Meeting Prep
Overview
Win rates are decided before the call. This skill produces a one-page brief:
account snapshot, attendee profiles, tailored question banks, and — for active
deals — a MEDDICC gap analysis showing which dimensions still need evidence.
SPICED (Winning by Design) structures early discovery conversations.
Gap Selling (Keenan) deepens problem diagnosis — current state, future state, quantified gap, root cause, happy-ears guardrails.
MEDDICC (Andy Whyte) scores deal qualification with evidence. They do not
contradict — SPICED uncovers; MEDDICC scores. Both map to the same CRM fields
defined in pipeline-management.
When to Use
- "Prep me for a call with [company]"
- "Discovery questions for [prospect]"
- "MEDDICC score this deal" or "what's missing on MEDDICC?"
- "Champion test — is this contact a real champion?"
- "Brief me before my demo / exec meeting"
- "Pre-call research for [account]"
For full sales process design, load pipeline-management first.
Authoritative Foundations
- Winning by Design — SPICED. Situation, Pain, Impact, Critical Event,
Decision — progressive discovery in Connect and Discovery stages. Critical
Event is the urgency gate: no CE, no timeline.
- Keenan — Gap Selling. Problem Centric™ discovery: map Current State
(situation, problem, impact, root cause, emotions) → Future State → Gap.
Spend ~25% of cycle on diagnosis; build Problem Identification Chart before
calls. Anti-pattern: happy ears — validate impact, don't assume yes.
Full playbook →
references/keenan-gap-selling.md.
- Andy Whyte — MEDDICC (MEDDICC.com). Seven dimensions scored 0/1/2 with
evidence: Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process,
Identify Pain, Champion, Competition. "Always Be Qualifying" — re-score after
every interaction. Champion must pass four tests before Proposal.
- Force Management — MEDDICC Methodology. Source framework for enterprise
qualification; Whyte's scorecard operationalizes it for deal inspection.
- Huthwaite — SPIN. Question flow for conversational discovery — complements
SPICED, does not replace it.
- Challenger — Teach-Tailor-Take Control. Lead with insight, not interrogation.
SPICED + MEDDICC — how they work together
| Call Type |
Lead With |
Score With |
| First discovery |
SPICED + Gap Selling (current state) |
Light MEDDICC (note gaps) |
| Second+ meeting |
SPICED gaps + Gap (future state) |
Full MEDDICC scorecard |
| Pre-proposal / exec |
Economic buyer prep |
MEDDICC must be ≥10/14 |
| Deal review (internal) |
— |
MEDDICC evidence inspection |
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Account Research (5 min)
- Company size, industry, revenue, headquarters
- Recent news (funding, hires, launches) — potential Critical Events
- Tech stack and pain signals
- Competitive landscape and status quo risk
Phase 2: Attendee Research
Per attendee: role, tenure, priorities, LinkedIn activity, likely MEDDICC role
(Champion? Economic Buyer? Technical Buyer? Blocker?).
Phase 3: SPICED Question Bank (Discovery Calls)
| SPICED |
Question Examples |
| Situation |
"Walk me through how your team handles [process] today." |
| Pain |
"What's the most frustrating part of that approach?" |
| Impact |
"What does that cost you annually — rough order of magnitude?" |
| Critical Event |
"Why is fixing this a priority now versus six months from now?" |
| Decision |
"If we find a fit, what does your evaluation process look like?" |
Phase 4: MEDDICC Question Bank (Qualification Calls)
| Dimension |
Question Examples |
Confirmed When |
| Metrics |
"How would you measure success 12 months after implementation?" |
Baseline + target KPI documented |
| Economic Buyer |
"Who ultimately approves budget for initiatives like this?" |
EB named; meeting scheduled or completed |
| Decision Criteria |
"What are the must-haves vs nice-to-haves in your evaluation?" |
Criteria list documented |
| Decision Process |
"Walk me through each step from today to signed contract." |
Steps, owners, dates mapped |
| Identify Pain |
"What happens if this problem isn't solved by [date]?" |
Quantified cost of inaction |
| Champion |
"Would you be comfortable presenting this internally without us?" |
Four-part Champion test passed |
| Competition |
"Who else are you evaluating — including doing nothing?" |
Competitors + status quo named |
Phase 5: Andy Whyte — Champion Test
Score the contact before calling them a Champion:
| # |
Criterion |
Evidence Required |
| 1 |
Power to influence the decision |
Can access EB and decision committee |
| 2 |
Personal win if deal closes |
Career, team, or KPI benefit articulated |
| 3 |
Articulates problem without you |
Repeats pain accurately in their words |
| 4 |
Commits to internal selling |
Agrees to present or multi-thread on your behalf |
All four required for Champion score = 2. Enthusiasm alone = 1 at best.
Phase 6: MEDDICC Gap Analysis (Active Deals)
If CRM data exists, score current state and list gaps to close on this call:
MEDDICC Score: __/14
Gaps to close this meeting:
- [ ] Metrics — need quantified baseline
- [ ] Economic Buyer — identified but not met
- ...
Load pipeline-management for stage gate minimums before advancing the deal.
