Investment Decision

Investment decision workflow

Use this workflow inside the current agent runtime. Do not launch another agent or model through clawock: the current runtime owns research, conversation, memory, skills, tools, repair loops, and permissions.

Run

1. Run clawock run prepare --workspace <workspace> and retain the printed request_file, run_id, generation_id, workflow version, and certified context.

2. Research with the current runtime's normal tools. Collect traceable evidence observed no later than the decision's as_of time.

3. Write decision.json using the decision contract and its linked JSON Schema. Include at least one supporting and one opposing evidence item. The bull and bear cases must cite their evidence rather than merely asserting conclusions.

4. State thesis invalidation conditions before choosing an action. A high confidence decision must cite primary evidence.

5. If the action contains an order intent, calculate quote-currency gross amount as quantity times unit price, then calculate base-currency gross amount using the stated FX rate. Do not estimate either total in prose.

6. Publish with:

   clawock run publish --workspace <workspace> --request <request_file> --artifact decision.json=<workspace>/decision.json

7. If publication is rejected, repair only the named artifact issues and retry against the same prepared request. Re-run prepare if its context or workflow certificate changed.

The final receipt is the proof that one workflow version, certified context, and artifact generation passed the deterministic gates. It is supporting evidence, not a substitute for the decision itself.

Learn from outcomes

After the stated horizon, record broker, exchange, or market-data evidence using assets/outcome.example.json, then run clawock workflow evaluate. The result reconciles price and FX before assigning a direction-adjusted basis-point score; it is not realized portfolio P&L.

A runtime may use that evaluation or a rejected validation receipt to request a bounded parameter proposal with clawock workflow propose. The proposal cannot apply itself. A named reviewer must explicitly accept or reject the exact hash, and accepted changes go through workflow apply; workflow rollback restores the recorded prior parameters. See the decision contract for commands and the strict no-self-edit boundary.