Corporate Restructuring & Turnaround
Required Inputs
Company Overview : Name, industry, revenue, headcount, and corporate structure.
Nature of Distress : Liquidity crisis, overleveraged balance sheet, operational underperformance, or combination.
Urgency Level : Weeks of cash remaining (critical if <8 weeks); upcoming debt maturities or covenant test dates.
Capital Structure : All debt tranches (senior secured, unsecured, mezzanine, convertibles), equity, and intercompany obligations.
Key Stakeholders : Identity of major creditors, equity holders, management team, key customers, and key suppliers.
Execution Steps
1. Triage Assessment
Before anything else, determine the severity and time horizon:
Indicator
Green (Stable)
Amber (Stressed)
Red (Distressed)
Score
Cash runway
>6 months
3-6 months
<3 months
Debt maturity
>12 months
6-12 months
<6 months
Covenant compliance
In compliance
Waiver needed this quarter
Already in breach
EBITDA trend
Growing
Flat or declining <10%
Declining >10% YoY
Customer concentration
Top 5 <30% revenue
Top 5 = 30-50% revenue
Top 5 >50% revenue
Supplier risk
All stable
1-2 at risk
Key supplier threatening COD/termination
Management capacity
Strong team
Gaps in key roles
CEO/CFO departure or capability gap
Stakeholder alignment
Aligned
Some tension
Active creditor conflict
Scoring : Green=1, Amber=2, Red=3. Total score 8-12 = Stressed (proactive restructuring). 13-18 = Distressed (urgent restructuring). 19-24 = Critical (immediate intervention, formal proceedings likely).
2. 13-Week Cash Flow Model
The 13-week cash flow (TWCF) is the foundational tool for any restructuring. It tracks weekly liquidity on a receipts-and-disbursements basis.
Model Structure
Line Item
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
...
Week 13
Total
Opening cash balance
Receipts
Customer collections
Other receipts
Total receipts
Disbursements
Payroll and benefits
Rent and occupancy
Raw materials / COGS
Utilities
Insurance
Professional fees
Tax payments
Interest payments
Debt amortization
CapEx (critical only)
Other disbursements
Total disbursements
Net cash flow
Closing cash balance
Revolver availability
Total liquidity
Minimum cash threshold
Liquidity surplus / (deficit)
Critical rules for the 13-week model :
Cash basis only (when cash moves, not when revenue is recognized).
Weekly granularity (not monthly; weekly matters in distress).
Bottom-up build from AP aging, AR aging, payroll register, and committed payments.
Identify the liquidity trough (lowest point) and the week it occurs.
Model a stress case (10-20% haircut on collections, acceleration of payables).
Use the financial-modeling skill for detailed projection model construction when extending beyond 13 weeks.
3. Stakeholder Mapping
Map every stakeholder by their economic interest and leverage:
Stakeholder
Claim ($M)
Priority
Security
Leverage
Current Posture
Strategy
Senior secured lender(s)
1st priority
[Collateral description]
High (can enforce)
[Supportive/Neutral/Hostile]
[Approach]
Second lien / mezzanine
2nd priority
[Collateral description]
Medium
Unsecured creditors
General unsecured
None
Low individually; high collectively
Bondholders
Per indenture
Per indenture
Depends on indenture trustee
Trade creditors (key)
General unsecured
None
Operational leverage (supply disruption)
Pension fund / employees
Priority per jurisdiction
Statutory
Regulatory and political
Equity holders
Residual
None
Low in distress; Board control
Management team
N/A
N/A
Operational knowledge
Key customers
N/A
N/A
Revenue concentration
Fulcrum Security Analysis
Identify the fulcrum security (the most senior class of capital that is impaired):
Enterprise Value (going concern) = $[X]M
Less: Senior secured debt = ($[A]M) --> Fully covered? [Y/N]
Remaining value for junior claims = $[B]M
Less: Second lien / mezzanine = ($[C]M) --> Fully covered? [Y/N]
Remaining value for unsecured = $[D]M
Less: Unsecured claims = ($[E]M) --> Recovery = [D/E x 100]%
Equity value = $[F]M --> (often $0 in distress)
The fulcrum security holder has the most influence in restructuring negotiations.
