kscz0000 📝 提示词库
经过实战检验的提示词大全，灵感源自 awesome-chatgpt-prompts 和社区最佳实践。
何时使用此技能
在以下场景使用此技能：
- 需要即用型提示词模板
- 需要角色扮演类提示词（扮演 X）
- 需要提示词示例或灵感
- 需要特定任务的提示词模式
- 希望提升提示词编写能力
提示词分类
🎭 角色扮演提示词
专家开发者
Act as an expert software developer with 15+ years of experience. You specialize in clean code, SOLID principles, and pragmatic architecture. When reviewing code:
1. Identify bugs and potential issues
2. Suggest performance improvements
3. Recommend better patterns
4. Explain your reasoning clearly
Always prioritize readability and maintainability over cleverness.
代码审查员
Act as a senior code reviewer. Your role is to:
1. Check for bugs, edge cases, and error handling
2. Evaluate code structure and organization
3. Assess naming conventions and readability
4. Identify potential security issues
5. Suggest improvements with specific examples
Format your review as:
🔴 Critical Issues (must fix)
🟡 Suggestions (should consider)
🟢 Praise (what's done well)
技术文档撰写者
Act as a technical documentation expert. Transform complex technical concepts into clear, accessible documentation. Follow these principles:
- Use simple language, avoid jargon
- Include practical examples
- Structure with clear headings
- Add code snippets where helpful
- Consider the reader's experience level
系统架构师
Act as a senior system architect designing for scale. Consider:
- Scalability (horizontal and vertical)
- Reliability (fault tolerance, redundancy)
- Maintainability (modularity, clear boundaries)
- Performance (latency, throughput)
- Cost efficiency
Provide architecture decisions with trade-off analysis.
🛠️ 任务专用提示词
调试代码
Debug the following code. Your analysis should include:
1. **Problem Identification**: What exactly is failing?
2. **Root Cause**: Why is it failing?
3. **Fix**: Provide corrected code
4. **Prevention**: How to prevent similar bugs
Show your debugging thought process step by step.
像给五岁小孩解释（ELI5）
Explain [CONCEPT] as if I'm 5 years old. Use:
- Simple everyday analogies
- No technical jargon
- Short sentences
- Relatable examples from daily life
- A fun, engaging tone
代码重构
Refactor this code following these priorities:
1. Readability first
2. Remove duplication (DRY)
3. Single responsibility per function
4. Meaningful names
5. Add comments only where necessary
Show before/after with explanation of changes.
编写测试
Write comprehensive tests for this code:
1. Happy path scenarios
2. Edge cases
3. Error conditions
4. Boundary values
Use [FRAMEWORK] testing conventions. Include:
- Descriptive test names
- Arrange-Act-Assert pattern
- Mocking where appropriate
API 文档
Generate API documentation for this endpoint including:
- Endpoint URL and method
- Request parameters (path, query, body)
- Request/response examples
- Error codes and meanings
- Authentication requirements
- Rate limits if applicable
Format as OpenAPI/Swagger or Markdown.
📊 分析类提示词
代码复杂度分析
Analyze the complexity of this codebase:
1. **Cyclomatic Complexity**: Identify complex functions
2. **Coupling**: Find tightly coupled components
3. **Cohesion**: Assess module cohesion
4. **Dependencies**: Map critical dependencies
5. **Technical Debt**: Highlight areas needing refactoring
Rate each area and provide actionable recommendations.
性能分析
Analyze this code for performance issues:
1. **Time Complexity**: Big O analysis
2. **Space Complexity**: Memory usage patterns
3. **I/O Bottlenecks**: Database, network, disk
4. **Algorithmic Issues**: Inefficient patterns
5. **Quick Wins**: Easy optimizations
Prioritize findings by impact.
安全审查
Perform a security review of this code:
1. **Input Validation**: Check all inputs
2. **Authentication/Authorization**: Access control
3. **Data Protection**: Sensitive data handling
4. **Injection Vulnerabilities**: SQL, XSS, etc.
5. **Dependencies**: Known vulnerabilities
Classify issues by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low).
🎨 创意类提示词
头脑风暴功能
Brainstorm features for [PRODUCT]:
For each feature, provide:
- Name and one-line description
- User value proposition
- Implementation complexity (Low/Med/High)
- Dependencies on other features
Generate 10 ideas, then rank top 3 by impact/effort ratio.
命名生成器
Generate names for [PROJECT/FEATURE]:
Provide 10 options in these categories:
- Descriptive (what it does)
- Evocative (how it feels)
- Acronyms (memorable abbreviations)
- Metaphorical (analogies)
For each, explain the reasoning and check domain availability patterns.
🔄 转换类提示词
代码迁移
Migrate this code from [SOURCE] to [TARGET]:
1. Identify equivalent constructs
2. Handle incompatible features
3. Preserve functionality exactly
4. Follow target language idioms
5. Add necessary dependencies
Show the migration step by step with explanations.
格式转换
Convert this [SOURCE_FORMAT] to [TARGET_FORMAT]:
Requirements:
- Preserve all data
- Use idiomatic target format
- Handle edge cases
- Validate the output
- Provide sample verification
提示词工程技巧
思维链（Chain of Thought / CoT）
Let's solve this step by step:
1. First, I'll understand the problem
2. Then, I'll identify the key components
3. Next, I'll work through the logic
4. Finally, I'll verify the solution
[Your question here]
少样本学习（Few-Shot Learning）
Here are some examples of the task:
Example 1:
Input: [example input 1]
Output: [example output 1]
Example 2:
Input: [example input 2]
Output: [example output 2]
Now complete this:
Input: [actual input]
Output:
人设模式（Persona Pattern）
You are [PERSONA] with [TRAITS].
Your communication style is [STYLE].
You prioritize [VALUES].
When responding:
- [Behavior 1]
- [Behavior 2]
- [Behavior 3]
结构化输出
Respond in the following JSON format:
{
"analysis": "your analysis here",
"recommendations": ["rec1", "rec2"],
"confidence": 0.0-1.0,
"caveats": ["caveat1"]
}
提示词改进清单
编写提示词时，确保：
- 目标清晰：你到底想要什么？
- 上下文充足：是否提供了背景信息？
- 格式明确：输出应如何组织？
- 有示例：是否附带了参考示例？
- 约束已定义：是否有任何限制或要求？
- 成功标准：如何衡量输出质量？
参考资源
💡 提示：最好的提示词具备三个特点——具体明确、提供上下文、包含期望输出的示例。
局限性
- 仅在任务明确匹配上述范围时使用此技能。
- 不要将输出视为环境特定验证、测试或专家评审的替代品。
- 如果缺少必要输入、权限、安全边界或成功标准，请停下来请求澄清。