidence of achievement)
- KRs must be within the user's sphere of influence — do not depend on others' decisions
Examples for Banking IT:
Objective: Establish myself as the go-to AI strategy leader in the technology division.
KR1: Present AI strategy paper to the CIO forum by [specific date] — success metric: presentation delivered, at least 2 follow-up conversations with senior leaders.
KR2: Gain executive sponsorship from an MD-level leader for an AI initiative by [specific date] — success metric: named sponsor documented in project charter.
KR3: Complete AWS Solutions Architect Professional certification by [specific date] — success metric: certification earned and added to internal profile.
KR4: Publish internal thought-leadership piece on AI in regulatory compliance by [specific date] — success metric: published on internal platform with 50+ views.
Review Cadence:
- Weekly: 15-minute self-check — are KRs on track? Any blockers?
- Monthly: Adjust KRs if circumstances change (reorg, new priorities). Document why.
- Quarterly: Full reset. Score each KR (0.0-1.0). Set new OKRs for next quarter.
Scoring:
- 0.7-1.0 = strong delivery
- 0.4-0.6 = progress but fell short
- 0.0-0.3 = missed — analyze why and adjust approach
3. 70/20/10 Professional Development Model
Use for building a comprehensive development plan that balances learning methods.
70% Experiential Learning (On-the-Job)
Specific stretch assignments for banking IT professionals:
- Lead a cross-functional initiative — e.g., coordinate a cloud migration workstream across infrastructure, security, and business teams
- Take P&L ownership — volunteer to own the budget for a technology initiative, even a small one; demonstrate commercial acumen
- Manage a crisis — step up during an outage, audit finding, or regulatory issue; crisis leadership is disproportionately career-accelerating
- Present to regulators — volunteer for regulatory exam preparation; direct regulator interaction signals senior-readiness
- Deliver an executive briefing — present a technology strategy or risk assessment to C-suite; practice synthesizing complex topics for non-technical audiences
- Run a vendor selection — lead an RFP process end-to-end; demonstrates procurement, negotiation, and decision-making capability
20% Social Learning (Relationships)
- Executive coffee chats (2-3 per month): Structured 20-minute conversations with leaders 2+ levels above. Prepare 2 thoughtful questions. Follow up with a brief thank-you and insight summary.
- Peer mastermind group: Form or join a group of 4-6 peers at similar career stages. Meet monthly. Each person brings one challenge; group problem-solves.
- Structured feedback loops: After every significant deliverable, ask your manager and one stakeholder: "What worked? What would you change?" Document and act on patterns.
- Reverse mentoring: Offer to mentor a senior leader on emerging technology (AI, cloud-native). Builds relationship while demonstrating expertise.
AI-fluency examples across the bands:
- 70% (experiential): ship one real LLM-API project end-to-end; introduce an AI-augmented workflow to your team and own its quality bar.
- 20% (social): join or run an AI-practitioner peer group; reverse-mentor a senior leader on practical AI use.
- 10% (formal): targeted current-generation AI/tooling learning — but a demonstrable project beats a generic badge (see Framework 6 and §5).
10% Formal Learning (Courses, Certifications, Events)
Certifications that matter in banking:
- See Certification Strategy section below for detailed tiers
Conferences:
- Sibos (SWIFT) — global banking infrastructure and payments
- Money20/20 — fintech, payments innovation
- Risk.net events — risk management, regulatory technology
- AWS re:Invent / Microsoft Ignite — cloud architecture (pick your platform)
- Internal bank conferences and town halls — visibility within the organization
Executive Education:
- Short programs (1-2 weeks): MIT Sloan, Wharton, INSEAD — signal ambition and breadth
- Timing: pursue after reaching senior manager / VP level; earlier is premature
4. Milestone Sequencing
Use for structuring any plan into time-bound phases with gate checks.
30-Day Plan (Quick Wins and Visibility)
Purpose: Build momentum, establish presence, signal intent.
Template:
| # |
Action |
By Date |
Success Metric |
Status |
| 1 |
[Visibility action — e.g., volunteer for a visible task] |
[date] |
[metric] |
|
| 2 |
[Quick win — e.g., solve a known pain point] |
[date] |
[metric] |
|
| 3 |
[Relationship action — e.g., schedule 4 coffee chats] |
[date] |
[metric] |
|
| 4 |
[Learning action — e.g., start certification study] |
[date] |
[metric] |
|
Gate Check at Day 30:
- Did I complete at least 3 of 4 actions?