4. Restructuring Options Analysis
Evaluate each option systematically:
Option
Description
Pros
Cons
Best When
Operational restructuring
Cost reduction, revenue improvement, working capital optimization
Preserves enterprise; no creditor impairment
Slow; may be insufficient if leverage is the problem
Operational underperformance with manageable debt
Out-of-court financial restructuring
Consensual debt renegotiation (amend & extend, covenant relief, debt-for-equity swap)
Faster; lower cost; less stigma; management retains control
Requires unanimous or supermajority creditor consent; holdout risk
Limited number of creditor groups; alignment achievable
Pre-packaged bankruptcy
Agreement reached pre-filing; Chapter 11 for confirmation only
Speed of out-of-court + binding on all via court
Filing stigma; customer/supplier disruption risk
Complex capital structure but deal achievable pre-filing
Chapter 11 / Administration
Court-supervised restructuring with automatic stay
Binds all creditors; DIP financing available; contract rejection
Expensive; slow; management may lose control; value destruction
Hostile creditors; complex multi-party negotiation; need for automatic stay
363 Sale
Asset sale under bankruptcy court supervision
Clean break; highest value to secured creditors
Operating business may lose value in process
Liquidating value > going-concern under current ownership
Liquidation (Chapter 7)
Orderly wind-down and asset disposition
Defined end point
Maximum value destruction; job losses
Going-concern value < liquidation value
Option Scoring
Criterion (weight)
Operational Restructuring
Out-of-Court
Pre-Pack
Chapter 11
363 Sale
Liquidation
Value preservation (25%)
Speed to resolution (20%)
Stakeholder support (20%)
Cost of process (15%)
Business continuity risk (10%)
Management control (10%)
Weighted total
Score each 1-5. Recommend the highest-scoring option with contingency plans.
5. Viability Assessment Framework
Determine if the business is viable as a going concern:
Viability Test
Assessment
Evidence
Core business profitability
Is the core business EBITDA-positive (excluding distress costs)?
Adjusted EBITDA analysis stripping out restructuring charges, non-recurring items
Market position
Does the company have a defensible market position?
Market share, competitive moats, customer switching costs
Cash flow generation
Can the business generate positive operating cash flow post-restructuring?
Projected UFCF under restructured cost base
Capital structure sustainability
Can a restructured balance sheet support the business?
Debt / EBITDA <4x post-restructuring; interest coverage >2x
Management capability
Is the management team capable of executing the turnaround?
Track record, gaps, need for CRO or interim management
Stakeholder support
Will key stakeholders (creditors, customers, employees) support the plan?
Creditor discussions, customer retention indicators, employee sentiment
Conclusion : Viable / Conditionally viable (with specific changes) / Not viable as going concern.
If not viable as a going concern, proceed directly to liquidation analysis.
6. Going-Concern vs. Liquidation Analysis
Asset / Value Component
Going-Concern Value
Orderly Liquidation Value
Forced Liquidation Value
Enterprise value (DCF or multiple-based)
$___M
N/A
N/A
Real estate / facilities
[Included in EV]
$___M (appraised)
$___M (distressed sale)
Equipment and machinery
[Included in EV]
$___M (auction value)
$___M (scrap value)
Inventory
[Included in EV]
$___M (50-80% of book)
$___M (20-40% of book)
Accounts receivable
[Included in EV]
$___M (80-90% of book)
$___M (60-75% of book)
Intellectual property
[Included in EV]
$___M (if separable)
$___M (if any)
Goodwill / workforce
[Included in EV]
$0
$0
Total value
$___M
$___M
$___M
Less: Priority claims (admin, DIP, wages)
($___M)
($___M)
($___M)
Less: Secured claims
($___M)
($___M)
($___M)
Less: Wind-down costs
N/A
($___M)
($___M)
Available for unsecured creditors
$___M
$___M
$___M
Unsecured recovery rate
___%
___%
___%
Decision rule : If going-concern value > orderly liquidation value, restructuring is justified. Present this analysis to creditors to build support for the restructuring plan.
