Aif Build Automation

Build Automation Generator

Generate or enhance a build automation file for any project. Supports Makefile, Taskfile.yml, Justfile, and Magefile.go.

Two modes:

• Generate — No build file exists → create one from scratch using best-practice templates
• Enhance — Build file already exists → analyze gaps, add missing targets, fix anti-patterns, preserve existing work

Step 0: Load Project Context

Read the project description if available:

Read .ai-factory/DESCRIPTION.md

Store the project context (tech stack, framework, architecture) for use in later steps. If the file doesn't exist, that's fine — we'll detect everything in Step 2.

Read .ai-factory/skill-context/aif-build-automation/SKILL.md — MANDATORY if the file exists.

This file contains project-specific rules accumulated by /aif-evolve from patches, codebase conventions, and tech-stack analysis. These rules are tailored to the current project.

How to apply skill-context rules:

• Treat them as project-level overrides for this skill's general instructions
• When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md, the skill-context rule wins (more specific context takes priority — same principle as nested CLAUDE.md files)
• When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context
• Do NOT ignore skill-context rules even if they seem to contradict this skill's defaults — they exist because the project's experience proved the default insufficient
• CRITICAL: skill-context rules apply to ALL outputs of this skill — including the generated build files (Makefile, Taskfile, justfile, magefile). Templates in this skill are base structures. If a skill-context rule says "build file MUST include target X" or "MUST follow convention Y" — you MUST comply. Generating build automation that violates skill-context rules is a bug.

Enforcement: After generating any output artifact, verify it against all skill-context rules. If any rule is violated — fix the output before presenting it to the user.

Step 1: Detect Existing Build Files & Determine Mode

1.1 Scan for Existing Build Files

Before anything else, check if the project already has build automation:

Glob: Makefile, makefile, GNUmakefile, Taskfile.yml, Taskfile.yaml, taskfile.yml, justfile, Justfile, .justfile, magefile.go, magefiles/*.go

Build a list of EXISTING_FILES from the results.

1.2 Determine Mode

Mode A — Enhance Existing (if EXISTING_FILES is not empty):

• Set MODE = "enhance"
• Set TARGET_TOOL automatically from the detected file (Makefile → makefile, Taskfile.yml → taskfile, etc.)
• If multiple build files exist AND $ARGUMENTS specifies one, use the argument to pick which one to enhance
• If multiple build files exist AND no argument, ask which one to enhance:

AskUserQuestion: This project has multiple build files. Which one should I improve?

Options (dynamic, based on what exists):
1. Makefile — Enhance the existing Makefile
2. Taskfile.yml — Enhance the existing Taskfile
...

• Read the existing file content — this is the baseline for enhancement
• Store as EXISTING_CONTENT

Mode B — Generate New (if EXISTING_FILES is empty):

• Set MODE = "generate"
• Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine tool:

• If $ARGUMENTS is empty or doesn't match, ask the user interactively:

AskUserQuestion: Which build automation tool do you want to generate?

Options:
1. Makefile — GNU Make (universal, no install needed)
2. Taskfile.yml — Task runner (YAML, modern, cross-platform)
3. justfile — Just command runner (simple, fast, ergonomic)
4. magefile.go — Mage (Go-native, type-safe, no shell scripts)

Store the chosen tool as TARGET_TOOL.

Step 2: Analyze Project

Detect the project profile by scanning the repository with Glob and Grep. Use the same flow for every stack: primary language → package manager / build entrypoints → frameworks → Docker → CI → migrations → tests → linters → monorepo, then the Summary object. JVM projects are handled inside those steps (not a separate pipeline).

2.1 Primary Language

Check for these files (first match wins in the table order below). For Java / Kotlin (JVM), infer language from build files: default Java unless Kotlin plugins / kotlin("jvm") / dominant .kt layout suggests Kotlin.

