Technical Debt Audit Runner
Advanced operational skill for technical-debt-audit-runner.
## Activation trigger
Use this skill when the user requests **technical debt audit runner** and needs a high-confidence, decision-ready outcome in **mvp-build**.
## Required inputs
- Audit target (repo/module/system) and risk appetite.
Severity model (P0-P3) and remediation SLA expectations.
Security or quality policies that must be enforced.
Evidence sources (code, configs, logs, prior incidents).
Optional inputs
- Previous outputs from this skill family.
- Team ownership map and delivery timeline.
- Explicit constraints for cost, risk, or compliance.
Files to inspect
concept/,templates/,examples/,scripts/in this skill folder.- User-referenced repository files and related modules.
- Prior artifacts that constrain or inform this decision.
Execution workflow
- Inspect the target and collect objective evidence per risk domain.
Classify findings by impact, exploitability/probability, and blast radius.
Produce remediation plan with sequencing, owners, and verification steps.
Flag quick wins vs structural fixes and quantify residual risk.
Deliver a release recommendation (blocker/warn/pass) with rationale.
Generated artifacts
outputs/audit-report.md
outputs/remediation-plan.mdoutputs/retest-checklist.mdOutput contract
Final response must include:
- Objective and scope boundaries.
- Inputs and assumptions used.
- Analysis and decision rationale.
- Artifact paths and summary.
- Validation result and residual risks.
- Next actions ordered by priority.
Validation checklist
- Required sections are complete and non-empty.
No placeholder content (
TODO,TBD,lorem,placeholder).Claims are traceable to provided inputs or inspected files.
Output includes explicit decisions, risks, and next steps.
Safety / failure rules
- Pause and ask for clarification if required inputs are missing or contradictory.
Do not invent metrics, user evidence, or repository facts.
Do not modify unrelated files or broaden scope silently.
If high-risk uncertainty remains, return a gated recommendation instead of false precision.
Example commands
$technical-debt-audit-runner "Run technical debt audit runner on my current project context" python scripts/run.py --input examples/input-example.md python scripts/validate.py --file examples/output-example.mdAdvanced usage
- Run in phased mode: discovery -> draft -> validation -> final.
- Compare two decision branches and include tradeoff table.
- Enforce stricter gates for production/release-critical use.