- Did anyone senior notice? (If not, visibility strategy needs adjustment)
- What surprised me? What do I need to adjust?
90-Day Plan (Capability Building)
Purpose: Deepen capabilities, expand network, take on a stretch assignment.
Template:
| # |
Action |
By Date |
Success Metric |
Dependencies |
Status |
| 1 |
[Stretch assignment — e.g., lead a workstream] |
[date] |
[metric] |
[deps] |
|
| 2 |
[Certification milestone — e.g., pass exam] |
[date] |
[metric] |
[deps] |
|
| 3 |
[Network expansion — e.g., build 3 new senior relationships] |
[date] |
[metric] |
[deps] |
|
| 4 |
[Thought leadership — e.g., publish internal paper] |
[date] |
[metric] |
[deps] |
|
| 5 |
[Feedback collection — e.g., 360 feedback from 5 stakeholders] |
[date] |
[metric] |
[deps] |
|
Gate Check at Day 90:
- Am I on track for my annual target?
- Have I closed at least one significant gap?
- Do I have an executive sponsor or advocate? (If not, this is the #1 priority for the next 90 days)
365-Day Plan (Position Transformation)
Purpose: Achieve a meaningful career shift — title change, grade promotion, new role, or significant scope expansion.
Template:
| Quarter |
Theme |
Key Actions |
Success Metrics |
| Q1 |
Foundation |
[actions] |
[metrics] |
| Q2 |
Acceleration |
[actions] |
[metrics] |
| Q3 |
Consolidation |
[actions] |
[metrics] |
| Q4 |
Harvest |
[actions] |
[metrics] |
Gate Checks:
- End of Q1: Are foundations in place? Adjust if behind.
- End of Q2: Is momentum building? If not, escalate effort or recalibrate target.
- End of Q3: Is the promotion/transition conversation happening? If not, force it.
- End of Q4: Did you achieve the target? If yes, set next year's target. If no, diagnose honestly.
5. Certification Strategy for Banking AI
Use when the user asks about certifications, learning paths, or credentialing.
Guiding Principle: Certifications that signal "deployable capability in regulated environments" are worth far more than generic AI badges.
AI-credential currency (2026). For AI specifically, one demonstrable LLM-API project — deployed, with a live URL and a strong README — beats a stack of generic AI certificates. Generic AI/ML badges remain low signal in hiring; a real project ties directly to your GitHub portfolio and findability (route the portfolio build to career-online-presence). Always verify what counts as "current-generation" at planning time — the credential and tooling landscape shifts fast, so don't plan around last year's hot cert. (This principle generalizes above the banking tiers below: in any sector, shipped evidence > badge.)
Tier 1 — High Signal (Prioritize These)
| Certification |
Why It Matters in Banking |
Study Time |
| AWS Solutions Architect Professional |
Proves you can design production cloud architecture; banks are cloud-first now |
2-3 months |
| Azure AI Engineer Associate |
Microsoft-heavy banks value this; shows applied AI, not just theory |
1-2 months |
| CISSP |
Gold standard for security credibility; required for many senior roles in banking |
3-6 months |
Tier 2 — Domain Credibility (Build on Tier 1)
| Certification |
Why It Matters in Banking |
Study Time |
| CRISC (Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control) |
Shows you understand risk — the language of banking leadership |
2-4 months |
| CISM (Certified Information Security Manager) |
Management-focused security; complements CISSP for leadership roles |
2-3 months |
| Kubernetes (CKA/CKAD) + Terraform Associate |
Proves you can automate at scale; essential for platform/infrastructure leads |
1-2 months each |
Tier 3 — Nice to Have (Low Priority)
| Certification |
Notes |
| Generic AI/ML badges (Coursera, edX) |
Low signal in hiring; fine for personal learning |
| Vendor-specific narrow certs (e.g., single-service AWS certs) |
Too narrow to signal architectural capability |
| Project management (PMP, PRINCE2) |
Only if moving into pure delivery management; otherwise signals wrong direction for technical leaders |
Sequencing Advice:
- Start with one Tier 1 cert that aligns with your bank's primary cloud platform
- Add CISSP if pursuing any role with "security" or "risk" in the title or scope
- Layer Tier 2 certs based on your specific gap analysis
- Ignore Tier 3 unless you have completed Tier 1-2 and have spare capacity
6. AI-Fluency Competency Track
Use to plan deliberate growth in AI capability — a first-class competency for technical roles now, not an optional extra. Three levels, each mapped to the 70/20/10 model:
| Level |
What it means |
Plan it via |
| L1 — Personal productivity |
Use AI tools well in your own work; know their failure modes |
10% formal + daily practice |
| L2 — AI-augmented team workflows |
Introduce and govern AI-augmented workflows for your team; own the quality bar |
70% experiential + 20% social |
| L3 — Builds / governs AI systems |
Design, ship, and govern AI systems and their controls (model risk, evaluation, accountability) |
70% experiential (real LLM-API project) + L2 foundation |
Planning rules:
- Sequence L1 → L2 → L3; don't skip the foundation.