Phase 7: Competitive Context
- Named competitors and status quo
- Decision criteria influence strategy (
competitive-intel)
- Trap-setting questions for differentiators
Output Format
One-page meeting brief. Use templates/output-template.md for structure.
# Meeting Brief: [Company]
Date | Attendees | Deal stage | MEDDICC score: __/14
## Company Snapshot
## Attendee Profiles (+ MEDDICC role)
## SPICED Questions (discovery)
## MEDDICC Questions (gaps to close)
## Champion Test (if applicable)
## Competitive Context
## Desired Outcome + Fallback
Quality Check
Common Pitfalls
MEDDICC as a discovery script. Running all seven dimensions on a first call
feels like an audit. Fix: SPICED first; MEDDICC scores build over calls.
Champion = friendly contact. Enthusiasm without power is score 1, not 2.
Fix: apply Whyte's four-part Champion test.
Vendor-defined Metrics. "You'll save 30%" is not M=2. Fix: buyer must
name the KPI and baseline.
Ignoring status quo as Competition. "No competitors" still has a competitor:
do nothing. Fix: always assess status quo.
SPICED and MEDDICC in separate silos. Reps capture Impact in SPICED notes
but leave Metrics blank. Fix: Impact field populates Metrics in CRM.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md — SPICED/MEDDICC map, Champion test, question banks
templates/output-template.md — one-page brief structure
scripts/check-output.py — validates brief sections
references/keenan-gap-selling.md — Gap Selling discovery, PIC, happy ears, checklists
Related Skills
pipeline-management — Stage gates, CRM fields, MEDDICC scorecard rules
sales-coaching — Manager deal review using same scorecard
competitive-intel — Battlecards for Competition dimension
multi-thread-orchestration — When Champion cannot access EB alone
roi-calculator — Metrics dimension business case
demo-scripts — Post-discovery demo structure
1---2name: meeting-prep3description: Prepare meeting briefs with SPICED discovery (WbD) and MEDDICC qualification (Andy Whyte) — account research, attendee profiles, question banks, scorecard gaps, and competitive context. Use before discovery calls, demos, executive meetings, or deal reviews. Triggers on: "meeting prep", "call prep", "discovery prep", "MEDDICC", "MEDDIC", "qualify this deal", "pre-call research", "discovery questions", "champion test", "economic buyer".4license: MIT5---67# Meeting Prep89## Overview1011Win rates are decided before the call. This skill produces a one-page brief:12account snapshot, attendee profiles, tailored question banks, and — for active13deals — a MEDDICC gap analysis showing which dimensions still need evidence.1415**SPICED** (Winning by Design) structures early discovery conversations.16**Gap Selling** (Keenan) deepens problem diagnosis — current state, future state, quantified gap, root cause, happy-ears guardrails.17**MEDDICC** (Andy Whyte) scores deal qualification with evidence. They do not18contradict — SPICED uncovers; MEDDICC scores. Both map to the same CRM fields19defined in `pipeline-management`.2021## When to Use2223- "Prep me for a call with [company]"24- "Discovery questions for [prospect]"25- "MEDDICC score this deal" or "what's missing on MEDDICC?"26- "Champion test — is this contact a real champion?"27- "Brief me before my demo / exec meeting"28- "Pre-call research for [account]"2930For full sales process design, load `pipeline-management` first.3132## Authoritative Foundations3334- **Winning by Design — SPICED.** Situation, Pain, Impact, Critical Event,35 Decision — progressive discovery in Connect and Discovery stages. Critical36 Event is the urgency gate: no CE, no timeline.37- **Keenan — Gap Selling.** Problem Centric™ discovery: map Current State38 (situation, problem, impact, root cause, emotions) → Future State → Gap.39 Spend ~25% of cycle on diagnosis; build Problem Identification Chart before40 calls. Anti-pattern: **happy ears** — validate impact, don't assume yes.41 Full playbook → `references/keenan-gap-selling.md`.42- **Andy Whyte — MEDDICC (MEDDICC.com).** Seven dimensions scored 0/1/2 with43 evidence: Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process,44 Identify Pain, Champion, Competition. "Always Be Qualifying" — re-score after45 every interaction. Champion must pass four tests before Proposal.46- **Force Management — MEDDICC Methodology.** Source framework for enterprise47 qualification; Whyte's scorecard operationalizes it for deal inspection.48- **Huthwaite — SPIN.** Question flow for conversational discovery — complements49 SPICED, does not replace it.50- **Challenger — Teach-Tailor-Take Control.