Citation Management

Citation Management

Overview

Manage citations systematically throughout the research and writing process. This skill provides tools and strategies for searching academic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed), extracting accurate metadata from multiple sources (CrossRef, PubMed, arXiv), validating citation information, and generating properly formatted BibTeX entries.

Critical for maintaining citation accuracy, avoiding reference errors, and ensuring reproducible research. Integrates seamlessly with the literature-review skill for comprehensive research workflows.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

• Searching for specific papers on Google Scholar or PubMed
• Converting DOIs, PMIDs, or arXiv IDs to properly formatted BibTeX
• Extracting complete metadata for citations (authors, title, journal, year, etc.)
• Validating existing citations for accuracy
• Cleaning and formatting BibTeX files
• Finding highly cited papers in a specific field
• Verifying that citation information matches the actual publication
• Building a bibliography for a manuscript or thesis
• Checking for duplicate citations
• Ensuring consistent citation formatting

Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics

When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication.

If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams:

• Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
• Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
• Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic

For new documents: Scientific schematics should be generated by default to visually represent key concepts, workflows, architectures, or relationships described in the text.

How to generate schematics:

python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png

The AI will automatically:

• Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
• Review and refine through multiple iterations
• Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
• Save outputs in the figures/ directory

When to add schematics:

• Citation workflow diagrams
• Literature search methodology flowcharts
• Reference management system architectures
• Citation style decision trees
• Database integration diagrams
• Any complex concept that benefits from visualization

For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.

Core Workflow

Citation management follows a systematic process:

Phase 1: Paper Discovery and Search

Goal: Find relevant papers using academic search engines.

Google Scholar Search

Google Scholar provides the most comprehensive coverage across disciplines.

Basic Search:

# Search for papers on a topic
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "CRISPR gene editing" \
  --limit 50 \
  --output results.json

# Search with year filter
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "machine learning protein folding" \
  --year-start 2020 \
  --year-end 2024 \
  --limit 100 \
  --output ml_proteins.json

Advanced Search Strategies (see references/google_scholar_search.md):

• Use quotation marks for exact phrases: "deep learning"
• Search by author: author:LeCun
• Search in title: intitle:"neural networks"
• Exclude terms: machine learning -survey
• Find highly cited papers using sort options
• Filter by date ranges to get recent work

Best Practices:

• Use specific, targeted search terms
• Include key technical terms and acronyms
• Filter by recent years for fast-moving fields
• Check "Cited by" to find seminal papers
• Export top results for further analysis

PubMed Search

PubMed specializes in biomedical and life sciences literature (35+ million citations).

Basic Search:

# Search PubMed
python scripts/search_pubmed.py "Alzheimer's disease treatment" \
  --limit 100 \
  --output alzheimers.json

# Search with MeSH terms and filters
python scripts/search_pubmed.py \
  --query '"Alzheimer Disease"[MeSH] AND "Drug Therapy"[MeSH]' \
  --date-start 2020 \
  --date-end 2024 \
  --publication-types "Clinical Trial,Review" \
  --output alzheimers_trials.json

Advanced PubMed Queries (see references/pubmed_search.md):

• Use MeSH terms: "Diabetes Mellitus"[MeSH]
• Field tags: "cancer"[Title], "Smith J"[Author]
• Boolean operators: AND, OR, NOT
• Date filters: 2020:2024[Publication Date]
• Publication types: "Review"[Publication Type]
• Combine with E-utilities API for automation

Best Practices:

• Use MeSH Browser to find correct controlled vocabulary
• Construct complex queries in PubMed Advanced Search Builder first
• Include multiple synonyms with OR
• Retrieve PMIDs for easy metadata extraction
• Export to JSON or directly to BibTeX

Phase 2: Metadata Extraction

Goal: Convert paper identifiers (DOI, PMID, arXiv ID) to complete, accurate metadata.

