Workflow Fix And Ship

workflow-fix-and-ship — Bug Fix Lifecycle

Degree of freedom: MIXED. Root-cause and surgical fix [HIGH freedom]; reproduce-before-edit, regression test, and PR evidence [LOW freedom — run exactly].

Triage → fix → verify → ship. Every step leaves evidence.

How to reason

1. Reproduce — exact local steps before any edit
2. Isolate — one-sentence root cause, not the crash site
3. Fix — smallest change plus a test that would have caught it
4. Prove — same repro is green; nearby flows still work

Worked example

Reproduce: checkout 500s when the cart has a deleted SKU; Sentry shows TypeError in quoteCart. Isolate: quoteCart assumes every line item still exists; deleted SKU yields undefined price. Fix: treat missing SKU as an invalid line + regression test with a deleted product id. Prove: Playwright retries the deleted-SKU cart → inline error, not 500; pay-happy-path still completes.

Self-critique before reporting

• Reproduced first — steps were stated before the first edit
• Root named — "X because Y", not "it was broken"
• Regression test — a test that fails on the old code exists
• Right owner — many reports → workflow-feedback-to-closure; FE↔BE contract → debug-fe-be-integration

Phase sequence [LOW freedom — run exactly]

1. TRIAGE     → pull Sentry + logs, reproduce locally
2. ROOT CAUSE → debug-error (isolate, identify, understand)
3. FIX        → surgical change, matching tests
4. VERIFY     → test-playwright (confirm fix, catch regressions)
5. PR         → workflow-pr
6. POST-SHIP  → deploy-verify (optional if deploy is immediate)

Phase 1: Triage [HIGH freedom]

Pull signals before touching code:

sentry:search_issues
{
  "organizationSlug": "<ORG>",
  "query": "<describe the bug>",
  "projectSlugOrId": "<PROJECT>",
  "regionUrl": "<REGION_URL>",
  "limit": 5
}

Then pull Supabase logs if the bug may be data-related:

supabase:get_logs
{
  "project_id": "<PROJECT_ID>",
  "service": "api"
}

Reproduce locally before any code change. State the exact repro steps.

Phase 2: Root cause (read debug-error) [HIGH freedom]

Read the debug-error skill and follow it.

Required output: one-sentence root cause statement — "The bug is X because Y."

Phase 3: Fix [HIGH freedom]

Rules:

• Surgical change only — do not refactor unrelated code
• Add a regression test that would have caught this bug
• If the fix requires a schema change, apply via Supabase MCP and write the migration file

Phase 4: Verify (read test-playwright) [LOW freedom — hand off]

Read the test-playwright skill and follow it.

Drive the live app through the exact repro scenario. Confirm the fix resolves it. Check that nearby flows still work (regression scope = files touched ± 1 level).

Phase 5: PR (read workflow-pr) [LOW freedom — hand off]

Read the workflow-pr skill and follow it.

PR description must include:

• Root cause (one sentence)
• Sentry issue link or repro steps
• Screenshot/recording showing the fix working

Phase 6: Post-deploy smoke (optional — read deploy-verify) [LOW freedom — hand off]

If deploying immediately after merge, read the deploy-verify skill.

Resolve the Sentry issue after confirming the fix is live in production.

Done criteria [LOW freedom — do not skip]

• Reproduced locally with exact steps
• Root cause identified (not just "it was broken")
• Regression test added
• Smoke test confirms fix and no new breakage
• PR open with root cause + evidence
• Sentry issue resolved (after deploy confirmation)