Latifox Run the workflow in workflows/pivot-optimization.md.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
If the user named a single variable to change (pricing, audience, channel,
platform, feature emphasis) - for example "what if I charged per client instead of
per seat" - run the Micro-pivot path: skip weakness detection, generate exactly
one option with pivot_scope: micro and variables_changed: 1, then re-score it.
If that named change fails the Minimum Viable Pivot Criteria, say so plainly rather
than substituting a different pivot.
Otherwise run the standard chain: confirm the current score, detect weaknesses and their root causes, generate two or three options, and re-score the best one.
Apply the Slug Rule when deciding where output lands. One variable changed updates
the idea in place. Two variables, a change of business_model, or a change of the
core problem creates memory/ideas/<slug>-<pivot-word>/ with pivot_of set, and
pauses the original with superseded_by.
Only addressable_weaknesses are pivot targets. A knowledge gap means a dimension
file is missing or thin; send it back to that research skill instead.