Github Safe Publisher

GitHub Safe Publisher

Overview

Use this skill to turn private project material into public-safe GitHub artifacts such as case studies, skill releases, README updates, demo notes, and example prompts. The skill produces a safety verdict and concrete next steps; it must not auto-commit, auto-push, publish, upload, send, or share anything without explicit human review.

Workflow

1. Identify the intended public artifact: skill, case study, README section, demo screenshot note, example prompt, template, or changelog.
2. Read references/public-safety-boundaries.md before deciding what can be reused, generalized, or removed.
3. Work from a copy or rewritten summary, not the private original. Prefer a sanitized draft folder before touching a public repo.
4. Remove or replace sensitive details: credentials, account data, client material, raw prompts, logs, databases, exports, local paths, private source, and screenshots with private UI.
5. Run the scanner on the proposed public folder:

python scripts/scan_public_safety.py path/to/public-candidate

6. Read references/release-workflow.md before staging changes.
7. Require manual review of git status --short, the unstaged diff, and the staged diff before any commit or push.

Verdicts

Return one of these verdicts in every review:

• BLOCK: Real secrets, credentials, raw private data, client-identifying material, local machine paths, databases, exports, logs, or unintended source files are present.
• REVIEW: The artifact is probably publishable after specific human checks or rewrites.
• READY: The artifact uses public-safe examples, passes the scanner, and has a clean manual diff review.

If blocked, explain the minimum fix. Do not rewrite blocked material into a public repo until the sensitive source is removed or generalized.

Sanitization Rules

• Replace real people, businesses, accounts, emails, phone numbers, domains, addresses, and project codenames with neutral examples.
• Replace credentials with placeholders such as YOUR_API_KEY_HERE.
• Convert raw private notes into public explanations; do not copy memory files, chat logs, prompts, or operational strategy verbatim.
• Publish patterns, workflows, and lessons. Keep implementation source, deployment details, private data, and system-of-record content private unless the user explicitly confirms they are public-safe.
• For screenshots, crop or recreate them with fake data. Do not publish account menus, browser tabs, analytics, emails, invoices, API dashboards, or file paths.

Scanner

Use scripts/scan_public_safety.py for a deterministic first pass. Treat it as a guardrail, not proof of safety.

Recommended commands:

python scripts/scan_public_safety.py path/to/candidate
python scripts/scan_public_safety.py path/to/candidate --json
python scripts/scan_public_safety.py path/to/candidate --no-baseline

The scanner checks risky filenames, file extensions, binary-like artifacts, local path patterns, credential terms, token formats, private-key blocks, and private/client wording. Folder scans use .public-safety-baseline.json when present to suppress known review findings; use --no-baseline to see the raw scan. A clean scan still requires human diff review.

Git Safety

• Never run broad staging commands such as git add . unless the user has already reviewed the whole repo state.
• Prefer staging named files only after inspecting them.
• Always inspect:

git status --short
git diff -- path/to/file
git diff --cached

• Do not commit or push unless the user explicitly asks for that action after the safety review is clean.

Output Format

When preparing or reviewing a public candidate, respond with:

1. Verdict: BLOCK, REVIEW, or READY.
2. Public artifact type and target repo/folder.
3. Files inspected or created.
4. Scanner result summary.
5. Remaining manual checks.
6. Exact next commands, if any, without auto-running publish actions.