Obsidian Process Pages

obsidian-process-pages

Replicate the manual cleanup workflow for the vault's pages/ archive (old, flat, unsorted notes) so an agent can process them in batches instead of one at a time by hand. Processes notes alphabetically from the top of pages/, in full, one at a time.

Run this skill from the vault root (the Obsidian Zettelkasten vault directory). All paths below are relative to that root. Never read, write, or move anything outside it.

Argument parsing

Arguments: <N> [--dry-run] [--enrich]

• N (optional, default 20): how many notes to process this batch.
• --dry-run: run detection + plan the transform and destination for each note, print the full report, but make no edits and no moves. Recommend this for a user's first run.
• --enrich (optional, default off): when a referenced Person/Book/etc. note already exists but is malformed, fix it via the obsidian-vault-add skill (keeping any info already present in it). Never creates a new note for something that doesn't exist yet — that's out of scope even with --enrich. Leave this off unless the user explicitly asks.

Examples: Process 20 notes, Process 50 pages --dry-run, Process 10 notes --enrich.

If the user just says "process notes" with no number, use N=20 and tell them you did.

Batch selection

1. List pages/*.md and sort alphabetically — this mirrors what the user sees at the top of Obsidian's file explorer.

   ls "pages/" | grep '\.md$' | sort
   

2. Skip any file that already has a ❓ tag (35+ notes are pre-tagged from earlier manual triage; more accumulate as this skill runs):

   grep -q "❓" "pages/<name>.md" && echo SKIP
   

3. Take the first N survivors. This is the batch.

There is no separate progress/state file — progress is implicit in the filesystem: processed notes leave pages/ (moved to their destination folder), and ❓-tagged notes stay behind but are always skipped on future runs. Re-running the skill is always safe.

Per-note workflow

Process one note fully before starting the next. For each file in the batch:

1. Read

Read the full note (frontmatter + body).

2. Detect type

Default assumption: Note or Quote — these cover nearly the whole backlog. Full heuristics (including the rarer resource types and the MOC/index trap) are in references/type-detection.md — read it before classifying if the note isn't an obvious plain Note.

Quick rule of thumb: title is Author - Statement..., OR the note has the Zitat tag, OR the body's point is a > blockquote of someone else's words → Quote. Otherwise → Note. A callout (> [!SUMMARY]) or an illustrative dialogue blockquote does not make a note a Quote.

If you cannot confidently classify → go to Ambiguity handling below (skip this note, continue the batch).

3. Parse and remove footnotes

If the note has [^id] markers and a matching [^id]: [[Author]] (YYYY): _Title_, <url>. definition line, extract structured data from it and delete both the marker and the definition. Full parsing rules, multi-author splitting, and the published-date rule are in references/footnote-parsing.md — read it whenever a note has a footnote to parse.

If a note has no footnote at all, skip this step and continue — that's the normal case for plain evergreen notes.

If a [^id]: line doesn't match the expected pattern well enough to extract cleanly, don't guess — treat this note as ambiguous (❓ + skip).

3b. Quote attribution line (independent of footnotes)

For every note classified type: Quote, authors must end up populated — this holds whether or not the note has a footnote. Most quotes carry their real citation in the attribution line right under the blockquote, not in a footnote:

> Facts don’t care about your feelings.
>
> [[Ben Shapiro]]

> Jefferson's principle...
>
> [[Bret Weinstein]], [DarkHorse Podcast: Cave of Mirrors...](url), 16. Jul 2024

Parse that line every time, independent of whether a footnote also exists:

• The [[Wikilink]] name(s) right after the blockquote → authors. Multiple names joined by and/und/, → split, same rule as footnote multi-author splitting.
• A podcast/article/book title after the author (plain text or [Text](url)) → sources.
• A trailing date (16. Jul 2024, 12. Jul 2023) → published (full YYYY-MM-DD only) and year.
• A verse/chapter/timestamp (Verse 316, 6.2.35b, [52:00]) → position.
• A bare URL in the attribution line (not already in urls) → append to urls.

Never let a footnote's byline silently stand in for authors on a Quote. A footnote often cites the reporter (a video creator, journalist, podcast host) who is not the person being quoted — e.g. a Mussolini quote sourced via an "Academy of Ideas" YouTube essay has footnote author [[Academy of Ideas]], but the actual speaker in the attribution line is [[Benito Mussolini]]. authors on a Quote note means "who said/wrote these words," which is the name in the attribution line, not necessarily the footnote's byline. When both exist and agree, no conflict. When they disagree, the attribution line wins for authors; the footnote's byline/source still legitimately fills sources/urls/reference (it's still where you found the quote). If a Quote genuinely has no named speaker (an anonymous quote, an organization's own public statement), it's fine for authors to be the reporter/reporting org instead — that's not a violation of this rule, just the note's only available author.

Before finishing a Quote note, re-check: is authors non-empty? If not, look again at the blockquote's attribution line — it's very rarely actually missing.