Quick DOI to BibTeX Conversion

For single DOIs, use the quick conversion tool:

# Convert single DOI
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

# Convert multiple DOIs from a file
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py --input dois.txt --output references.bib

# Different output formats
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/nature12345 --format json

Comprehensive Metadata Extraction

For DOIs, PMIDs, arXiv IDs, or URLs:

# Extract from DOI
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --doi 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

# Extract from PMID
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --pmid 34265844

# Extract from arXiv ID
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --arxiv 2103.14030

# Extract from URL
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --url "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2"

# Batch extraction from file (mixed identifiers)
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --input identifiers.txt --output citations.bib

Metadata Sources (see references/metadata_extraction.md):

1. CrossRef API: Primary source for DOIs

   • Comprehensive metadata for journal articles
   • Publisher-provided information
   • Includes authors, title, journal, volume, pages, dates
   • Free, no API key required

2. PubMed E-utilities: Biomedical literature

   • Official NCBI metadata
   • Includes MeSH terms, abstracts
   • PMID and PMCID identifiers
   • Free, API key recommended for high volume

3. arXiv API: Preprints in physics, math, CS, q-bio

   • Complete metadata for preprints
   • Version tracking
   • Author affiliations
   • Free, open access

4. DataCite API: Research datasets, software, other resources

   • Metadata for non-traditional scholarly outputs
   • DOIs for datasets and code
   • Free access

What Gets Extracted:

• Required fields: author, title, year
• Journal articles: journal, volume, number, pages, DOI
• Books: publisher, ISBN, edition
• Conference papers: booktitle, conference location, pages
• Preprints: repository (arXiv, bioRxiv), preprint ID
• Additional: abstract, keywords, URL

Phase 2.5: Metadata Enrichment via Web Search (MANDATORY)

Goal: Detect and fill in any missing metadata fields using web search. This phase runs AFTER extraction and BEFORE formatting to ensure every BibTeX entry is complete.

Why This Is Critical: Metadata extraction from APIs (CrossRef, PubMed, arXiv) sometimes returns incomplete records — missing volume, pages, issue number, or DOI. These gaps must be filled before the bibliography is considered ready.

Step 1: Scan for Incomplete Entries

After extracting metadata, scan the BibTeX file for entries missing key fields:

Fields to check per entry type:

Any @article entry missing volume, pages, or doi is considered incomplete and must be enriched.

Step 2: Web Search for Missing Metadata

For each incomplete entry, use the parallel-web skill to search for the missing information:

Option A — Search by title and author (best for finding DOI):

parallel-cli search "FIRST_AUTHOR TITLE JOURNAL_NAME volume pages DOI" \
  --json --max-results 10 \
  -o sources/search_citation_CITATIONKEY.json

Option B — Extract from DOI page (best when DOI is known but volume/pages missing):

parallel-cli extract "https://doi.org/10.XXXX/YYYY" --json \
  --objective "extract complete citation metadata: volume, issue, pages, publication date" \
  -o sources/extract_doi_CITATIONKEY.json

Option C — Search CrossRef API directly (programmatic, fast):

parallel-cli search "crossref DOI metadata FIRST_AUTHOR TITLE" \
  --json --max-results 10 \
  -o sources/search_crossref_CITATIONKEY.json

Option D — Search Google Scholar (fallback for hard-to-find papers):

parallel-cli search "google scholar FIRST_AUTHOR TITLE YEAR complete citation" \
  --json --max-results 10 \
  -o sources/search_scholar_CITATIONKEY.json

Step 3: Update BibTeX Entries

After finding the missing metadata:

1. Open references.bib
2. Add the missing fields to the incomplete entry
3. Verify the found metadata is consistent with existing fields (same author, title, year)
4. Log each fix:

   [HH:MM:SS] METADATA ENRICHED: [CitationKey] - added volume={X}, pages={Y--Z}, doi={10.XXX/YYY} ✅
   

Step 4: Handle Unfindable Metadata

If metadata genuinely cannot be found after web search (very old paper, obscure conference, etc.):

1. Add a note field to the BibTeX entry explaining the gap:

   note = {Volume and pages not available — published online only}
   

2. Log the exception:

   [HH:MM:SS] METADATA INCOMPLETE: [CitationKey] - pages unavailable (online-only publication) ⚠️
   

3. These exceptions should be rare — most modern papers have complete metadata findable via web search.

Quick Reference: Common Missing Fields and Where to Find Them

Phase 3: BibTeX Formatting

Goal: Generate clean, properly formatted BibTeX entries.