- Anchor on a portable evidence trail — a deployed LLM-API project (live URL + README) is the durable artifact; tie it to
career-online-presence's GitHub portfolio.
- Role-volatility planning — re-validate your AI-fluency target semi-annually (HARD RULE 6); the bar moves.
- Generalizes above banking: the levels apply in any sector; the worked examples just use a banking-tech lens.
Output Format
Every plan produced by this skill must include:
- Career Target Statement — one sentence, specific
- Planning Horizon — which timeframe was selected
- The Plan — table format with actions, dates, metrics, dependencies
- First Action This Week — bolded, specific, achievable
- Review Schedule — when the user will check progress
- Risks and Contingencies — what could go wrong and what to do about it
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern |
Why It Fails |
Correct Approach |
| Plans with vague timelines ("soon", "Q3-ish", "eventually") |
No accountability, no urgency — plans without dates are wishes |
Every action gets a specific date; every milestone gets a deadline with a review checkpoint |
| Stacking certifications without a strategic narrative |
Random certs signal "learning for learning's sake" rather than deliberate career positioning |
Sequence certs to build a coherent story aligned with your target role (e.g., cloud architect path, not scattered badges) |
| Planning without a success metric for each item |
No way to know if the plan is working — "improve leadership" means nothing measurable |
Every plan item needs a concrete metric: completed cert by date, visibility event count, sponsor meeting cadence |
| Creating a 3-year plan and never revisiting it |
Career context changes — reorgs, market shifts, new opportunities — stale plans mislead |
Build review gates: 30-day quick check, 90-day course correction, annual strategy refresh |
| Optimizing for promotion timeline without considering lateral moves |
Linear "wait for promotion" thinking ignores that lateral moves often accelerate advancement |
Always evaluate lateral moves, scope expansion, and strategic jumps alongside linear promotion paths |
| Building an AI-era plan with no AI-fluency track |
Role mixes are shifting under AI; a plan that ignores AI capability ages fast and leaves the user exposed |
Include the AI-Fluency Competency Track (Framework 6) and a portable evidence trail in any multi-year plan |
1---2name: career-planning3description: Use when the user needs to build a career plan, set milestones, define OKRs, create timelines, choose certifications, or map a professional development roadmap. Part of the career-* skill family.4---56# Career Planning78Child of `career-coach`. This skill turns career direction — whether from a formal assessment or a stated ambition — into concrete, time-bound, measurable plans with milestones, gate checks, and accountability mechanisms.910**Scope:** roadmaps, career OKRs, milestone sequencing, certification strategy, professional development plans, 30/90/365-day plans, multi-year trajectories.1112**Siblings:**13- `career-coach` (parent) — overall career coaching, assessment, strategy14- `career-assessment` — strengths/gaps analysis, competency mapping, career fit evaluation15- `career-positioning` — LinkedIn, personal brand, recruiter strategy, visibility (positioning strategy)16- `career-application-writer` — writing/tailoring the CV and cover letter17- `career-online-presence` — personal site, GitHub, social, AI findability18- `career-transition` — salary, title, offer negotiation, moves, pivots1920---2122## When NOT to Use This Skill2324| If the user needs... | Redirect to... |25|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------|26| Strengths/gaps analysis, "where am I today?" | `career-assessment` |27| Positioning strategy, LinkedIn, personal brand | `career-positioning` |28| Writing or tailoring the CV / cover letter | `career-application-writer` |29| Building online presence / findability | `career-online-presence` |30| Salary negotiation, offer evaluation, moves | `career-transition` |31| General career advice, big-picture strategy | `career-coach` |3233---3435## Description Triggers3637Activate this skill when the user mentions: career roadmap, career plan, goals, timeline, professional development, certifications, learning plan, OKRs, milestones, "how do I get there?", career planning, development plan, 30-day plan, 90-day plan, quarterly goals, career objectives, promotion timeline, skill-building plan, certification path.3839---4041## HARD RULES42431. **Always** read the user profile from `~/.claude/skills/career-coach/references/user-profile.md` before producing any plan.442. Plans must have **specific dates**, not "soon" or "eventually."453. Every plan item needs a **success metric** — a way to objectively verify completion or progress.464. Reference `~/.claude/skills/career-coach/references/corporate-ladders.md` for promotion timeline expectations.475. Use **"professional development"** not "skills development" terminology.486. **Plan for role volatility.