7. Creditor Negotiation Strategy
Negotiation Element
Strategy
Rationale
Forbearance agreement
Request [X]-month standstill on enforcement while plan is developed
Buys time; prevents value-destructive acceleration
DIP / new money
Seek $[X]M DIP facility from [existing lenders / new source]
Fund operations during restructuring; priming lien if in Chapter 11
Amend and extend
Extend maturities by [X] years; reduce amortization
Matches debt service to cash flow capacity
Covenant relief
Waive [specific covenants] for [X] quarters; reset at [new levels]
Avoids technical default while business stabilizes
Debt-for-equity swap
Convert $[X]M of [tranche] to equity at [X]% ownership
Reduces leverage; aligns creditors with recovery
Haircut / write-down
Reduce principal by [X]% on [tranche]
Only when liquidation analysis proves impairment
Interest reduction
Reduce cash interest; PIK toggle for [X] quarters
Preserves cash for operations
Asset sales
Sell non-core assets to repay $[X]M of secured debt
Reduces debt; demonstrates good faith
Key principle : The restructuring plan must leave every creditor class at least as well off as in liquidation (the "best interests" test in Chapter 11).
8. Operational Improvement Quick-Wins
Immediate actions to stabilize and improve cash flow:
30-Day Quick-Wins (Emergency Cash Preservation)
Action
Expected Cash Impact ($M)
Implementation Effort
Owner
Freeze all discretionary spending
$___M saved
Low
CFO
Halt non-critical CapEx
$___M saved
Low
COO
Accelerate AR collections (call past-dues, offer discounts for early payment)
$___M accelerated
Medium
Treasury
Extend AP (negotiate 30-day extensions with non-critical suppliers)
$___M deferred
Medium
Procurement
Reduce inventory (halt new orders, liquidate excess)
$___M freed
Medium
Supply Chain
Implement weekly cash reporting (13-week model)
Visibility
Low
CFO
Renegotiate or terminate non-essential contracts
$___M saved
Medium
Legal
60-Day Quick-Wins (Cost Structure)
Action
Expected Annual Savings ($M)
Implementation Effort
Owner
Headcount reduction (eliminate redundant roles, contractors first)
$___M
High
CHRO
Facility consolidation (close underutilized sites)
$___M
Medium
COO
Procurement renegotiation (top 10 vendors by spend)
$___M
Medium
Procurement
Pricing review (eliminate unprofitable products/customers)
$___M (margin improvement)
Medium
Sales/Finance
SG&A rationalization (travel, marketing, subscriptions)
$___M
Low
All
90-Day Quick-Wins (Revenue and Margin)
Action
Expected Revenue/Margin Impact ($M)
Implementation Effort
Owner
Customer profitability analysis (exit unprofitable accounts)
$___M margin improvement
Medium
Sales/Finance
Pricing increases on inelastic products/services
$___M revenue uplift
Medium
Sales
Sales force effectiveness (reallocate to highest-value accounts)
$___M pipeline improvement
Medium
Sales
Working capital optimization (DSO/DPO/DIO targets)
$___M cash flow improvement
Medium
Treasury
Supply chain optimization (supplier consolidation, logistics)
$___M cost reduction
High
Supply Chain
9. Restructuring Plan Summary Framework
The final restructuring plan must address:
Plan Component
Content
Status
Business plan
3-5 year projections under restructured operations
Capital structure
Pro forma balance sheet post-restructuring; target leverage ratios
Stakeholder treatment
Recovery waterfall for each creditor class and equity
Operational changes
Cost reductions, revenue initiatives, management changes
Liquidity
Sources and uses of cash through restructuring; DIP or new money terms
Implementation timeline
Key milestones from plan approval through emergence
Governance
Board composition, management team, reporting requirements
Monitoring
KPIs, covenant package, reporting cadence to creditors
Output Template
## Restructuring Assessment: [Company Name]
**Date**: [Date] | **Urgency**: [Green/Amber/Red] | **Cash Runway**: [X] weeks
### Situation Overview
[Nature of distress, key triggers, immediate risks]
### Triage Assessment
| Indicator | Status | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Cash runway | [Status] | [1/2/3] |
| Debt maturity | [Status] | [1/2/3] |
| ... | | |
| **Total** | | **[X]/24** |
### 13-Week Cash Flow Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Opening cash | $[X]M |
| Total 13-week receipts | $[X]M |
| Total 13-week disbursements | ($[X]M) |
| Liquidity trough (week [X]) | $[X]M |
| Closing cash (week 13) | $[X]M |
| Stress case trough | $[X]M |
### Capital Structure and Stakeholder Map
| Stakeholder | Claim ($M) | Priority | Posture | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | | | | |
### Fulcrum Security
[Waterfall analysis identifying the fulcrum security]
### Viability Assessment
[Assessment of each viability criterion with conclusion]
### Going-Concern vs. Liquidation
| Scenario | Total Value ($M) | Unsecured Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| Going concern | $[X]M | [X]% |
| Orderly liquidation | $[X]M | [X]% |
| Forced liquidation | $[X]M | [X]% |
### Recommended Restructuring Path
[Selected option with rationale and scoring]
### Creditor Strategy
[Negotiation approach for each creditor class]
### Operational Quick-Wins
#### 30-Day (Cash Preservation)
[Actions with expected cash impact]
#### 60-Day (Cost Structure)
[Actions with expected savings]
#### 90-Day (Revenue and Margin)
[Actions with expected impact]
### Restructuring Plan Outline
[High-level plan components with timeline]
### Key Risks
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| ... | | |
Quality Checks
Triage assessment completed with scoring across all 8 indicators to classify severity (Stressed / Distressed / Critical).