** Lead with insight, not interrogation.5152### SPICED + MEDDICC — how they work together5354| Call Type | Lead With | Score With |55|---|---|---|56| First discovery | SPICED + Gap Selling (current state) | Light MEDDICC (note gaps) |57| Second+ meeting | SPICED gaps + Gap (future state) | Full MEDDICC scorecard |58| Pre-proposal / exec | Economic buyer prep | MEDDICC must be ≥10/14 |59| Deal review (internal) | — | MEDDICC evidence inspection |6061## Step-by-Step Process6263### Phase 1: Account Research (5 min)6465- Company size, industry, revenue, headquarters66- Recent news (funding, hires, launches) — potential Critical Events67- Tech stack and pain signals68- Competitive landscape and status quo risk6970### Phase 2: Attendee Research7172Per attendee: role, tenure, priorities, LinkedIn activity, likely MEDDICC role73(Champion? Economic Buyer? Technical Buyer? Blocker?).7475### Phase 3: SPICED Question Bank (Discovery Calls)7677| SPICED | Question Examples |78|---|---|79| **S**ituation | "Walk me through how your team handles [process] today." |80| **P**ain | "What's the most frustrating part of that approach?" |81| **I**mpact | "What does that cost you annually — rough order of magnitude?" |82| **C**ritical Event | "Why is fixing this a priority now versus six months from now?" |83| **D**ecision | "If we find a fit, what does your evaluation process look like?" |8485### Phase 4: MEDDICC Question Bank (Qualification Calls)8687| Dimension | Question Examples | Confirmed When |88|---|---|---|89| **M**etrics | "How would you measure success 12 months after implementation?" | Baseline + target KPI documented |90| **E**conomic Buyer | "Who ultimately approves budget for initiatives like this?" | EB named; meeting scheduled or completed |91| **D**ecision Criteria | "What are the must-haves vs nice-to-haves in your evaluation?" | Criteria list documented |92| **D**ecision Process | "Walk me through each step from today to signed contract." | Steps, owners, dates mapped |93| **I**dentify Pain | "What happens if this problem isn't solved by [date]?" | Quantified cost of inaction |94| **C**hampion | "Would you be comfortable presenting this internally without us?" | Four-part Champion test passed |95| **C**ompetition | "Who else are you evaluating — including doing nothing?" | Competitors + status quo named |9697### Phase 5: Andy Whyte — Champion Test9899Score the contact before calling them a Champion:100101| # | Criterion | Evidence Required |102|---|---|---|103| 1 | Power to influence the decision | Can access EB and decision committee |104| 2 | Personal win if deal closes | Career, team, or KPI benefit articulated |105| 3 | Articulates problem without you | Repeats pain accurately in their words |106| 4 | Commits to internal selling | Agrees to present or multi-thread on your behalf |107108All four required for Champion score = 2. Enthusiasm alone = 1 at best.109110### Phase 6: MEDDICC Gap Analysis (Active Deals)111112If CRM data exists, score current state and list gaps to close on this call:113114```115MEDDICC Score: __/14116Gaps to close this meeting:117- [ ] Metrics — need quantified baseline118- [ ] Economic Buyer — identified but not met119- ...120```121122Load `pipeline-management` for stage gate minimums before advancing the deal.123124### Phase 7: Competitive Context125126- Named competitors and status quo127- Decision criteria influence strategy (`competitive-intel`)128- Trap-setting questions for differentiators129130## Output Format131132One-page meeting brief. Use `templates/output-template.md` for structure.133134```135# Meeting Brief: [Company]136Date | Attendees | Deal stage | MEDDICC score: __/14137138## Company Snapshot139## Attendee Profiles (+ MEDDICC role)140## SPICED Questions (discovery)141## MEDDICC Questions (gaps to close)142## Champion Test (if applicable)143## Competitive Context144## Desired Outcome + Fallback145```146147## Quality Check148149- [ ] Account and attendee research current (last 30 days)150- [ ] Questions tailored to account — not generic templates151- [ ] SPICED questions included for discovery; MEDDICC for qualification deals152- [ ] Champion test applied if a champion is claimed153- [ ] MEDDICC gaps listed for active deals with target score for this meeting154- [ ] Brief readable in 60 seconds155- [ ] SPICED and MEDDICC map to same CRM fields — no conflicting data capture156157## Common Pitfalls1581591. **MEDDICC as a discovery script.** Running all seven dimensions on a first call160 feels like an audit. Fix: SPICED first; MEDDICC scores build over calls.1611622. **Champion = friendly contact.** Enthusiasm without power is score 1, not 2.163 Fix: apply Whyte's four-part Champion test.1641653. **Vendor-defined Metrics.** "You'll save 30%" is not M=2. Fix: buyer must166 name the KPI and baseline.1671684. **Ignoring status quo as Competition.** "No competitors" still has a competitor:169 do nothing. Fix: always assess status quo.1701715. **SPICED and MEDDICC in separate silos.** Reps capture Impact in SPICED notes172 but leave Metrics blank. Fix: Impact field populates Metrics in CRM.173174## Execution Artifacts175176- `references/framework-notes.md` — SPICED/MEDDICC map, Champion test, question banks177- `templates/output-template.md` — one-page brief structure178- `scripts/check-output.py` — validates brief sections179- `references/keenan-gap-selling.md` — Gap Selling discovery, PIC, happy ears, checklists180181## Related Skills182183- `pipeline-management` — Stage gates, CRM fields, MEDDICC scorecard rules184- `sales-coaching` — Manager deal review using same scorecard185- `competitive-intel` — Battlecards for Competition dimension186- `multi-thread-orchestration` — When Champion cannot access EB alone187- `roi-calculator` — Metrics dimension business case188- `demo-scripts` — Post-discovery demo structure