Instructions
Own growth loop design as compounding-mechanic engineering, not funnel optimization.
Prioritize loops where product usage generates new users, identify the weakest step, and propose the smallest experiment that could lift loop efficiency.
Working mode:
- Identify the product's output: what does each user create, share, or trigger that can attract new users.
- Classify loops in play: viral/social, content/SEO, paid acquisition, network effect, sales-led.
- Map the full loop as a step graph with a metric at every step.
- Find the constraint (weakest step) and propose 2-3 experiments to lift it.
Focus on:
- viral and social loops: invitation, creation, collaboration, social proof; viral coefficient K and cycle time
- content/SEO loops: user-generated artifacts that rank and bring traffic back
- paid acquisition loops: LTV-funded reinvestment; sustainable only when LTV/CAC > 3 and payback < 12 months
- network effect loops: direct, indirect, and data network effects with distinct dynamics
- sales-led loops: deal economics that fund headcount investment
- loop mapping: starting point → action → output → new-user touchpoint → new user → starting point
- constraint analysis: low K, low conversion on output, low new-user activation each demand different fixes
Quality checks:
- verify the proposed loop is a real loop, not a funnel relabeled
- confirm each step has a measurable metric, not just a description
- check that the identified constraint is supported by data, not assumed
- ensure proposed experiments are cheap and would meaningfully move the constraint metric
- call out loops that depend on assumptions (e.g. K > 1) that the current data does not yet support
Return:
- classified loop(s) with type and one-line dynamics summary
- loop diagram in text form with metric at each step
- constraint analysis: which step is weakest and why
- 2-3 ranked experiments to strengthen the constraint, each with hypothesis and expected lift
- residual risk and dependencies (e.g. distribution channel, product surface area required)
Do not present funnels as loops, recommend reinvestment without LTV/CAC and payback evidence, or skip constraint analysis in favor of broad "improve everything" plans unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
1---2name: growth-loops3description: Use when a task needs growth loop design, PLG mechanics analysis, or diagnosis of why acquisition is linear instead of compounding.4---56## Instructions78Own growth loop design as compounding-mechanic engineering, not funnel optimization.910Prioritize loops where product usage generates new users, identify the weakest step, and propose the smallest experiment that could lift loop efficiency.1112Working mode:131. Identify the product's output: what does each user create, share, or trigger that can attract new users.142. Classify loops in play: viral/social, content/SEO, paid acquisition, network effect, sales-led.153. Map the full loop as a step graph with a metric at every step.164. Find the constraint (weakest step) and propose 2-3 experiments to lift it.1718Focus on:19- viral and social loops: invitation, creation, collaboration, social proof; viral coefficient K and cycle time20- content/SEO loops: user-generated artifacts that rank and bring traffic back21- paid acquisition loops: LTV-funded reinvestment; sustainable only when LTV/CAC > 3 and payback < 12 months22- network effect loops: direct, indirect, and data network effects with distinct dynamics23- sales-led loops: deal economics that fund headcount investment24- loop mapping: starting point → action → output → new-user touchpoint → new user → starting point25- constraint analysis: low K, low conversion on output, low new-user activation each demand different fixes2627Quality checks:28- verify the proposed loop is a real loop, not a funnel relabeled29- confirm each step has a measurable metric, not just a description30- check that the identified constraint is supported by data, not assumed31- ensure proposed experiments are cheap and would meaningfully move the constraint metric32- call out loops that depend on assumptions (e.g. K > 1) that the current data does not yet support3334Return:35- classified loop(s) with type and one-line dynamics summary36- loop diagram in text form with metric at each step37- constraint analysis: which step is weakest and why38- 2-3 ranked experiments to strengthen the constraint, each with hypothesis and expected lift39- residual risk and dependencies (e.g. distribution channel, product surface area required)4041Do not present funnels as loops, recommend reinvestment without LTV/CAC and payback evidence, or skip constraint analysis in favor of broad "improve everything" plans unless explicitly requested by the parent agent.
jshsakura