13-week cash flow model built on a receipts-and-disbursements basis with weekly granularity (not monthly).
Liquidity trough identified (the worst week) along with a stress case scenario.
Stakeholder map covers all creditor classes, equity, management, key customers, and key suppliers with claim amounts and priority.
Fulcrum security identified through a waterfall analysis of going-concern value vs. claims.
All restructuring options evaluated (operational, out-of-court, pre-pack, Chapter 11, 363 sale, liquidation) with scoring.
Viability assessment explicitly concludes whether the business is viable as a going concern.
Going-concern value compared to both orderly and forced liquidation values with recovery rates for unsecured creditors.
Creditor negotiation strategy tailored to each creditor class with specific asks (forbearance, amend/extend, haircut, etc.).
Operational quick-wins organized into 30/60/90-day categories with dollar-value estimates and named owners.
Restructuring plan addresses all 8 required components (business plan, capital structure, stakeholder treatment, operational changes, liquidity, timeline, governance, monitoring).
Cross-reference: financial-modeling skill used or referenced for the 13-week cash flow model and business plan projections.
1 --- 2 name: restructuring 3 description: Corporate restructuring and turnaround advisory. USE THIS SKILL when the user asks about restructuring, turnaround, distressed company, 13-week cash flow, liquidity crisis, creditor negotiation, Chapter 11, administration, insolvency, debt restructuring, operational restructuring, covenant breach, going concern, liquidation analysis, viability assessment, creditor committee, DIP financing, forbearance, or quick-win operational improvements. Also trigger when asked about a company running out of cash, defaulting on debt, or needing emergency financial intervention. 4 --- 5 6 # Corporate Restructuring & Turnaround 7 8 ## Required Inputs 9 10 - **Company Overview**: Name, industry, revenue, headcount, and corporate structure. 11 - **Nature of Distress**: Liquidity crisis, overleveraged balance sheet, operational underperformance, or combination. 12 - **Urgency Level**: Weeks of cash remaining (critical if <8 weeks); upcoming debt maturities or covenant test dates. 13 - **Capital Structure**: All debt tranches (senior secured, unsecured, mezzanine, convertibles), equity, and intercompany obligations. 14 - **Key Stakeholders**: Identity of major creditors, equity holders, management team, key customers, and key suppliers. 15 16 ## Execution Steps 17 18 ### 1. Triage Assessment 19 20 Before anything else, determine the severity and time horizon: 21 22 | Indicator | Green (Stable) | Amber (Stressed) | Red (Distressed) | Score | 23 |---|---|---|---|---| 24 | Cash runway | >6 months | 3-6 months | <3 months | | 25 | Debt maturity | >12 months | 6-12 months | <6 months | | 26 | Covenant compliance | In compliance | Waiver needed this quarter | Already in breach | | 27 | EBITDA trend | Growing | Flat or declining <10% | Declining >10% YoY | | 28 | Customer concentration | Top 5 <30% revenue | Top 5 = 30-50% revenue | Top 5 >50% revenue | | 29 | Supplier risk | All stable | 1-2 at risk | Key supplier threatening COD/termination | | 30 | Management capacity | Strong team | Gaps in key roles | CEO/CFO departure or capability gap | | 31 | Stakeholder alignment | Aligned | Some tension | Active creditor conflict | | 32 33 **Scoring**: Green=1, Amber=2, Red=3. Total score 8-12 = Stressed (proactive restructuring). 13-18 = Distressed (urgent restructuring). 19-24 = Critical (immediate intervention, formal proceedings likely). 34 35 ### 2. 13-Week Cash Flow Model 36 37 The 13-week cash flow (TWCF) is the foundational tool for any restructuring. It tracks weekly liquidity on a receipts-and-disbursements basis. 