2.2 Package manager & build entrypoints

Lock files and wrappers (same idea as package-lock.json → npm):

Java / Kotlin (JVM) — Gradle vs Maven: Detect Gradle with one batch of checks (single Glob over the paths below, or parallel existence checks — avoid redundant sequential walks):

• settings.gradle, settings.gradle.kts, build.gradle, build.gradle.kts (repo root), gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties

If any Gradle signal matches → Gradle is in play. pom.xml indicates Maven. Set PROJECT_PROFILE.java_build.build_tool from this table:

Concrete JVM Entrypoint: Persist the detected entrypoint in PROJECT_PROFILE.build_entrypoint based on wrapper presence:

• If build_tool is gradle: use ./gradlew if gradlew or gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties exists, else fallback to gradle.
• If build_tool is maven: use ./mvnw if mvnw or .mvn/wrapper/maven-wrapper.properties exists, else fallback to mvn.

Single source of truth: The predicate above is the same rule the JVM templates implement in shell (ENTRYPOINT / entrypoint — test ./gradlew or gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties; test ./mvnw or .mvn/wrapper/maven-wrapper.properties). When generating or enhancing build files, set PROJECT_PROFILE.build_entrypoint to the result those tests imply (./gradlew vs gradle, ./mvnw vs mvn). Do not emit a different entrypoint string than that predicate unless the user overrides (e.g. Makefile ENTRYPOINT=…). Templates re-resolve at recipe runtime so clones stay correct without editing.

Version catalog: If gradle/libs.versions.toml exists, set java_build.has_version_catalog and document PROJECT_PROFILE.build_entrypoint / catalog usage in comments where helpful.

Commands to wire into Makefile / Taskfile / Just for JVM (same role as npm run build / pytest for other stacks; use gradlew.bat on Windows):

dev target (templates + generated files): Resolve the framework dev task/goal from the same signals as §2.3, fixed priority (first match wins): Quarkus → Micronaut → Vert.x → Spring Boot. Scan Gradle: build.gradle, build.gradle.kts, settings.gradle, settings.gradle.kts, gradle/libs.versions.toml with the same grep -E patterns you use for §2.3 (quarkus / io.quarkus; micronaut / io.micronaut; Vert.x Gradle plugin — vertx-plugin or io.vertx.vertx; Spring Boot — fallback). Scan Maven: pom.xml only; Vert.x Maven — vertx-maven-plugin or io.reactiverse. If the repo root is an aggregator and detection misses, override the template’s dev task variable (same idea as JVM_MODULE).

Templates: JVM Makefile/Taskfile/Just ship a fixed catalog: lint → Gradle check / Maven verify; fmt → spotlessApply / spotless:apply; lint-checkstyle, lint-spotbugs, lint-pmd, lint-spotless (Taskfile lint:*); db-migrate-liquibase, db-migrate-flyway (Taskfile db:migrate:*). Multi-module: module-* with JVM_MODULE. Step 5 removes catalog entries the repo does not wire (see JVM template rules).

2.3 Framework Detection

For Node.js projects, check package.json dependencies for:

• next → Next.js
• nuxt → Nuxt
• @remix-run/node → Remix
• express → Express
• fastify → Fastify
• hono → Hono
• @nestjs/core → NestJS

For Python projects, check pyproject.toml or imports for:

• fastapi → FastAPI
• django → Django
• flask → Flask

For PHP projects, check composer.json require for:

• laravel/framework → Laravel
• symfony/framework-bundle → Symfony
• slim/slim → Slim
• cakephp/cakephp → CakePHP

For Go projects, check go.mod for:

• gin-gonic/gin → Gin
• labstack/echo → Echo
• gofiber/fiber → Fiber
• go-chi/chi → Chi

For Rust projects, read Cargo.toml (workspace members and [dependencies] / [workspace.dependencies]) for:

• axum → Axum
• actix-web → Actix Web
• rocket → Rocket
• warp → Warp

For Ruby projects, read Gemfile for:

• rails → Ruby on Rails
• sinatra → Sinatra
• hanami → Hanami
• roda → Roda

For Java / JVM projects, read pom.xml, build.gradle*, and gradle/libs.versions.toml (when present) for dependencies and plugins — same discovery depth as package.json for Node:

• spring-boot, spring-boot-starter, spring-boot-parent → Spring Boot
• grpc, protobuf, spring-grpc or *.proto in repo → gRPC / protobuf
• quarkus, io.quarkus → Quarkus
• micronaut → Micronaut
• vertx / Vert.x stack → Vert.x
• liquibase in deps or db.changelog* → Liquibase (see §2.6)
• Flyway org.flywaydb / flyway-core / flyway-maven-plugin / Flyway Gradle plugin in pom.xml, build.gradle*, or gradle/libs.versions.toml → Flyway (see §2.6)
• Prefer Jakarta (jakarta.*) for Java 9+ / Spring Boot 3+; flag legacy javax.* migration if both appear

Map findings into framework / java_build flags (spring_boot, grpc, liquibase, flyway) like other ecosystems map Express vs NestJS.

