QBR Planning
Overview
A QBR is not a status update — it is a strategic alignment meeting that
demonstrates value delivered, aligns on future priorities, and sets the
stage for expansion. This skill builds QBR templates that executives want
to attend because they see clear ROI from the relationship.
When to Use
- "Plan a QBR"
- "Prepare for an executive business review"
- "Build a QBR deck"
- "Document value for a customer"
- "Structure a quarterly review"
Authoritative Foundations
Gainsight QBR methodology: QBRs should cover value realized, value roadmap,
and strategic alignment — not product updates. Winning by Design Bowtie
metrics: frame expansion within the customer's lifecycle, not your quota.
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Pre-QBR Preparation
Gather: usage metrics, support history, NPS/CSAT trends, expansion signals,
stakeholder map, competitor activity. Document value delivered in their
language — not your feature names.
Phase 2: QBR Structure
- Executive Summary — value delivered this quarter, in their words
- Metrics Review — adoption, usage, outcomes achieved vs. goals
- Success Stories — wins since last QBR
- Strategic Alignment — how this maps to their company priorities
- Roadmap Preview — what's coming, how it benefits them
- Expansion Opportunity — logical next steps, not a sales pitch
- Action Items — mutual commitments for next quarter
Phase 3: Delivery
60 minutes: 40 min presentation, 20 min discussion. Send deck 24 hours
in advance. Include their logo, their metrics, their language. This is
about them — not you.
Output Format
QBR deck template, value documentation template, stakeholder map, and
pre-QBR checklist.
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
Common Pitfalls
- Product update disguised as QBR — executives don't care about
feature releases. They care about business outcomes.
- Surprise expansion ask — if expansion is first mentioned at the
QBR, it's too late. Plant the seed months before.
- Your metrics, not theirs — "you logged in 50 times" means nothing.
"Your team reduced time-to-close by 40%" means everything.
- No action items — a QBR without mutual commitments is a meeting,
not a milestone.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md — named frameworks, citation anchors, and operating assumptions
templates/output-template.md — copy-paste deliverable structure for the user
scripts/check-output.py — local checklist validator for required sections
This skill includes lightweight artifacts the agent can load on demand:
Use the artifacts when the user asks for an implementation-ready deliverable, a repeatable workflow, or a quality check rather than generic advice.
Implementation Depth
Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation.
Diagnostic Questions
- What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led?
- Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed?
- What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none?
- What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow?
- What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure?
Framework Application
Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill:
- Gainsight QBR Methodology: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Winning by Design Bowtie Metrics: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Gainsight — Customer Success Maturity Model: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
Deliverable Standard
A strong output from this skill includes:
- A crisp diagnosis of the current situation
- A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list
- A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan
- A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators
- Risks and edge cases called out before execution
Adaptation Rules
- For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity.
- For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets.
- For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements.
Related Skills
- cs-playbooks: Full CS operating system
- customer-marketing: Case studies and advocacy from QBRs
- expansion-selling: Turn QBR insights into expansion
1---2name: qbr-planning3description: Plan and execute Quarterly Business Reviews — value documentation, ROI presentation, executive alignment, and expansion roadmap. Use when preparing for QBRs, business reviews with customers, or executive stakeholder meetings. Triggers on: "QBR", "quarterly business review", "executive business review", "customer review", "value review", or any request about strategic customer meetings.4license: MIT5---67# QBR Planning89## Overview10A QBR is not a status update — it is a strategic alignment meeting that11demonstrates value delivered, aligns on future priorities, and sets the12stage for expansion. This skill builds QBR templates that executives want13to attend because they see clear ROI from the relationship.1415## When to Use16- "Plan a QBR"17- "Prepare for an executive business review"18- "Build a QBR deck"19- "Document value for a customer"20- "Structure a quarterly review"2122## Authoritative Foundations23Gainsight QBR methodology: QBRs should cover value realized, value roadmap,24and strategic alignment — not product updates. Winning by Design Bowtie25metrics: frame expansion within the customer's lifecycle, not your quota.2627## Step-by-Step Process28### Phase 1: Pre-QBR Preparation29Gather: usage metrics, support history, NPS/CSAT trends, expansion signals,30stakeholder map, competitor activity. Document value delivered in their31language — not your feature names.3233### Phase 2: QBR Structure341. Executive Summary — value delivered this quarter, in their words352. Metrics Review — adoption, usage, outcomes achieved vs. goals363. Success Stories — wins since last QBR374. Strategic Alignment — how this maps to their company priorities385. Roadmap Preview — what's coming, how it benefits them396. Expansion Opportunity — logical next steps, not a sales pitch407. Action Items — mutual commitments for next quarter4142### Phase 3: Delivery4360 minutes: 40 min presentation, 20 min discussion. Send deck 24 hours44in advance. Include their logo, their metrics, their language. This is45about them — not you.4647## Output Format48QBR deck template, value documentation template, stakeholder map, and49pre-QBR checklist.505152## Quality Check5354Before delivering, verify:55- [ ] All required sections are complete56- [ ] Output matches the user's stated need57- [ ] Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations58- [ ] No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action59- [ ] Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual6061## Common Pitfalls621. **Product update disguised as QBR** — executives don't care about63 feature releases. They care about business outcomes.642. **Surprise expansion ask** — if expansion is first mentioned at the65 QBR, it's too late. Plant the seed months before.663. **Your metrics, not theirs** — "you logged in 50 times" means nothing.67 "Your team reduced time-to-close by 40%" means everything.684. **No action items** — a QBR without mutual commitments is a meeting,69 not a milestone.7071## Execution Artifacts7273- `references/framework-notes.md` — named frameworks, citation anchors, and operating assumptions74- `templates/output-template.md` — copy-paste deliverable structure for the user75- `scripts/check-output.py` — local checklist validator for required sections76This skill includes lightweight artifacts the agent can load on demand:77Use the artifacts when the user asks for an implementation-ready deliverable, a repeatable workflow, or a quality check rather than generic advice.7879## Implementation Depth8081Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation.8283### Diagnostic Questions84851. What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led?862. Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed?873. What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none?884. What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow?895. What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure?9091### Framework Application9293Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill:9495- Gainsight QBR Methodology: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.96- Winning by Design Bowtie Metrics: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.97- Gainsight — Customer Success Maturity Model: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.9899### Deliverable Standard100101A strong output from this skill includes:102103- A crisp diagnosis of the current situation104- A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list105- A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan106- A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators107- Risks and edge cases called out before execution108109### Adaptation Rules110111- For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity.112- For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets.113- For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements.114115116## Related Skills117- **cs-playbooks**: Full CS operating system118- **customer-marketing**: Case studies and advocacy from QBRs119- **expansion-selling**: Turn QBR insights into expansion