38 39 #### Model Structure 40 41 | Line Item | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | ... | Week 13 | Total | 42 |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| 43 | **Opening cash balance** | | | | | | | 44 | **Receipts** | | | | | | | 45 | Customer collections | | | | | | | 46 | Other receipts | | | | | | | 47 | **Total receipts** | | | | | | | 48 | **Disbursements** | | | | | | | 49 | Payroll and benefits | | | | | | | 50 | Rent and occupancy | | | | | | | 51 | Raw materials / COGS | | | | | | | 52 | Utilities | | | | | | | 53 | Insurance | | | | | | | 54 | Professional fees | | | | | | | 55 | Tax payments | | | | | | | 56 | Interest payments | | | | | | | 57 | Debt amortization | | | | | | | 58 | CapEx (critical only) | | | | | | | 59 | Other disbursements | | | | | | | 60 | **Total disbursements** | | | | | | | 61 | **Net cash flow** | | | | | | | 62 | **Closing cash balance** | | | | | | | 63 | Revolver availability | | | | | | | 64 | **Total liquidity** | | | | | | | 65 | **Minimum cash threshold** | | | | | | | 66 | **Liquidity surplus / (deficit)** | | | | | | | 67 68 **Critical rules for the 13-week model**: 69 - Cash basis only (when cash moves, not when revenue is recognized). 70 - Weekly granularity (not monthly; weekly matters in distress). 71 - Bottom-up build from AP aging, AR aging, payroll register, and committed payments. 72 - Identify the **liquidity trough** (lowest point) and the week it occurs. 73 - Model a **stress case** (10-20% haircut on collections, acceleration of payables). 74 75 Use the `financial-modeling` skill for detailed projection model construction when extending beyond 13 weeks. 76 77 ### 3. Stakeholder Mapping 78 79 Map every stakeholder by their economic interest and leverage: 80 81 | Stakeholder | Claim ($M) | Priority | Security | Leverage | Current Posture | Strategy | 82 |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| 83 | Senior secured lender(s) | | 1st priority | [Collateral description] | High (can enforce) | [Supportive/Neutral/Hostile] | [Approach] | 84 | Second lien / mezzanine | | 2nd priority | [Collateral description] | Medium | | | 85 | Unsecured creditors | | General unsecured | None | Low individually; high collectively | | | 86 | Bondholders | | Per indenture | Per indenture | Depends on indenture trustee | | | 87 | Trade creditors (key) | | General unsecured | None | Operational leverage (supply disruption) | | | 88 | Pension fund / employees | | Priority per jurisdiction | Statutory | Regulatory and political | | | 89 | Equity holders | | Residual | None | Low in distress; Board control | | | 90 | Management team | | N/A | N/A | Operational knowledge | | | 91 | Key customers | | N/A | N/A | Revenue concentration | | | 92 93 #### Fulcrum Security Analysis 94 95 Identify the fulcrum security (the most senior class of capital that is impaired): 96 97 ``` 98 Enterprise Value (going concern) = $[X]M 99 Less: Senior secured debt = ($[A]M) --> Fully covered? [Y/N] 100 Remaining value for junior claims = $[B]M 101 Less: Second lien / mezzanine = ($[C]M) --> Fully covered? [Y/N] 102 Remaining value for unsecured = $[D]M 103 Less: Unsecured claims = ($[E]M) --> Recovery = [D/E x 100]% 104 Equity value = $[F]M --> (often $0 in distress) 105 ``` 106 107 The fulcrum security holder has the most influence in restructuring negotiations. 108 109 ### 4. Restructuring Options Analysis 110 111 Evaluate each option systematically: 112 113 | Option | Description | Pros | Cons | Best When | 114 |---|---|---|---|---| 115 | **Operational restructuring** | Cost reduction, revenue improvement, working capital optimization | Preserves enterprise; no creditor impairment | Slow; may be insufficient if leverage is the problem | Operational underperformance with manageable debt | 116 | **Out-of-court financial restructuring** | Consensual debt renegotiation (amend & extend, covenant relief, debt-for-equity swap) | Faster; lower cost; less stigma; management retains control | Requires unanimous or supermajority creditor consent; holdout risk | Limited number of creditor groups; alignment achievable | 117 | **Pre-packaged bankruptcy** | Agreement reached pre-filing; Chapter 11 for confirmation only | Speed of out-of-court + binding on all via