Understanding BibTeX Entry Types

See references/bibtex_formatting.md for complete guide.

Common Entry Types:

• @article: Journal articles (most common)
• @book: Books
• @inproceedings: Conference papers
• @incollection: Book chapters
• @phdthesis: Dissertations
• @misc: Preprints, software, datasets

Required Fields by Type:

@article{citationkey,
  author  = {Last1, First1 and Last2, First2},
  title   = {Article Title},
  journal = {Journal Name},
  year    = {2024},
  volume  = {10},
  number  = {3},
  pages   = {123--145},
  doi     = {10.1234/example}
}

@inproceedings{citationkey,
  author    = {Last, First},
  title     = {Paper Title},
  booktitle = {Conference Name},
  year      = {2024},
  pages     = {1--10}
}

@book{citationkey,
  author    = {Last, First},
  title     = {Book Title},
  publisher = {Publisher Name},
  year      = {2024}
}

Formatting and Cleaning

Use the formatter to standardize BibTeX files:

# Format and clean BibTeX file
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
  --output formatted_references.bib

# Sort entries by citation key
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
  --sort key \
  --output sorted_references.bib

# Sort by year (newest first)
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
  --sort year \
  --descending \
  --output sorted_references.bib

# Remove duplicates
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
  --deduplicate \
  --output clean_references.bib

# Validate and report issues
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
  --validate \
  --report validation_report.txt

Formatting Operations:

• Standardize field order
• Consistent indentation and spacing
• Proper capitalization in titles (protected with {})
• Standardized author name format
• Consistent citation key format
• Remove unnecessary fields
• Fix common errors (missing commas, braces)

Phase 4: Citation Validation

Goal: Verify all citations are accurate and complete.

Comprehensive Validation

# Validate BibTeX file
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib

# Validate against a venue standard (e.g., Nature, NeurIPS, Literature Review)
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --venue nature
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --venue neurips
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --venue review

# Validate with custom minimum citation count
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --min-count 40

# Check references against a written manuscript file (detect missing or unused citations)
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --manuscript paper.md

# Generate detailed validation report
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib \
  --venue nature \
  --manuscript paper.md \
  --report validation_report.json \
  --verbose

Validation Checks (see references/citation_validation.md):

1. DOI Verification:

   • DOI resolves correctly via doi.org
   • Metadata matches between BibTeX and CrossRef
   • No broken or invalid DOIs

2. Required Fields:

   • All required fields present for entry type
   • No empty or missing critical information
   • Author names properly formatted

3. Data Consistency:

   • Year is valid (4 digits, reasonable range)
   • Volume/number are numeric
   • Pages formatted correctly (e.g., 123--145)
   • URLs are accessible

4. Duplicate Detection:

   • Same DOI used multiple times
   • Similar titles (possible duplicates)
   • Same author/year/title combinations

5. Format Compliance:

   • Valid BibTeX syntax
   • Proper bracing and quoting
   • Citation keys are unique
   • Special characters handled correctly

Validation Output:

{
  "total_entries": 150,
  "valid_entries": 145,
  "errors": [
    {
      "citation_key": "Smith2023",
      "error_type": "missing_field",
      "field": "journal",
      "severity": "high"
    },
    {
      "citation_key": "Jones2022",
      "error_type": "invalid_doi",
      "doi": "10.1234/broken",
      "severity": "high"
    }
  ],
  "warnings": [
    {
      "citation_key": "Brown2021",
      "warning_type": "possible_duplicate",
      "duplicate_of": "Brown2021a",
      "severity": "medium"
    }
  ]
}

Citation Count Standards by Venue

Citations must always be high in number based on standards for journal and conference publications in the venue of choice or recommendation. Never settle for a sparse reference list; establish an authoritative, rich context with dense, verified citations.

