kehwar Dev Log
Write a focused development log entry and save it to docs/development-log/.
Quick start
User: "Write a dev log for what we just did"
User: "Log this implementation decision"
User: "Write a dev log for phase 2 completion"
Workflow
1. Determine scope and topic
If the user did not specify, infer from context:
| Context clue | What to do |
|---|---|
| "current session" | Summarise all significant decisions/events from the conversation |
| "current changes" / staged files | Inspect git diff --staged or git status |
| "last N commits" | Run git log -N --oneline then read the diffs |
| "plan phase" | Read the plan file; summarise what was built and why |
| "PRD/plan completed" | High-level retrospective of the full feature |
| Specific topic stated by user | Use that topic directly |
2. Interview until shared understanding
Before writing, confirm with the user:
- What is the core topic? One sentence. If you can't say it in one sentence, it may be too broad.
- What should be included vs omitted? Surface ambiguous areas and let the user decide.
The audience is always the author's future self — write to answer "why did we do this?" not to explain basics.
Keep iterating until both you and the user agree on what the entry covers.
Breadth check: If the draft outline covers more than ~3 distinct decisions or events, flag it:
"This is shaping up to cover [X, Y, Z]. Would you prefer one broad entry, or split into separate entries per topic?"
Respect the user's answer — do not force a split.
3. Gather evidence
Collect the raw material before writing:
- Read relevant files, diffs, or plan phases
- Note: decisions made and the alternatives that were rejected, bugs found and root causes, non-obvious constraints or discoveries, file/module paths that are central to the topic
4. Generate slug
Derive a short kebab-case slug from the topic (3–6 words max).
Examples: composite-key-routing, phase-3-job-complete, vat-rounding-bug.
5. Write the file
Path: docs/development-log/YYYY_MM_DD_<slug>.md
Use today's date. Create the directory if it doesn't exist.
Use the template below — keep sections that are relevant, omit the rest.
Entry template
---
date: YYYY-MM-DD
---
# <Title>
## Problem Statement
<Why this entry exists. What problem, situation, or question prompted it — from the developer's perspective. 2–4 sentences.>
## Solution
<What was built, fixed, or decided. Be specific. Include code snippets, config values, or file paths where useful.>
## Implementation Decisions
<A list of the key technical choices made. For each decision, include what was chosen and why. Cover:>
- Modules built or modified and their interfaces
- Architectural choices
- Schema or API changes
- Non-obvious constraints or discoveries
## Alternatives Considered
<Alternatives that were evaluated and rejected, and the reason each was ruled out.>
## Further Notes
<Result: what now works, what changed, what future work this enables or constrains, and any loose ends or follow-up observations.>
Tips
- Prefer specificity. A narrow, focused entry ages better than a broad one — but broad entries are valid when the user wants a high-level summary.
- One topic per entry is the default. If a session covered distinct decisions, offer to split.
- Be specific. Vague entries ("we refactored the sync job") are worthless in 6 months. Name files, fields, and values.
- Don't over-document. Skip obvious choices. Only record things that would be non-obvious to a future reader (including yourself).