2.4 Docker (Deep Scan)

Glob: Dockerfile, Dockerfile.*, docker-compose.yml, docker-compose.yaml, compose.yml, compose.yaml, .dockerignore

If any exist, set HAS_DOCKER=true and perform a deeper analysis:

Read the Dockerfile(s) to detect:

• Multi-stage builds (separate dev / prod stages) → DOCKER_MULTISTAGE=true
• Exposed ports → DOCKER_PORTS (e.g., 3000, 8080)
• Base image → DOCKER_BASE (e.g., node:20-alpine, golang:1.22)
• Entrypoint/CMD → understand how the app is started inside the container

Read docker-compose / compose file to detect:

• Service names → DOCKER_SERVICES (e.g., app, db, redis, worker)
• Volume mounts → understand dev vs prod setup
• Profiles (if any) → dev, production, test
• Dependency services (postgres, redis, rabbitmq, etc.) → DOCKER_DEPS

Store as DOCKER_PROFILE:

• has_compose: boolean
• has_multistage: boolean
• services: list of service names
• deps: list of infrastructure services (db, cache, queue)
• ports: exposed ports
• has_dev_stage: boolean (Dockerfile has a dev or development stage)

2.5 CI/CD

Glob: .github/workflows/*.yml, .gitlab-ci.yml, .circleci/config.yml, Jenkinsfile, .travis.yml

Note which CI system is in use.

2.6 Database & Migrations

Search for migration tools:

Grep: prisma|drizzle|knex|typeorm|sequelize|alembic|django.*migrate|goose|migrate|atlas|sqlx|liquibase|flyway

Check for:

• prisma/schema.prisma → Prisma
• drizzle.config.ts → Drizzle
• alembic/ directory → Alembic
• migrations/ directory → Generic migrations
• Liquibase — db.changelog*, liquibase in Gradle/Maven or resources → Liquibase (JVM and others); set java_build.liquibase: true
• Flyway — dependency or plugin (org.flywaydb, flyway-core, flyway-maven-plugin, Flyway Gradle plugin) in pom.xml, build.gradle*, or gradle/libs.versions.toml; set java_build.flyway: true

2.7 Test Framework

2.8 Linters & Formatters

Scan for formatter/linter configs (EditorConfig, Checkstyle on JVM, ESLint/Prettier/Biome, Python tools, PHP, Go, Rust, Ruby):

Glob: .eslintrc*, eslint.config.*, .prettierrc*, biome.json, biome.jsonc, .golangci.yml, .golangci.yaml
Glob: checkstyle.xml, .checkstyle.xml, config/checkstyle/checkstyle.xml, .editorconfig
Glob: ruff.toml, .ruff.toml, .flake8, phpcs.xml, phpcs.xml.dist
Glob: rustfmt.toml, .rustfmt.toml, clippy.toml, .rubocop.yml, .rubocop_todo.yml, .standard.yml
Grep in pyproject.toml: ruff|black|flake8|pylint|isort
Grep in build.gradle*, pom.xml: spotless|spotbugs|pmd|errorprone|checkstyle (when not covered by config files alone)

Merge JVM matches into PROJECT_PROFILE.linters as normalized ids (e.g. checkstyle, spotless, spotbugs, pmd, errorprone) for use when wiring lint / fmt targets (Step 5).

