Brainstorm

Brainstorm

Overview

Turn ideas into fully formed designs through collaborative dialogue. Understand the project, ask questions one at a time, propose approaches, present the design, get approval, write the design doc.

When to Use Brainstorm

Use brainstorm when:

• Building a new feature, component, or abstraction
• Multiple approaches exist and trade-offs need exploring
• Scope is unclear
• The user asks for help with a design decision
• Starting a new project (greenfield — see mode below)

Skip brainstorm when:

• The change is mechanical (rename, config tweak, add a log line)
• The design is obvious and singular (only one sensible way to do it)
• The user already knows exactly what they want and just needs it built
• Iterating on already-designed work with no new decisions

When skipped, go straight to execute.

Mode: Greenfield vs Normal

Check first: does docs/SPEC.md exist?

• No SPEC.md → Greenfield mode. This is project initialization. Skip the design doc step. Hand off directly to the spec skill in interview mode — the SPEC.md is the design doc for initialization. Jump to "Greenfield Transition" below.
• SPEC.md exists → Normal mode. Follow the full checklist below.

Checklist (Normal Mode)

Create a task for each item and complete them in order:

1. Explore project context — check files, docs, recent commits, read docs/SPEC.md
2. Ask clarifying questions — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria
3. Propose 2-3 approaches — with trade-offs and your recommendation
4. Present design — in sections scaled to complexity, get user approval after each section
5. Write design doc — save the approved design to docs/designs/<feature-name>.md
6. Transition — hand off to the developer. Design doc is the session-boundary artifact. Plan is optional — only when the developer explicitly asks for it or the design is complex enough to warrant one.

Process Flow

Explore context → Ask questions → Propose approaches → Present design → User approves? → Write design doc → Done (developer decides next step)
                                                                        ↓
                                                             Revise and re-present

The Process

Understanding the idea:

• Check the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)
• Read docs/SPEC.md to understand current design decisions
• Check docs/designs/ for any in-flight feature design docs — SPEC.md may not reflect these yet
• Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
• Prefer multiple choice questions when possible
• Focus on: purpose, constraints, success criteria
• Always give recommendations backed by best practices — scalable architecture, good UI/UX patterns, clean reusable code, separation of concerns, industry conventions. Don't just ask bare questions, offer informed opinions

Exploring approaches:

• Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs
• Lead with your recommendation and explain why

Presenting the design:

• Scale each section to its complexity: a few sentences if straightforward, up to 200-300 words if nuanced
• Ask after each section whether it looks right
• Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing

After the Design (Normal Mode)

Once the design is approved, write it to docs/designs/<feature-name>.md. This file is the session-boundary artifact — a new agent session can pick up the plan step from here without needing the brainstorming context.

Design doc structure:

# <Feature Name>

## Context
[1-2 paragraphs. What is this? Why are we building it? How does it fit the existing system?]

## Goals
- [What success looks like]
- [Key outcomes]

## Non-Goals
- [What this explicitly does NOT cover]

## Design
[Architecture, components, data flow. Scale detail to complexity — a few paragraphs for simple features, more for complex ones.]

## Key Decisions
| Decision | Choice | Rationale |
|----------|--------|-----------|

## Rejected Alternatives
- [Approach X] — [why rejected]
- [Approach Y] — [why rejected]

## Edge Cases & Constraints
- [Known gotchas, performance, security]

## Open Questions
- [Anything unresolved — should be empty by the time brainstorm ends]

Include the "Rejected Alternatives" section so a fresh agent reading the design doc later knows what was already ruled out and why.

Do NOT update SPEC.md from brainstorm. SPEC.md is only updated via sync-docs or the spec skill.

Transition:

• Tell the user: "Design saved to docs/designs/<feature>.md."
• Do NOT suggest or push for /plan. The developer decides when a plan is needed.
• If the design is straightforward, the developer can go straight to execute using the design doc as context.
• If the design is complex, the developer will invoke /plan themselves (possibly with a stronger model).
• Only invoke the plan skill if the developer explicitly asks for it.

Greenfield Transition

When no docs/SPEC.md exists:

• Skip writing a design doc
• Hand off to the spec skill (Mode 2: initial spec interview)
• Tell the user: "No SPEC.md found. Handing off to spec skill to create the initial project spec — that becomes the design foundation."
• The spec skill interviews the user and writes SPEC.md directly
• Once SPEC.md exists, subsequent features go through normal mode

Key Principles

• One question at a time — don't overwhelm
• Multiple choice preferred — easier to answer
• YAGNI — strip unnecessary features
• Explore alternatives — always propose 2-3 approaches
• Incremental validation — get approval before moving on
• Be flexible — go back and clarify when something doesn't make sense