** AI is reshaping role mixes faster than traditional plans assume — every multi-year plan should re-validate its target on a semi-annual cadence, keep a portable evidence trail (deployed projects, quantified wins), and include an AI-fluency track (Framework 6). Don't lock a 3-year plan and walk away.4950---5152## Interaction Pattern5354Follow this sequence for every planning engagement:5556### Step 1: Confirm Career Target57Pull from a prior assessment or ask the user directly. The target must be specific:58- NOT: "I want to be a CTO"59- YES: "CTO of a mid-tier bank, 500+ tech staff, board exposure, within 7 years"6061### Step 2: Choose Planning Horizon62Ask the user which timeframe they need:63- **30-day plan** — quick wins, visibility actions64- **90-day plan** — capability building, relationship expansion65- **365-day plan** — position transformation, title/grade progress66- **Multi-year trajectory** — full reverse career plan with stepping-stone roles6768### Step 3: Apply Appropriate Framework69Select from the frameworks below based on the horizon and the user's situation.7071### Step 4: Produce Concrete Plan72Every plan item must include:73- **What** — specific action74- **By when** — exact date75- **Success metric** — how we know it is done76- **Dependencies** — what needs to happen first7778### Step 5: Identify First Action (This Week)79No plan is complete without a single action the user commits to executing **this week**. It must be small enough to be achievable and visible enough to create momentum.8081---8283## Frameworks8485### 1. Reverse Career Planning (5-Step)8687Use for multi-year trajectories and when the user has a clear end-state ambition.8889**Step 1 — Define the End State Precisely**90Do not accept vague targets. Push for specificity:91- NOT: "CTO"92- YES: "CTO of mid-tier bank (AUM $50B-200B), managing 500+ tech staff, with board-level exposure, P&L ownership of technology budget, within 7 years"9394Specificity dimensions: title, organization type/size, scope (headcount, budget), influence level, geography, and timeline.9596**Step 2 — Research the Path**97- Identify 10-15 people who currently hold the target role (LinkedIn research)98- Map their career trajectories backwards — what roles did they hold 3, 5, 10 years ago?99- Identify the 2-3 most common stepping-stone paths100- Note the credentials, experiences, and relationships that recur across multiple profiles101102**Step 3 — Identify the Penultimate Role**103- What role sits directly below the target?104- What are its hard requirements (title, scope, years of experience, certifications)?105- What is the typical tenure before promotion to the target?106- What differentiates those who make the jump from those who plateau?107108**Step 4 — Work Backwards to Current Position**109- Map every gap between where the user is now and the penultimate role110- Categorize gaps: experience gaps, credential gaps, relationship gaps, visibility gaps111- Sequence the gap-closing actions — which must come first?112113**Step 5 — Build 2-3 Parallel Paths**114- Never build a single-path plan; always provide optionality115- Path A: fastest route (highest risk, requires perfect execution)116- Path B: balanced route (moderate risk, allows for setbacks)117- Path C: conservative route (lowest risk, longest timeline, most resilience)118119---120121### 2. Career OKRs (Quarterly)122123Use for converting long-term direction into quarterly execution cycles.124125**Structure:**126- **Objective:** Directional, inspiring, tied to the career target. One sentence. Qualitative.127- **Key Results (3-4):** Measurable, time-bound, within the user's control. Quantitative.128129**Principles:**130- Key Results must be outcomes, not activities ("Gain executive sponsorship from an MD-level leader" not "Have coffee with executives")131- At