2.9 Monorepo Detection

Glob: turbo.json, nx.json, lerna.json, pnpm-workspace.yaml

Summary

Build a PROJECT_PROFILE object with:

• language: primary language
• package_manager: detected PM (npm, pnpm, Gradle, Maven, …)
• build_entrypoint: the exact entrypoint command detected (e.g. ./gradlew, mvn, npm, cargo)
• framework: detected framework (if any); JVM frameworks map here the same way as NestJS or Django
• warnings: optional string array (e.g. mixed Maven+Gradle from §2.2)
• java_build: optional — when language is JVM: { build_tool: "gradle"|"maven", mixed_maven_gradle?: boolean, has_version_catalog: boolean, spring_boot: boolean, grpc: boolean, liquibase: boolean, flyway: boolean }
• has_docker: boolean
• docker_profile: DOCKER_PROFILE object (if has_docker)
• ci_system: detected CI (if any)
• has_migrations: boolean + tool name
• test_framework: detected test runner
• linters: list of detected linters
• is_monorepo: boolean
• has_dev_server: boolean (framework with dev server)

Step 3: Read Best Practices

Read the best practices reference for the chosen tool:

Read skills/aif-build-automation/references/BEST-PRACTICES.md

Focus on the section matching TARGET_TOOL:

• Makefile → Section 1
• Taskfile → Section 2
• Justfile → Section 3
• Magefile → Section 4

Also read the "Cross-Cutting Concerns" section for standard targets.

Step 4: Select & Read Template

Pick the closest matching template based on language + TARGET_TOOL:

For Java / JVM, select the Gradle or Maven template based on PROJECT_PROFILE.java_build.build_tool.

If language is not among Go, Node.js, Python, PHP, Rust, Ruby, or Java / JVM in the table above, use the Node.js template as the structural fallback and adapt it to the detected build_entrypoint and language conventions (e.g., dotnet build).

For Magefile: use magefile-full.go if HAS_DOCKER or has_migrations is true, otherwise magefile-basic.go.

For PHP, Rust, Ruby, or Java/JVM + Magefile: Mage is Go-specific and not generally applicable to these stacks. If the user explicitly requested mage for such a project, explain this and suggest Makefile as the closest alternative (universal, no install needed). Ask via AskUserQuestion whether to proceed with Makefile instead.

Read the selected template:

Read skills/aif-build-automation/templates/<selected-template>

Step 5: Generate or Enhance File

Mode B — Generate New File

Using the PROJECT_PROFILE, best practices, and template as reference, generate a customized build file from scratch.

Generation Rules

1. Start with the tool's required preamble (from best practices)
2. Include all standard targets from the selected template (help/default, build, test, lint, clean, dev, fmt, ci). JVM: the template is a complete catalog; prune targets in Mode B per Step 5 JVM rules (do not invent one-off lint recipes).
3. Add conditional targets based on project profile:
   • Docker targets → only if has_docker
   • Database targets → only if has_migrations (non-JVM); JVM: use the canonical db-migrate-liquibase / db-migrate-flyway (or Taskfile db:migrate:*) only when the matching java_build flag is true — omit the other
   • Deploy targets → only if CI/CD detected
   • Generate target → only if code generation detected
   • Typecheck target → only if TypeScript or mypy detected
4. Use correct package manager — match PROJECT_PROFILE (§2.2): JVM → <build_entrypoint> (from §2.2); Node → npm/pnpm/yarn/bun; Python → uv/poetry/pip; Go → go; Rust → cargo; Ruby → Bundler (bundle, bundle exec); do not substitute the wrong ecosystem (e.g. npm scripts for a Gradle-only repo)
5. Include CI aggregate target — default ci = clean + build on JVM (already runs check/verify); add lint / fmt to ci only if those targets remain after pruning
6. Follow the template's structure for organization and grouping
7. Adapt variable names to match the actual project (module name, binary name, source dirs); JVM multi-module repos → set JVM_MODULE for module-* targets (§2.2)
8. Include version/commit/build-time detection via git
9. Docker-aware targets — if has_docker, generate a dedicated Docker section (see below)

JVM template catalog (fixed names; prune unused tools in Mode B) — Source of truth is skills/aif-build-automation/templates/*gradle* and *maven*. Always use these exact Gradle/Maven task names in generated files unless the build files use a different official task name for the same plugin (document in a comment next to the recipe).