4. Rebuild frontmatter

Using the type resolved in step 2, rebuild the frontmatter in the exact field order of that type's template (references/templates.md has every type's field order and destination folder). Rules:

• Preserve created exactly as it currently appears (don't reformat date-only vs datetime).
• Set updated to the current datetime (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM) — every processed note gets a fresh updated, even if it already had one.
• Keep existing aliases, tags, related, urls values; merge in anything newly extracted from footnotes (don't discard existing entries).
• Keep the type's mandated tag if the template specifies one (e.g. Quote → Zitat, Book → Buch). If reclassifying a Zitat-tagged Note into type: Quote, keep the Zitat tag and switch to the Quote field order.
• Map footnote-extracted data per references/footnote-parsing.md: authors as [[Wikilink]] list, sources as a plain string (never wikilinked), year, publication as [[Wikilink]] (Quote/Literature Note only, best-effort), published only with a full YYYY-MM-DD, urls list, reference list of footnote ids.
• Drop any frontmatter field that isn't part of the target type's template.
• Never write a bare [[Text: With A Colon]] wikilink — a colon inside double brackets is invalid syntax and prettier will silently mangle it (drops everything after the colon). See "Wikilinks with a colon in the display text" in references/templates.md for the fix (alias syntax if the note exists, italic plain text if it doesn't).

5. Format with prettier

prettier --write "pages/<name>.md"

Run this while the file is still in pages/, after editing, before moving. No flags needed — the vault's root .prettierrc.json is auto-discovered and its markdown override applies (tabs, tabWidth 2, double quotes, printWidth 100, LF, trailing newline). If prettier isn't on PATH, this is a batch-level precondition failure — stop and tell the user rather than guessing an install location.

6. Move to destination

Look up the destination folder for the resolved type in references/templates.md. Check for a name collision before moving — never overwrite:

test -e "<destination-folder>/<name>.md" && echo COLLISION

• If a collision exists: this is a possible duplicate. Add ❓ to the pages/ note's tags, leave it in pages/ untouched otherwise, log it as skipped, and move on.
• Otherwise:

  mv "pages/<name>.md" "<destination-folder>/<name>.md"
  

  A plain mv is safe — the vault uses shortest-path wikilinks, so any inbound [[Title]] links elsewhere in the vault keep resolving after the move.

Skip this entire step under --dry-run — just record the planned destination.

7. --enrich (optional, only if the user passed this flag)

If an authors/related wikilink points to an existing Person (or other resource) note that is missing expected fields or otherwise malformed, invoke the obsidian-vault-add skill to fill it in, explicitly preserving whatever information is already in that note. Do not create notes for wikilinks that don't resolve to anything yet — leave those as ordinary (red) links.

8. QA pass before reporting

Before writing the end-of-batch report, spot-check the batch's own output, not just the plan:

• Every moved type: Quote file has a non-empty authors field (see step 3b). An empty authors on a Quote is a processing bug, not an acceptable outcome — go back and fix it rather than reporting the batch done.
• No [[...]] in any touched file contains a bare colon (see the wikilink-colon rule in references/templates.md).

This check is cheap (grep for authors:\n( - .*\n)* immediately followed by a non-list field, or for \[\[[^\]|]*:[^\]|]*\]\]) and catches the two most common silent failure modes of this skill.

Ambiguity handling: ❓ and continue

Never pause the batch to ask about an individual note — that defeats the point of batch processing. When a note can't be safely and confidently processed:

1. Add ❓ to its tags list (append, don't replace existing tags).
2. Leave the rest of the note untouched — no frontmatter reorder, no move.
3. Record it (with a short reason) for the end-of-batch report.
4. Continue to the next note.

Mark ❓ when: type can't be confidently determined; a footnote doesn't match the expected pattern closely enough to extract cleanly; the destination already has a same-named file (collision); author/source can't be cleanly separated from the footnote; the note is an index/MOC/link-hub rather than real content (see references/type-detection.md).

Do not mark ❓ just because a note is missing optional data — publication, position, or published date being absent is normal; proceed anyway. A note that's already well-formed (right type, right field order, no footnote) still gets prettier-run and moved — reprocessing it is idempotent and expected.

Only interrupt the whole batch to ask the user (not per-note) if a batch-level precondition fails: pages/ is empty, N survivors are fewer than requested (finish with what's available and say so), or the prettier binary is unavailable.

End-of-batch report

After the batch finishes (or after a --dry-run pass), report:

• Selected / processed / ❓-skipped / collision counts.
• Per-type move counts, e.g. Quote → 03 Resources/Zitate/: 6, Note → 04 Permanent/: 12.
• List of moved files: <name>.md → <destination-folder>/.
• List of ❓-skipped files with a one-line reason each.
• How many notes remain in pages/ afterward.
• Confirmation that qmd update was run (skip under --dry-run).

Re-index

After a live (non-dry-run) batch completes, re-index so moved/edited notes are searchable:

qmd update

Run qmd embed too if the user's setup requires it for semantic search; if it's slow, run it run_in_background: true.

Error handling

• Any single-note failure (unexpected parse error, unreadable file) → treat as ambiguous: ❓-tag it if possible, log it, and continue with the rest of the batch. Never abort the whole batch over one bad note.
• Never write, move, or delete anything outside the vault root.
• Never run git commands in the vault — Obsidian Git auto-commits on its own schedule; don't fight it.
• Never overwrite an existing file at a destination path — always ❓-skip on collision.