least one KR should be a stretch (60-70% confidence of achievement)132- KRs must be within the user's sphere of influence — do not depend on others' decisions133134**Examples for Banking IT:**135136> **Objective:** Establish myself as the go-to AI strategy leader in the technology division.137>138> **KR1:** Present AI strategy paper to the CIO forum by [specific date] — success metric: presentation delivered, at least 2 follow-up conversations with senior leaders.139>140> **KR2:** Gain executive sponsorship from an MD-level leader for an AI initiative by [specific date] — success metric: named sponsor documented in project charter.141>142> **KR3:** Complete AWS Solutions Architect Professional certification by [specific date] — success metric: certification earned and added to internal profile.143>144> **KR4:** Publish internal thought-leadership piece on AI in regulatory compliance by [specific date] — success metric: published on internal platform with 50+ views.145146**Review Cadence:**147- **Weekly:** 15-minute self-check — are KRs on track? Any blockers?148- **Monthly:** Adjust KRs if circumstances change (reorg, new priorities). Document why.149- **Quarterly:** Full reset. Score each KR (0.0-1.0). Set new OKRs for next quarter.150151**Scoring:**152- 0.7-1.0 = strong delivery153- 0.4-0.6 = progress but fell short154- 0.0-0.3 = missed — analyze why and adjust approach155156---157158### 3. 70/20/10 Professional Development Model159160Use for building a comprehensive development plan that balances learning methods.161162#### 70% Experiential Learning (On-the-Job)163164Specific stretch assignments for banking IT professionals:165- **Lead a cross-functional initiative** — e.g., coordinate a cloud migration workstream across infrastructure, security, and business teams166- **Take P&L ownership** — volunteer to own the budget for a technology initiative, even a small one; demonstrate commercial acumen167- **Manage a crisis** — step up during an outage, audit finding, or regulatory issue; crisis leadership is disproportionately career-accelerating168- **Present to regulators** — volunteer for regulatory exam preparation; direct regulator interaction signals senior-readiness169- **Deliver an executive briefing** — present a technology strategy or risk assessment to C-suite; practice synthesizing complex topics for non-technical audiences170- **Run a vendor selection** — lead an RFP process end-to-end; demonstrates procurement, negotiation, and decision-making capability171172#### 20% Social Learning (Relationships)173174- **Executive coffee chats (2-3 per month):** Structured 20-minute conversations with leaders 2+ levels above. Prepare 2 thoughtful questions. Follow up with a brief thank-you and insight summary.175- **Peer mastermind group:** Form or join a group of 4-6 peers at similar career stages. Meet monthly. Each person brings one challenge; group problem-solves.176- **Structured feedback loops:** After every significant deliverable, ask your manager and one stakeholder: "What worked? What would you change?" Document and act on patterns.177- **Reverse mentoring:** Offer to mentor a senior leader on emerging technology (AI, cloud-native). Builds relationship while demonstrating expertise.178179**AI-fluency examples across the bands:**180- **70% (experiential):** ship one real LLM-API project end-to-end; introduce an AI-augmented workflow to your team and own its quality bar.181- **20% (social):** join or run an AI-practitioner peer group; reverse-mentor a senior leader on practical AI use.182- **10% (formal):** targeted current-generation AI/tooling learning — but a demonstrable project beats a generic badge (see Framework 6 and §5).183184#### 10% Formal Learning (Courses, Certifications, Events)185186**Certifications that matter in banking:**187- See Certification Strategy section below for detailed tiers188189**Conferences:**190- Sibos (SWIFT) — global banking infrastructure and payments191- Money20/20 — fintech, payments innovation192- Risk.net events — risk management, regulatory technology193- AWS re:Invent / Microsoft Ignite — cloud architecture (pick your platform)194- Internal bank conferences and town halls — visibility within the organization195196**Executive Education:**197- Short programs (1-2 weeks): MIT Sloan, Wharton, INSEAD — signal ambition and breadth198- Timing: pursue after reaching senior manager / VP level; earlier is premature199200---201202### 4. Milestone