• Mode B (generate): Copy the catalog from the template, then delete targets whose tools are absent: e.g. remove lint-checkstyle if checkstyle ∉ linters; remove lint-spotbugs / lint-pmd if those ids are missing; remove fmt and lint-spotless if spotless ∉ linters; remove db-migrate-liquibase if not java_build.liquibase; remove db-migrate-flyway if not java_build.flyway. Always keep lint (= check / verify) unless the project truly has no Java plugin lifecycle (rare). Never substitute verify -DskipTests or check -x test as lint. For dev, templates already resolve the task/goal from build files; when enhancing, replace a wrong constant bootRun / spring-boot:run with the correct framework command from PROJECT_PROFILE (same strings as the template resolver).
• Mode A (enhance): Prefer missing catalog targets over ad-hoc names; remove recipes that contradict java_build / linters.

Docker-Aware Target Generation

When has_docker is true, generate two layers of commands:

Layer 1 — Container lifecycle (always when Docker detected):

Layer 2 — Dev vs Production separation (when compose or multistage detected):

##@ Docker — Development
docker-dev:          ## Start all services in dev mode (with hot reload, mounted volumes)
docker-dev-build:    ## Rebuild dev containers
docker-dev-down:     ## Stop dev environment and remove volumes

##@ Docker — Production
docker-prod-build:   ## Build production image (optimized, multi-stage)
docker-prod-run:     ## Run production container locally for testing
docker-prod-push:    ## Push production image to registry

Generation logic:

• If has_compose → use docker compose commands (not docker-compose)
• If compose has profiles → use --profile dev / --profile production
• If has_multistage → use --target dev for dev builds, no target (or --target production) for prod
• If docker_profile.deps exist (db, redis, etc.) → add infra-up / infra-down targets to start/stop only infrastructure services without the app
• If compose detected → docker-dev should run docker compose up with correct profile/services
• If no compose but Dockerfile → docker-dev should run docker build --target dev + docker run with volume mounts

Layer 3 — Container-based commands (mirror host commands via container):

When the project is Docker-based, also generate container-exec variants so that users who run everything in Docker can use the same targets:

# Run tests inside the container
docker-test:         ## Run tests inside the Docker container
  docker compose exec app [test command]

# Run linter inside the container
docker-lint:         ## Run linter inside the Docker container
  docker compose exec app [lint command]

# Open shell in the container
docker-shell:        ## Open a shell inside the running container
  docker compose exec app sh

Only generate docker-* exec variants if the project appears to be Docker-first (compose file mounts source code as volumes, or no local language runtime setup is apparent).

Customization from Project Profile

• JVM (java_build / Gradle or Maven): Use PROJECT_PROFILE.build_entrypoint from §2.2 Summary for every tool invocation. Quality and DB: use only the canonical target names and task names from the JVM template catalog (Step 5 table); when enhancing, add/remove recipes to match java_build and linters, not one-off guesses.
• Binary name: Use the actual project name from go.mod, package.json, or directory name
• Source directory: Use actual src dir (e.g., src/, app/, cmd/)
• Dev server command: Match the framework (e.g., next dev, uvicorn --reload, air; JVM → build_entrypoint plus the §2.2 dev task for the detected stack — Quarkus quarkusDev / quarkus:dev, Micronaut run / mn:run, Vert.x vertxRun / vertx:run, Spring Boot bootRun / spring-boot:run)
• Test command: Match the detected test runner (§2.7)
• Lint command (JVM): After pruning, lint must remain check / verify; per-tool rows use the Step 5 catalog table
• Migration commands (JVM): Use db-migrate-liquibase vs db-migrate-flyway (or Taskfile db:migrate:*) per java_build
• Port numbers: Use framework defaults (3000 for Node, 8000 for Python, 8080 for Go)

Mode A — Enhance Existing File

When MODE = "enhance", do NOT replace the file from scratch. Instead, analyze it and improve it surgically.