Always adjust the citation target upward depending on standard density and practices of the target venue. Avoid 'lazy' citation over-repetition — do not repeatedly cite the same 1 or 2 papers to support multiple unrelated claims; draw from a diverse, high-quality set of reputable references.

Enforce these standards programmatically with validate_citations.py --venue <venue> or --min-count <N>.

Mandatory Post-Writing Reference Checks (Non-Negotiable)

Once the entire scientific report or paper has been drafted and written, perform a comprehensive post-writing verification of all citations before compiling the final deliverables:

1. Verify No Missing or Unresolved Citations: Check the draft or compiled document to ensure that every in-text citation correctly resolves to a reference in references.bib. There must be ZERO broken citation keys, missing identifiers, or unresolved references (e.g., [?] or [citation needed]).
2. Verify No Unused (Dangling) Bibliography Entries: Check that every entry in references.bib is actually cited in the body of the report. Remove any unused entries to keep the bibliography perfectly clean.
3. Verify Citation Quantity Against Target Standards: Ensure the final citation count meets or exceeds the high standard of the chosen or recommended venue (see table above). If the count is below standard, perform additional literature search first, find high-quality papers, and integrate them into appropriate sections.
4. Verify Metadata Completeness: Confirm that all cited entries contain complete, fully-verified fields (all author names, complete journal/conference names, exact year, volume, issue, page range, and valid DOI).

Run all of these checks in one command:

python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib \
  --venue <venue> \
  --manuscript paper.md \
  --report post_writing_check.json

Phase 5: Integration with Writing Workflow

Building References for Manuscripts

Complete workflow for creating a bibliography:

# 1. Search for papers on your topic
python scripts/search_pubmed.py \
  '"CRISPR-Cas Systems"[MeSH] AND "Gene Editing"[MeSH]' \
  --date-start 2020 \
  --limit 200 \
  --output crispr_papers.json

# 2. Extract DOIs from search results and convert to BibTeX
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
  --input crispr_papers.json \
  --output crispr_refs.bib

# 3. Add specific papers by DOI
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/nature12345 >> crispr_refs.bib
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1126/science.abcd1234 >> crispr_refs.bib

# 4. Format and clean the BibTeX file
python scripts/format_bibtex.py crispr_refs.bib \
  --deduplicate \
  --sort year \
  --descending \
  --output references.bib

# 5. Validate all citations
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib \
  --auto-fix \
  --report validation.json \
  --output final_references.bib

# 6. Review validation report and fix any remaining issues
cat validation.json

# 7. Use in your LaTeX document
# \bibliography{final_references}

Integration with Literature Review Skill

This skill complements the literature-review skill:

Literature Review Skill → Systematic search and synthesis Citation Management Skill → Technical citation handling

Combined Workflow:

1. Use literature-review for comprehensive multi-database search
2. Use citation-management to extract and validate all citations
3. Use literature-review to synthesize findings thematically
4. Use citation-management to verify final bibliography accuracy

# After completing literature review
# Verify all citations in the review document
python scripts/validate_citations.py my_review_references.bib --report review_validation.json

# Format for specific citation style if needed
python scripts/format_bibtex.py my_review_references.bib \
  --style nature \
  --output formatted_refs.bib

Search Strategies

Google Scholar Best Practices

Finding Seminal and High-Impact Papers (CRITICAL):

Always prioritize papers based on citation count, venue quality, and author reputation:

Citation Count Thresholds:

Venue Quality Tiers:

• Tier 1 (Prefer): Nature, Science, Cell, NEJM, Lancet, JAMA, PNAS
• Tier 2 (High Priority): Impact Factor >10, top conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR)
• Tier 3 (Good): Specialized journals (IF 5-10)
• Tier 4 (Sparingly): Lower-impact peer-reviewed venues

Author Reputation Indicators:

• Senior researchers with h-index >40
• Multiple publications in Tier-1 venues
• Leadership at recognized institutions
• Awards and editorial positions