Sequencing203204Use for structuring any plan into time-bound phases with gate checks.205206#### 30-Day Plan (Quick Wins and Visibility)207208**Purpose:** Build momentum, establish presence, signal intent.209210Template:211| # | Action | By Date | Success Metric | Status |212|---|--------|---------|----------------|--------|213| 1 | [Visibility action — e.g., volunteer for a visible task] | [date] | [metric] | |214| 2 | [Quick win — e.g., solve a known pain point] | [date] | [metric] | |215| 3 | [Relationship action — e.g., schedule 4 coffee chats] | [date] | [metric] | |216| 4 | [Learning action — e.g., start certification study] | [date] | [metric] | |217218**Gate Check at Day 30:**219- Did I complete at least 3 of 4 actions?220- Did anyone senior notice? (If not, visibility strategy needs adjustment)221- What surprised me? What do I need to adjust?222223#### 90-Day Plan (Capability Building)224225**Purpose:** Deepen capabilities, expand network, take on a stretch assignment.226227Template:228| # | Action | By Date | Success Metric | Dependencies | Status |229|---|--------|---------|----------------|--------------|--------|230| 1 | [Stretch assignment — e.g., lead a workstream] | [date] | [metric] | [deps] | |231| 2 | [Certification milestone — e.g., pass exam] | [date] | [metric] | [deps] | |232| 3 | [Network expansion — e.g., build 3 new senior relationships] | [date] | [metric] | [deps] | |233| 4 | [Thought leadership — e.g., publish internal paper] | [date] | [metric] | [deps] | |234| 5 | [Feedback collection — e.g., 360 feedback from 5 stakeholders] | [date] | [metric] | [deps] | |235236**Gate Check at Day 90:**237- Am I on track for my annual target?238- Have I closed at least one significant gap?239- Do I have an executive sponsor or advocate? (If not, this is the #1 priority for the next 90 days)240241#### 365-Day Plan (Position Transformation)242243**Purpose:** Achieve a meaningful career shift — title change, grade promotion, new role, or significant scope expansion.244245Template:246| Quarter | Theme | Key Actions | Success Metrics |247|---------|-------|-------------|-----------------|248| Q1 | Foundation | [actions] | [metrics] |249| Q2 | Acceleration | [actions] | [metrics] |250| Q3 | Consolidation | [actions] | [metrics] |251| Q4 | Harvest | [actions] | [metrics] |252253**Gate Checks:**254- End of Q1: Are foundations in place? Adjust if behind.255- End of Q2: Is momentum building? If not, escalate effort or recalibrate target.256- End of Q3: Is the promotion/transition conversation happening? If not, force it.257- End of Q4: Did you achieve the target? If yes, set next year's target. If no, diagnose honestly.258259---260261### 5. Certification Strategy for Banking AI262263Use when the user asks about certifications, learning paths, or credentialing.264265**Guiding Principle:** Certifications that signal "deployable capability in regulated environments" are worth far more than generic AI badges.266267**AI-credential currency (2026).** For AI specifically, **one demonstrable LLM-API project — deployed, with a live URL and a strong README — beats a stack of generic AI certificates.** Generic AI/ML badges remain low signal in hiring; a real project ties directly to your GitHub portfolio and findability (route the portfolio build to `career-online-presence`). Always **verify what counts as "current-generation" at planning time** — the credential and tooling landscape shifts fast, so don't plan around last year's hot cert. *(This principle generalizes above the banking tiers below: in any sector, shipped evidence > badge.)*268269#### Tier 1 — High Signal (Prioritize These)270271| Certification | Why It Matters in Banking | Study Time |272|---------------|---------------------------|------------|273| AWS Solutions Architect Professional | Proves you can design production cloud architecture; banks are cloud-first now | 2-3 months |274| Azure AI Engineer Associate | Microsoft-heavy banks value this; shows applied AI, not just theory | 1-2 months |275| CISSP | Gold standard for security credibility; required for many senior roles in banking | 3-6 months |276277#### Tier 2 — Domain Credibility (Build on Tier 1)278279| Certification | Why It Matters in Banking | Study Time |280|---------------|---------------------------|------------|281| CRISC (Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control) | Shows you understand risk — the language of banking leadership | 2-4 