court | Filing stigma; customer/supplier disruption risk | Complex capital structure but deal achievable pre-filing | 118 | **Chapter 11 / Administration** | Court-supervised restructuring with automatic stay | Binds all creditors; DIP financing available; contract rejection | Expensive; slow; management may lose control; value destruction | Hostile creditors; complex multi-party negotiation; need for automatic stay | 119 | **363 Sale** | Asset sale under bankruptcy court supervision | Clean break; highest value to secured creditors | Operating business may lose value in process | Liquidating value > going-concern under current ownership | 120 | **Liquidation (Chapter 7)** | Orderly wind-down and asset disposition | Defined end point | Maximum value destruction; job losses | Going-concern value < liquidation value | 121 122 #### Option Scoring 123 124 | Criterion (weight) | Operational Restructuring | Out-of-Court | Pre-Pack | Chapter 11 | 363 Sale | Liquidation | 125 |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| 126 | Value preservation (25%) | | | | | | | 127 | Speed to resolution (20%) | | | | | | | 128 | Stakeholder support (20%) | | | | | | | 129 | Cost of process (15%) | | | | | | | 130 | Business continuity risk (10%) | | | | | | | 131 | Management control (10%) | | | | | | | 132 | **Weighted total** | | | | | | | 133 134 Score each 1-5. Recommend the highest-scoring option with contingency plans. 135 136 ### 5. Viability Assessment Framework 137 138 Determine if the business is viable as a going concern: 139 140 | Viability Test | Assessment | Evidence | 141 |---|---|---| 142 | **Core business profitability** | Is the core business EBITDA-positive (excluding distress costs)? | Adjusted EBITDA analysis stripping out restructuring charges, non-recurring items | 143 | **Market position** | Does the company have a defensible market position? | Market share, competitive moats, customer switching costs | 144 | **Cash flow generation** | Can the business generate positive operating cash flow post-restructuring? | Projected UFCF under restructured cost base | 145 | **Capital structure sustainability** | Can a restructured balance sheet support the business? | Debt / EBITDA <4x post-restructuring; interest coverage >2x | 146 | **Management capability** | Is the management team capable of executing the turnaround? | Track record, gaps, need for CRO or interim management | 147 | **Stakeholder support** | Will key stakeholders (creditors, customers, employees) support the plan? | Creditor discussions, customer retention indicators, employee sentiment | 148 149 **Conclusion**: Viable / Conditionally viable (with specific changes) / Not viable as going concern. 150 151 If not viable as a going concern, proceed directly to liquidation analysis. 152 153 ### 6. Going-Concern vs. Liquidation Analysis 154 155 | Asset / Value Component | Going-Concern Value | Orderly Liquidation Value | Forced Liquidation Value | 156 |---|---|---|---| 157 | Enterprise value (DCF or multiple-based) | $___M | N/A | N/A | 158 | Real estate / facilities | [Included in EV] | $___M (appraised) | $___M (distressed sale) | 159 | Equipment and machinery | [Included in EV] | $___M (auction value) | $___M (scrap value) | 160 | Inventory | [Included in EV] | $___M (50-80% of book) | $___M (20-40% of book) | 161 | Accounts receivable | [Included in EV] | $___M (80-90% of book) | $___M (60-75% of book) | 162 | Intellectual property | [Included in EV] | $___M (if separable) | $___M (if any) | 163 | Goodwill / workforce | [Included in EV] | $0 | $0 | 164 | **Total value** | $___M | $___M | $___M | 165 | Less: Priority claims (admin, DIP, wages) | ($___M) | ($___M) | ($___M) | 166 | Less: Secured claims | ($___M) | ($___M) | ($___M) | 167 | Less: Wind-down costs | N/A | ($___M) | ($___M) | 168 | **Available for unsecured creditors** | $___M | $___M | $___M | 169 | **Unsecured recovery rate** | ___% | ___% | ___% | 170 171 **Decision rule**: If going-concern value > orderly liquidation value, restructuring is justified. Present this