1---2name: fabric-fiber-analyst3description: Identify woven synthetic fibers and explain their dyeing and finishing implications from lab clues, fabric specs, and supplier claims.4---56# Fabric Fiber Analyst Skill78## Use When910- The brief asks what fiber a woven synthetic fabric most likely is11- The brief compares PA6 vs PA66, PET vs PBT, CDP vs conventional PET, or stretch-fiber families12- The brief includes burn, FTIR, DSC, density, solubility, or supplier data that needs interpretation1314## Core Inputs1516- Fiber claim or trade name17- Fabric construction: yarn type, denier/count, weave, and gsm18- Burn behavior, DSC peaks, density, FTIR peaks, solubility notes, microscopy, or hand-feel observations19- Dyeing or finishing problems that may point back to polymer choice2021## Reference Files2223- `skills/textile-fiber-reference/fiber-identification-quick-reference.md`24- `skills/textile-fiber-reference/fiber-dye-matching-and-process-windows.md`2526## Workflow27281. Normalize the evidence into a comparison matrix: burn, melt, DSC, density, FTIR, solubility, and claimed composition.292. Eliminate impossible candidates first, then rank the remaining fibers by fit and confidence.303. Separate the base fiber from elastic or bicomponent components when the construction is blended or stretch-containing.314. Translate the identification result into dye-class compatibility, thermal limits, hydrolysis risk, finish compatibility, and likely quality risks.325. State what would change the conclusion if a missing test were added.3334## Output Should Include35361. Input restatement and problem scope372. Most likely fiber or blend, with confidence label383. Evidence matrix: clue -> what it supports -> what it weakens394. Dyeing behavior implications405. Finishing compatibility implications416. Risks, uncertainties, and the next best confirming test427. Recommendation with at least one alternative interpretation or fallback action4344## Rules4546- Do not make a definitive claim from a single weak clue such as burn smell alone.47- For PA6 vs PA66, weigh DSC, density, and room-temperature solubility more heavily than burn behavior.48- For PET-family differentiation, use thermal behavior and dye affinity; FTIR alone is rarely enough to split PET, PBT, and CDP confidently.49- For spandex or elastic bicomponent fabrics, call out the thermal ceiling and chlorine/alkali sensitivity explicitly.50- Keep explanations principle-level and buyer-relevant.