months |282| CISM (Certified Information Security Manager) | Management-focused security; complements CISSP for leadership roles | 2-3 months |283| Kubernetes (CKA/CKAD) + Terraform Associate | Proves you can automate at scale; essential for platform/infrastructure leads | 1-2 months each |284285#### Tier 3 — Nice to Have (Low Priority)286287| Certification | Notes |288|---------------|-------|289| Generic AI/ML badges (Coursera, edX) | Low signal in hiring; fine for personal learning |290| Vendor-specific narrow certs (e.g., single-service AWS certs) | Too narrow to signal architectural capability |291| Project management (PMP, PRINCE2) | Only if moving into pure delivery management; otherwise signals wrong direction for technical leaders |292293**Sequencing Advice:**2941. Start with one Tier 1 cert that aligns with your bank's primary cloud platform2952. Add CISSP if pursuing any role with "security" or "risk" in the title or scope2963. Layer Tier 2 certs based on your specific gap analysis2974. Ignore Tier 3 unless you have completed Tier 1-2 and have spare capacity298299---300301### 6. AI-Fluency Competency Track302303Use to plan deliberate growth in AI capability — a first-class competency for technical roles now, not an optional extra. Three levels, each mapped to the 70/20/10 model:304305| Level | What it means | Plan it via |306|---|---|---|307| **L1 — Personal productivity** | Use AI tools well in your own work; know their failure modes | 10% formal + daily practice |308| **L2 — AI-augmented team workflows** | Introduce and govern AI-augmented workflows for your team; own the quality bar | 70% experiential + 20% social |309| **L3 — Builds / governs AI systems** | Design, ship, and govern AI systems and their controls (model risk, evaluation, accountability) | 70% experiential (real LLM-API project) + L2 foundation |310311**Planning rules:**312- Sequence L1 → L2 → L3; don't skip the foundation.313- **Anchor on a portable evidence trail** — a deployed LLM-API project (live URL + README) is the durable artifact; tie it to `career-online-presence`'s GitHub portfolio.314- **Role-volatility planning** — re-validate your AI-fluency target semi-annually (HARD RULE 6); the bar moves.315- Generalizes above banking: the levels apply in any sector; the worked examples just use a banking-tech lens.316317---318319## Output Format320321Every plan produced by this skill must include:3223231. **Career Target Statement** — one sentence, specific3242. **Planning Horizon** — which timeframe was selected3253. **The Plan** — table format with actions, dates, metrics, dependencies3264. **First Action This Week** — bolded, specific, achievable3275. **Review Schedule** — when the user will check progress3286. **Risks and Contingencies** — what could go wrong and what to do about it329330---331332## Anti-Patterns333334| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |335|---|---|---|336| Plans with vague timelines ("soon", "Q3-ish", "eventually") | No accountability, no urgency — plans without dates are wishes | Every action gets a specific date; every milestone gets a deadline with a review checkpoint |337| Stacking certifications without a strategic narrative | Random certs signal "learning for learning's sake" rather than deliberate career positioning | Sequence certs to build a coherent story aligned with your target role (e.g., cloud architect path, not scattered badges) |338| Planning without a success metric for each item | No way to know if the plan is working — "improve leadership" means nothing measurable | Every plan item needs a concrete metric: completed cert by date, visibility event count, sponsor meeting cadence |339| Creating a 3-year plan and never revisiting it | Career context changes — reorgs, market shifts, new opportunities — stale plans mislead | Build review gates: 30-day quick check, 90-day course correction, annual strategy refresh |340| Optimizing for promotion timeline without considering lateral moves | Linear "wait for promotion" thinking ignores that lateral moves often accelerate advancement | Always evaluate lateral moves, scope expansion, and strategic jumps alongside linear promotion paths |341| Building an AI-era plan with no AI-fluency track | Role mixes are shifting under AI; a plan that ignores AI capability ages fast and leaves the user exposed | Include the AI-Fluency Competency Track (Framework 6) and a portable evidence trail in any multi-year plan |