analysis to creditors to build support for the restructuring plan. 172 173 ### 7. Creditor Negotiation Strategy 174 175 | Negotiation Element | Strategy | Rationale | 176 |---|---|---| 177 | **Forbearance agreement** | Request [X]-month standstill on enforcement while plan is developed | Buys time; prevents value-destructive acceleration | 178 | **DIP / new money** | Seek $[X]M DIP facility from [existing lenders / new source] | Fund operations during restructuring; priming lien if in Chapter 11 | 179 | **Amend and extend** | Extend maturities by [X] years; reduce amortization | Matches debt service to cash flow capacity | 180 | **Covenant relief** | Waive [specific covenants] for [X] quarters; reset at [new levels] | Avoids technical default while business stabilizes | 181 | **Debt-for-equity swap** | Convert $[X]M of [tranche] to equity at [X]% ownership | Reduces leverage; aligns creditors with recovery | 182 | **Haircut / write-down** | Reduce principal by [X]% on [tranche] | Only when liquidation analysis proves impairment | 183 | **Interest reduction** | Reduce cash interest; PIK toggle for [X] quarters | Preserves cash for operations | 184 | **Asset sales** | Sell non-core assets to repay $[X]M of secured debt | Reduces debt; demonstrates good faith | 185 186 **Key principle**: The restructuring plan must leave every creditor class at least as well off as in liquidation (the "best interests" test in Chapter 11). 187 188 ### 8. Operational Improvement Quick-Wins 189 190 Immediate actions to stabilize and improve cash flow: 191 192 #### 30-Day Quick-Wins (Emergency Cash Preservation) 193 194 | Action | Expected Cash Impact ($M) | Implementation Effort | Owner | 195 |---|---|---|---| 196 | Freeze all discretionary spending | $___M saved | Low | CFO | 197 | Halt non-critical CapEx | $___M saved | Low | COO | 198 | Accelerate AR collections (call past-dues, offer discounts for early payment) | $___M accelerated | Medium | Treasury | 199 | Extend AP (negotiate 30-day extensions with non-critical suppliers) | $___M deferred | Medium | Procurement | 200 | Reduce inventory (halt new orders, liquidate excess) | $___M freed | Medium | Supply Chain | 201 | Implement weekly cash reporting (13-week model) | Visibility | Low | CFO | 202 | Renegotiate or terminate non-essential contracts | $___M saved | Medium | Legal | 203 204 #### 60-Day Quick-Wins (Cost Structure) 205 206 | Action | Expected Annual Savings ($M) | Implementation Effort | Owner | 207 |---|---|---|---| 208 | Headcount reduction (eliminate redundant roles, contractors first) | $___M | High | CHRO | 209 | Facility consolidation (close underutilized sites) | $___M | Medium | COO | 210 | Procurement renegotiation (top 10 vendors by spend) | $___M | Medium | Procurement | 211 | Pricing review (eliminate unprofitable products/customers) | $___M (margin improvement) | Medium | Sales/Finance | 212 | SG&A rationalization (travel, marketing, subscriptions) | $___M | Low | All | 213 214 #### 90-Day Quick-Wins (Revenue and Margin) 215 216 | Action | Expected Revenue/Margin Impact ($M) | Implementation Effort | Owner | 217 |---|---|---|---| 218 | Customer profitability analysis (exit unprofitable accounts) | $___M margin improvement | Medium | Sales/Finance | 219 | Pricing increases on inelastic products/services | $___M revenue uplift | Medium | Sales | 220 | Sales force effectiveness (reallocate to highest-value accounts) | $___M pipeline improvement | Medium | Sales | 221 | Working capital optimization (DSO/DPO/DIO targets) | $___M cash flow improvement | Medium | Treasury | 222 | Supply chain optimization (supplier consolidation, logistics) | $___M cost reduction | High | Supply Chain | 223 224 ### 9. Restructuring Plan Summary Framework 225 226 The final restructuring plan must address: 227 228 | Plan Component | Content | Status | 229 |---|---|---| 230 | **Business plan** | 3-5 year projections under restructured operations | | 231 | **Capital structure** | Pro forma balance sheet post-restructuring; target leverage ratios | | 232 | **Stakeholder