Search Strategies for High-Impact Papers:

• Sort by citation count (most cited first)
• Look for review articles from Tier-1 journals for overview
• Check "Cited by" for impact assessment and recent follow-up work
• Use citation alerts for tracking new citations to key papers
• Filter by top venues using source:Nature or source:Science
• Search for papers by known field leaders using author:LastName

Advanced Operators (full list in references/google_scholar_search.md):

"exact phrase"           # Exact phrase matching
author:lastname          # Search by author
intitle:keyword          # Search in title only
source:journal           # Search specific journal
-exclude                 # Exclude terms
OR                       # Alternative terms
2020..2024              # Year range

Example Searches:

# Find recent reviews on a topic
"CRISPR" intitle:review 2023..2024

# Find papers by specific author on topic
author:Church "synthetic biology"

# Find highly cited foundational work
"deep learning" 2012..2015 sort:citations

# Exclude surveys and focus on methods
"protein folding" -survey -review intitle:method

PubMed Best Practices

Using MeSH Terms: MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) provides controlled vocabulary for precise searching.

1. Find MeSH terms at https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/search
2. Use in queries: "Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2"[MeSH]
3. Combine with keywords for comprehensive coverage

Field Tags:

[Title]              # Search in title only
[Title/Abstract]     # Search in title or abstract
[Author]             # Search by author name
[Journal]            # Search specific journal
[Publication Date]   # Date range
[Publication Type]   # Article type
[MeSH]              # MeSH term

Building Complex Queries:

# Clinical trials on diabetes treatment published recently
"Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2"[MeSH] AND "Drug Therapy"[MeSH] 
AND "Clinical Trial"[Publication Type] AND 2020:2024[Publication Date]

# Reviews on CRISPR in specific journal
"CRISPR-Cas Systems"[MeSH] AND "Nature"[Journal] AND "Review"[Publication Type]

# Specific author's recent work
"Smith AB"[Author] AND cancer[Title/Abstract] AND 2022:2024[Publication Date]

E-utilities for Automation: The scripts use NCBI E-utilities API for programmatic access:

• ESearch: Search and retrieve PMIDs
• EFetch: Retrieve full metadata
• ESummary: Get summary information
• ELink: Find related articles

See references/pubmed_search.md for complete API documentation.

Tools and Scripts

search_google_scholar.py

Search Google Scholar and export results.

Features:

• Automated searching with rate limiting
• Pagination support
• Year range filtering
• Export to JSON or BibTeX
• Citation count information

Usage:

# Basic search
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "quantum computing"

# Advanced search with filters
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "quantum computing" \
  --year-start 2020 \
  --year-end 2024 \
  --limit 100 \
  --sort-by citations \
  --output quantum_papers.json

# Export directly to BibTeX
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "machine learning" \
  --limit 50 \
  --format bibtex \
  --output ml_papers.bib

search_pubmed.py

Search PubMed using E-utilities API.

Features:

• Complex query support (MeSH, field tags, Boolean)
• Date range filtering
• Publication type filtering
• Batch retrieval with metadata
• Export to JSON or BibTeX

Usage:

# Simple keyword search
python scripts/search_pubmed.py "CRISPR gene editing"

# Complex query with filters
python scripts/search_pubmed.py \
  --query '"CRISPR-Cas Systems"[MeSH] AND "therapeutic"[Title/Abstract]' \
  --date-start 2020-01-01 \
  --date-end 2024-12-31 \
  --publication-types "Clinical Trial,Review" \
  --limit 200 \
  --output crispr_therapeutic.json

# Export to BibTeX
python scripts/search_pubmed.py "Alzheimer's disease" \
  --limit 100 \
  --format bibtex \
  --output alzheimers.bib

extract_metadata.py

Extract complete metadata from paper identifiers.