5A.1 Analyze Existing File

Compare EXISTING_CONTENT against the PROJECT_PROFILE and best practices. Build a gap analysis:

Missing preamble/config — Check if the file has the recommended preamble:

• Makefile: SHELL := bash, .ONESHELL, .SHELLFLAGS, .DELETE_ON_ERROR, MAKEFLAGS
• Taskfile: version: '3', output:, dotenv:
• Justfile: set shell, set dotenv-load, set export
• Magefile: //go:build mage, proper imports

Missing standard targets — Check which of these are absent:

• help / default (self-documenting)
• build, test, lint, clean, dev, fmt, and JVM catalog targets (lint-checkstyle, db-migrate-flyway, …) after template pruning
• ci (aggregate target)

Missing project-specific targets — Based on PROJECT_PROFILE, check for:

• Docker targets (if has_docker but no docker targets in file)
• Database: canonical db-migrate-* / db:migrate:* matching java_build
• Typecheck target (if TypeScript/mypy detected but no typecheck target)
• Generate target (if code generation tools detected)
• Coverage target (if test target exists but no coverage variant)
• JVM: build / test / check delegating to <build_entrypoint> when java_build is set (not only generic shell or wrong ecosystem)
• JVM multi-module: module-build / module-test / module-check (or Taskfile module:*) when the repo is a Gradle multi-project or Maven reactor and per-module commands are useful

Quality issues — Check for anti-patterns from best practices:

• JVM: recipes that are not in the Step 5 catalog table (or wrong tool on a recipe, e.g. Liquibase task on a Flyway-only repo) — replace with catalog names or delete
• Targets without descriptions/documentation
• Missing .PHONY declarations (Makefile)
• Hardcoded tool paths that should be variables
• Missing version/commit detection
• No self-documenting help target

5A.2 Plan Changes

Build a list of specific changes to make:

CHANGES = [
  { type: "add_preamble", detail: "Add .SHELLFLAGS and .DELETE_ON_ERROR" },
  { type: "add_target", name: "docker-build", detail: "Dockerfile detected but no docker target" },
  { type: "add_target", name: "help", detail: "No self-documenting help target" },
  { type: "fix_quality", detail: "Add ## comments to 3 targets missing descriptions" },
  { type: "add_variable", detail: "Add VERSION/COMMIT detection via git" },
  ...
]

5A.3 Apply Changes

• Preserve the existing structure — Keep the user's ordering, naming, and style
• Preserve existing targets exactly — Do NOT modify working targets unless fixing a clear bug or adding a missing description
• Add new targets in the appropriate section — Follow the existing grouping pattern (if the file uses ##@ sections, add to matching section; if no sections, append logically)
• Add missing preamble lines at the top, before existing content
• Add missing variables near existing variable declarations
• Use the template as reference for the syntax of new targets, but adapt to match the style already present in the file (e.g., if existing Makefile uses tabs + simple recipes, don't introduce complex multi-line scripts)

Quality Checks (Both Modes)

Before writing the file, verify:

• All targets have descriptions/documentation (## comments, desc:, [doc()], doc comments)
• No hardcoded paths that should be variables
• Package manager / build entrypoint detection matches the repo (Gradle/Maven wrappers, npm/pnpm, etc.)
• Self-documenting help target is included
• .PHONY declarations for all non-file targets (Makefile only)
• Dangerous operations have confirmations (Justfile) or warnings

Step 6: Write File & Report

6.1 Write the File

Mode B (Generate New):

Write the generated content using the Write tool:

Mode A (Enhance Existing):

Write the enhanced content to the same path where the existing file was found (preserving the original filename casing and location). The file is updated in-place — no need to ask about overwriting since we're improving, not replacing.

6.2 Display Summary

Display summary using format from references/SUMMARY-FORMAT.md. Shows targets table, project profile used, and quick start command for Mode B (generate), or what changed + new/existing targets for Mode A (enhance). Include installation hints if the tool requires setup.

Step 7: Project Documentation Integration

After writing the build file, integrate quick commands into project docs. For detailed integration procedures (README, AGENTS.md, existing markdown) → read references/DOC-INTEGRATION.md

Brief: scan for existing command sections, update or append quick reference, suggest AGENTS.md creation if missing.

Artifact Ownership and Config Policy

• Primary ownership: generated or enhanced build automation files (Makefile, Taskfile.yml, justfile, magefile.go).
• Allowed companion updates: quick command snippets in existing docs or AGENTS.md when directly tied to the generated build workflow.
• Config policy: config-agnostic by design. This skill uses repository detection and fixed AI Factory context files rather than config.yaml.