Release Analyze

Katalon Release Analyze

Use this skill to assess release readiness from Katalon MCP data. The output must be a testing-quality decision, not just a metric dump.

Availability Boundary

State the MCP boundary before promising an assessment:

• Available through Katalon MCP: project/repository discovery, requirements, test cases, test suites, executions/results, quality summaries, defect data, stability data, and configuration coverage when tools are exposed.
• Not directly available: create formal Test Plan entities, inspect live AUT UI, guarantee AI execution completion, or decide product/business readiness beyond test evidence.
• If MCP tools are unavailable, provide only a framework/template and mark release confidence as Low until data is verified.

Read references/capability-boundaries.md when capability scope is unclear.

Required Scope

Resolve or ask for the minimum missing scope:

• Katalon project and repository/Test Project.
• Release identifier, sprint, iteration, version, test suite, suite collection, execution ID, or date range.
• Target environment/configuration matrix when readiness depends on browsers, devices, OS, or deployment environments.
• Quality gate thresholds when the team has defined them.

If the user gives only a release name or issue key, use MCP discovery first. Ask only when multiple equally plausible scopes remain.

MCP Data Collection

Always resolve context before analysis:

1. Call list_projects.
2. Call list_repositories.
3. Resolve the repository/Test Project.
4. Find the release scope using available requirement, suite, execution, iteration, or result tools.

Collect evidence with the available Katalon MCP tools:

• Requirement and traceability: find_requirements, read_requirement, fetch_requirement_data.
• Test case quality: find_test_cases, find_test_cases_by_requirement, fetch_test_case_data.
• Suites and executable scope: find_test_suites, read_test_suite.
• Executions and results: read_execution, read_execution_test_results, read_test_result, find_test_results.
• Defect risk: fetch_defect_data.
• Stability: fetch_test_stability_data.
• Configuration coverage: fetch_test_configuration_data.

Use the freshest data available for the requested release. If comparing trend or stability, include the date range used.

Key Metrics

Report the metrics that are available and relevant:

• Requirement coverage: total, covered, uncovered, linked test cases, requirements without passing evidence.
• Test coverage: total tests, automated/manual split, unexecuted, blocked, stale, missing ownership or incomplete cases.
• Execution health: latest executions, pass/fail/blocked/skipped/not-run counts, pass rate, failed P0/P1 tests.
• Defect risk: open critical/high defects, release blockers, reopened defects, failed tests with linked defects, untriaged failures.
• Stability: flaky tests, repeated failures, unstable suites/configurations, recent trend.
• Configuration coverage: environments, browsers, devices, OS, execution profiles, and missing target combinations.
• Data confidence: missing MCP data, stale executions, ambiguous release scope, or incomplete links.

Read references/release-quality-gates.md before making the final readiness decision.

Readiness Decision

Return one of:

• Ready: no testing blocker remains; critical requirements have coverage and recent passing evidence; target configurations are sufficiently tested.
• Ready with risk: no hard blocker remains, but moderate gaps or accepted risks exist.
• Not ready: release-blocking defects, failed/blocked/unrun critical tests, missing critical coverage, stale evidence, or untested required configurations remain.

If thresholds are provided, apply them. If not, use risk-based judgment and state assumptions.

Never mark Ready when:

• Critical/high release-blocking defects remain open.
• P0/P1 tests are failed, blocked, or not run without accepted risk.
• Critical requirements have no tests or no passing evidence.
• Required target configurations are untested.
• MCP data is unavailable or too incomplete to support confidence.

Response Format

Respond with:

Release Readiness: Ready | Ready with risk | Not ready
Confidence: High | Medium | Low

Key Metrics:
- Requirement coverage:
- Test execution:
- Defect risk:
- Stability:
- Configuration coverage:

Blocking Issues:
- ...

Risks / Gaps:
- ...

Recommendation:
- ...

Evidence:
- ...

Evidence should include execution IDs, suite names, requirement keys, defect IDs, or links when returned by the platform.

Follow-Up Actions

Recommend concrete next steps:

• Create or link missing tests for uncovered critical requirements.
• Re-run failed, flaky, or stale suites.
• Resolve or accept specific defects.
• Expand configuration coverage for missing release targets.
• Use execute-test when execution is needed.
• Use create-test-cases when coverage gaps require new manual cases.
• Use upload-report when external automation results must be uploaded before assessment.