Features:

• Supports DOI, PMID, arXiv ID, URL
• Queries CrossRef, PubMed, arXiv APIs
• Handles multiple identifier types
• Batch processing
• Multiple output formats

Usage:

# Single DOI
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --doi 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

# Single PMID
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --pmid 34265844

# Single arXiv ID
python scripts/extract_metadata.py --arxiv 2103.14030

# From URL
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
  --url "https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2"

# Batch processing (file with one identifier per line)
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
  --input paper_ids.txt \
  --output references.bib

# Different output formats
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
  --doi 10.1038/nature12345 \
  --format json  # or bibtex, yaml

validate_citations.py

Validate BibTeX entries for accuracy, completeness, citation count standard compliance, and manuscript integration.

Features:

• DOI verification via doi.org and CrossRef
• Required field checking
• Duplicate detection
• Format validation
• Publication standard citation count checks against specified venues (Nature, NeurIPS, review, etc.) or custom thresholds.
• Mandatory post-writing checks matching manuscript citations (Markdown or LaTeX) with defined BibTeX entries to detect unresolved/missing or unused references.
• Detailed reporting

Usage:

# Basic validation
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib

# Validate against a venue standard (e.g., Nature, NeurIPS, Literature Review)
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --venue nature
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --venue neurips
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --venue review

# Validate with custom minimum citation count
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --min-count 40

# Check references against a written manuscript file (detect missing or unused citations)
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --manuscript paper.md

# Combined full validation
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib \
  --venue nature \
  --manuscript paper.md \
  --report validation_report.json \
  --verbose

format_bibtex.py

Format and clean BibTeX files.

Features:

• Standardize formatting
• Sort entries (by key, year, author)
• Remove duplicates
• Validate syntax
• Fix common errors
• Enforce citation key conventions

Usage:

# Basic formatting
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib

# Sort by year (newest first)
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
  --sort year \
  --descending \
  --output sorted_refs.bib

# Remove duplicates
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
  --deduplicate \
  --output clean_refs.bib

# Complete cleanup
python scripts/format_bibtex.py references.bib \
  --deduplicate \
  --sort year \
  --validate \
  --auto-fix \
  --output final_refs.bib

doi_to_bibtex.py

Quick DOI to BibTeX conversion.

Features:

• Fast single DOI conversion
• Batch processing
• Multiple output formats
• Clipboard support

Usage:

# Single DOI
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

# Multiple DOIs
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py \
  10.1038/nature12345 \
  10.1126/science.abc1234 \
  10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.001

# From file (one DOI per line)
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py --input dois.txt --output references.bib

# Copy to clipboard
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/nature12345 --clipboard

Best Practices

Search Strategy

1. Start broad, then narrow:

   • Begin with general terms to understand the field
   • Refine with specific keywords and filters
   • Use synonyms and related terms

2. Use multiple sources:

   • Google Scholar for comprehensive coverage
   • PubMed for biomedical focus
   • arXiv for preprints
   • Combine results for completeness

3. Leverage citations:

   • Check "Cited by" for seminal papers
   • Review references from key papers
   • Use citation networks to discover related work

4. Document your searches:

   • Save search queries and dates
   • Record number of results
   • Note any filters or restrictions applied

Metadata Extraction

1. Always use DOIs when available:

   • Most reliable identifier
   • Permanent link to the publication
   • Best metadata source via CrossRef

2. Verify extracted metadata:

   • Check author names are correct
   • Verify journal/conference names
   • Confirm publication year
   • Validate page numbers and volume

3. Handle edge cases:

   • Preprints: Include repository and ID
   • Preprints later published: Use published version
   • Conference papers: Include conference name and location
   • Book chapters: Include book title and editors

4. Maintain consistency:

   • Use consistent author name format
   • Standardize journal abbreviations
   • Use same DOI format (URL preferred)

BibTeX Quality

1. Follow conventions:

   • Use meaningful citation keys (FirstAuthor2024keyword)
   • Protect capitalization in titles with {}
   • Use -- for page ranges (not single dash)
   • Include DOI field for all modern publications

2. Keep it clean:

   • Remove unnecessary fields
   • No redundant information
   • Consistent formatting
   • Validate syntax regularly

3. Organize systematically:

   • Sort by year or topic
   • Group related papers
   • Use separate files for different projects
   • Merge carefully to avoid duplicates