treatment** | Recovery waterfall for each creditor class and equity | | 233 | **Operational changes** | Cost reductions, revenue initiatives, management changes | | 234 | **Liquidity** | Sources and uses of cash through restructuring; DIP or new money terms | | 235 | **Implementation timeline** | Key milestones from plan approval through emergence | | 236 | **Governance** | Board composition, management team, reporting requirements | | 237 | **Monitoring** | KPIs, covenant package, reporting cadence to creditors | | 238 239 ## Output Template 240 241 ```markdown 242 ## Restructuring Assessment: [Company Name] 243 244 **Date**: [Date] | **Urgency**: [Green/Amber/Red] | **Cash Runway**: [X] weeks 245 246 ### Situation Overview 247 [Nature of distress, key triggers, immediate risks] 248 249 ### Triage Assessment 250 | Indicator | Status | Score | 251 |---|---|---| 252 | Cash runway | [Status] | [1/2/3] | 253 | Debt maturity | [Status] | [1/2/3] | 254 | ... | | | 255 | **Total** | | **[X]/24** | 256 257 ### 13-Week Cash Flow Summary 258 | Metric | Value | 259 |---|---| 260 | Opening cash | $[X]M | 261 | Total 13-week receipts | $[X]M | 262 | Total 13-week disbursements | ($[X]M) | 263 | Liquidity trough (week [X]) | $[X]M | 264 | Closing cash (week 13) | $[X]M | 265 | Stress case trough | $[X]M | 266 267 ### Capital Structure and Stakeholder Map 268 | Stakeholder | Claim ($M) | Priority | Posture | Strategy | 269 |---|---|---|---|---| 270 | ... | | | | | 271 272 ### Fulcrum Security 273 [Waterfall analysis identifying the fulcrum security] 274 275 ### Viability Assessment 276 [Assessment of each viability criterion with conclusion] 277 278 ### Going-Concern vs. Liquidation 279 | Scenario | Total Value ($M) | Unsecured Recovery | 280 |---|---|---| 281 | Going concern | $[X]M | [X]% | 282 | Orderly liquidation | $[X]M | [X]% | 283 | Forced liquidation | $[X]M | [X]% | 284 285 ### Recommended Restructuring Path 286 [Selected option with rationale and scoring] 287 288 ### Creditor Strategy 289 [Negotiation approach for each creditor class] 290 291 ### Operational Quick-Wins 292 #### 30-Day (Cash Preservation) 293 [Actions with expected cash impact] 294 295 #### 60-Day (Cost Structure) 296 [Actions with expected savings] 297 298 #### 90-Day (Revenue and Margin) 299 [Actions with expected impact] 300 301 ### Restructuring Plan Outline 302 [High-level plan components with timeline] 303 304 ### Key Risks 305 | Risk | Impact | Mitigation | 306 |---|---|---| 307 | ... | | | 308 ``` 309 310 ## Quality Checks 311 312 - [ ] Triage assessment completed with scoring across all 8 indicators to classify severity (Stressed / Distressed / Critical). 313 - [ ] 13-week cash flow model built on a receipts-and-disbursements basis with weekly granularity (not monthly). 314 - [ ] Liquidity trough identified (the worst week) along with a stress case scenario. 315 - [ ] Stakeholder map covers all creditor classes, equity, management, key customers, and key suppliers with claim amounts and priority. 316 - [ ] Fulcrum security identified through a waterfall analysis of going-concern value vs. claims. 317 - [ ] All restructuring options evaluated (operational, out-of-court, pre-pack, Chapter 11, 363 sale, liquidation) with scoring. 318 - [ ] Viability assessment explicitly concludes whether the business is viable as a going concern. 319 - [ ] Going-concern value compared to both orderly and forced liquidation values with recovery rates for unsecured creditors. 320 - [ ] Creditor negotiation strategy tailored to each creditor class with specific asks (forbearance, amend/extend, haircut, etc.). 321 - [ ] Operational quick-wins organized into 30/60/90-day categories with dollar-value estimates and named owners. 322 - [ ] Restructuring plan addresses all 8 required components (business plan, capital structure, stakeholder treatment, operational changes, liquidity, timeline, governance, monitoring). 323 - [ ] Cross-reference: `financial-modeling` skill used or referenced for the 13-week cash flow model and business plan projections.