Validation

1. Validate early and often:

   • Check citations when adding them
   • Validate complete bibliography before submission
   • Re-validate after any manual edits

2. Fix issues promptly:

   • Broken DOIs: Find correct identifier
   • Missing fields: Extract from original source
   • Duplicates: Choose best version, remove others
   • Format errors: Use auto-fix when safe

3. Manual review for critical citations:

   • Verify key papers cited correctly
   • Check author names match publication
   • Confirm page numbers and volume
   • Ensure URLs are current

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

1. Single source bias: Only using Google Scholar or PubMed

   • Solution: Search multiple databases for comprehensive coverage

2. Accepting metadata blindly: Not verifying extracted information

   • Solution: Spot-check extracted metadata against original sources

3. Ignoring DOI errors: Broken or incorrect DOIs in bibliography

   • Solution: Run validation before final submission

4. Inconsistent formatting: Mixed citation key styles, formatting

   • Solution: Use format_bibtex.py to standardize

5. Duplicate entries: Same paper cited multiple times with different keys

   • Solution: Use duplicate detection in validation

6. Missing required fields: Incomplete BibTeX entries (volume, pages, DOI missing)

   • Solution: Run Phase 2.5 metadata enrichment — web search for every missing field before proceeding. NEVER leave an @article entry without volume, pages, and DOI.

7. Outdated preprints: Citing preprint when published version exists

   • Solution: Check if preprints have been published, update to journal version

8. Special character issues: Broken LaTeX compilation due to characters

   • Solution: Use proper escaping or Unicode in BibTeX

9. No validation before submission: Submitting with citation errors

   • Solution: Always run validation as final check

10. Manual BibTeX entry: Typing entries by hand

    • Solution: Always extract from metadata sources using scripts

Example Workflows

Example 1: Building a Bibliography for a Paper

# Step 1: Find key papers on your topic
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "transformer neural networks" \
  --year-start 2017 \
  --limit 50 \
  --output transformers_gs.json

python scripts/search_pubmed.py "deep learning medical imaging" \
  --date-start 2020 \
  --limit 50 \
  --output medical_dl_pm.json

# Step 2: Extract metadata from search results
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
  --input transformers_gs.json \
  --output transformers.bib

python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
  --input medical_dl_pm.json \
  --output medical.bib

# Step 3: Add specific papers you already know
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 >> specific.bib
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py 10.1126/science.aam9317 >> specific.bib

# Step 4: Combine all BibTeX files
cat transformers.bib medical.bib specific.bib > combined.bib

# Step 5: Format and deduplicate
python scripts/format_bibtex.py combined.bib \
  --deduplicate \
  --sort year \
  --descending \
  --output formatted.bib

# Step 6: Validate
python scripts/validate_citations.py formatted.bib \
  --auto-fix \
  --report validation.json \
  --output final_references.bib

# Step 7: Review any issues
cat validation.json | grep -A 3 '"errors"'

# Step 8: Use in LaTeX
# \bibliography{final_references}

Example 2: Converting a List of DOIs

# You have a text file with DOIs (one per line)
# dois.txt contains:
# 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
# 10.1126/science.aam9317
# 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.001

# Convert all to BibTeX
python scripts/doi_to_bibtex.py --input dois.txt --output references.bib

# Validate the result
python scripts/validate_citations.py references.bib --verbose

Example 3: Cleaning an Existing BibTeX File

# You have a messy BibTeX file from various sources
# Clean it up systematically

# Step 1: Format and standardize
python scripts/format_bibtex.py messy_references.bib \
  --output step1_formatted.bib

# Step 2: Remove duplicates
python scripts/format_bibtex.py step1_formatted.bib \
  --deduplicate \
  --output step2_deduplicated.bib

# Step 3: Validate and auto-fix
python scripts/validate_citations.py step2_deduplicated.bib \
  --auto-fix \
  --output step3_validated.bib

# Step 4: Sort by year
python scripts/format_bibtex.py step3_validated.bib \
  --sort year \
  --descending \
  --output clean_references.bib

# Step 5: Final validation report
python scripts/validate_citations.py clean_references.bib \
  --report final_validation.json \
  --verbose

# Review report
cat final_validation.json

Example 4: Finding and Citing Seminal Papers

# Find highly cited papers on a topic
python scripts/search_google_scholar.py "AlphaFold protein structure" \
  --year-start 2020 \
  --year-end 2024 \
  --sort-by citations \
  --limit 20 \
  --output alphafold_seminal.json

# Extract the top 10 by citation count
# (script will have included citation counts in JSON)

# Convert to BibTeX
python scripts/extract_metadata.py \
  --input alphafold_seminal.json \
  --output alphafold_refs.bib

# The BibTeX file now contains the most influential papers

Integration with Other Skills

Literature Review Skill

Citation Management provides the technical infrastructure for Literature Review:

• Literature Review: Multi-database systematic search and synthesis
• Citation Management: Metadata extraction and validation

Combined workflow:

1. Use literature-review for systematic search methodology
2. Use citation-management to extract and validate citations
3. Use literature-review to synthesize findings
4. Use citation-management to ensure bibliography accuracy

Scientific Writing Skill

Citation Management ensures accurate references for Scientific Writing:

• Export validated BibTeX for use in LaTeX manuscripts
• Verify citations match publication standards
• Format references according to journal requirements

Venue Templates Skill

Citation Management works with Venue Templates for submission-ready manuscripts:

• Different venues require different citation styles
• Generate properly formatted references
• Validate citations meet venue requirements

Resources

Bundled Resources

References (in references/):

• google_scholar_search.md: Complete Google Scholar search guide
• pubmed_search.md: PubMed and E-utilities API documentation
• metadata_extraction.md: Metadata sources and field requirements
• citation_validation.md: Validation criteria and quality checks
• bibtex_formatting.md: BibTeX entry types and formatting rules

Scripts (in scripts/):

• search_google_scholar.py: Google Scholar search automation
• search_pubmed.py: PubMed E-utilities API client
• extract_metadata.py: Universal metadata extractor
• validate_citations.py: Citation validation and verification
• format_bibtex.py: BibTeX formatter and cleaner
• doi_to_bibtex.py: Quick DOI to BibTeX converter

Assets (in assets/):

• bibtex_template.bib: Example BibTeX entries for all types
• citation_checklist.md: Quality assurance checklist

External Resources

Search Engines:

• Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/
• PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
• PubMed Advanced Search: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/advanced/

Metadata APIs:

• CrossRef API: https://api.crossref.org/
• PubMed E-utilities: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25501/
• arXiv API: https://arxiv.org/help/api/
• DataCite API: https://api.datacite.org/

Tools and Validators:

• MeSH Browser: https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/search
• DOI Resolver: https://doi.org/
• BibTeX Format: http://www.bibtex.org/Format/

Citation Styles:

• BibTeX documentation: http://www.bibtex.org/
• LaTeX bibliography management: https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Bibliography_management

Dependencies

Required Python Packages

# Core dependencies
pip install requests  # HTTP requests for APIs
pip install bibtexparser  # BibTeX parsing and formatting
pip install biopython  # PubMed E-utilities access

# Optional (for Google Scholar)
pip install scholarly  # Google Scholar API wrapper
# or
pip install selenium  # For more robust Scholar scraping

Optional Tools

# For advanced validation
pip install crossref-commons  # Enhanced CrossRef API access
pip install pylatexenc  # LaTeX special character handling

Summary

The citation-management skill provides:

1. Comprehensive search capabilities for Google Scholar and PubMed
2. Automated metadata extraction from DOI, PMID, arXiv ID, URLs
3. Citation validation with DOI verification and completeness checking
4. BibTeX formatting with standardization and cleaning tools
5. Quality assurance through validation and reporting
6. Integration with scientific writing workflow
7. Reproducibility through documented search and extraction methods

Use this skill to maintain accurate, complete citations throughout your research and ensure publication-ready bibliographies.