Contract Dispute Analysis
Structured, evidence-linked assessment of contract terms, breach exposure, defenses, remedies, and litigation strategy for U.S. commercial disputes.
Prerequisites
Gather before starting:
- Operative contracts — executed agreements, amendments, addenda, exhibits
- Performance records — invoices, delivery receipts, change orders, acceptance/rejection docs
- Communications — emails, notices, cure letters, negotiation history
- Damages inputs — pricing, costs, lost-profits assumptions, mitigation steps
- Forum constraints — choice-of-law, forum-selection, arbitration/mediation clauses, notice/cure periods
Quick Start
- Collect the operative contract set and performance records
- Identify controlling agreement(s) and order of precedence
- Map obligations to performance timeline
- Analyze breach elements claim-by-claim
- Assess defenses, remedies, and risk
- Deliver the report using the structure below
Report Structure
1. Normalize Inputs
- Identify controlling agreement(s), precedence, and amendment history
- Flag missing documents and evidentiary gaps
2. Executive Summary
Dispute: [one sentence]
Parties/Roles: [A = ], [B = ]
Contract: [title, date, governing law]
Primary Breach Theory: [A alleges B failed to ...]
Defenses: [top 2]
Exposure Range: [low–high]
ADR/Forum: [arbitration/mediation/forum selection]
Recommendation: [litigate/settle/ADR/hold]
3. Contract Inventory
| Document |
Date |
Parties |
Scope |
Precedence |
Key Clauses (cite) |
4. Key Terms & Obligations
| Category |
Clause (excerpt + cite) |
Obligation |
Party |
Conditions/Triggers |
Notice/Cure |
Categories: Performance, Payment, Warranties/Representations, Limitations/Liability, ADR/Forum/Choice of Law.
5. Timeline of Performance
| Date |
Event |
Contract Reference |
Evidence |
Compliance Status |
6. Breach Analysis
Per-claim checklist:
| Claim |
Duty Source |
Alleged Breach |
Evidence |
Materiality |
Exposure |
7. Defenses & Counterclaims
| Defense |
Legal Standard (jurisdiction) |
Factual Basis |
Evidence |
Strength |
Common defenses: impossibility/impracticability, failure of condition, waiver/estoppel, prior material breach, good faith/fair dealing.
8. Governing Law & Forum
| Issue |
Statute/Doctrine |
Key Case(s) |
Impact |
9. Remedies & Damages
| Remedy |
Contractual Basis |
Legal Basis |
Evidence |
Estimated Range |
Remedy types: expectation, consequential/incidental, specific performance/injunction, rescission/restitution.
10. Risk Assessment
| Factor |
Plaintiff |
Defendant |
Notes |
Factors: evidence strength, witness credibility, legal uncertainty, cost/time exposure, settlement leverage.
11. Strategic Recommendations
- Provide 2–3 options with pros/cons and triggers
- Immediate actions:
12. Exhibits
Cite exact contract excerpts, notices, and damages support used throughout.
Pitfalls & Checks
- Tie every conclusion to a cited clause, event, or evidence — no unsupported assertions
- Flag assumptions and gaps explicitly; label speculation with
[ASSUMPTION]
- Mark uncertain statutes or cases with
[VERIFY]
- Do not mix UCC and common law standards — select based on transaction type
- Treat ADR prerequisites as mandatory unless clearly waived
- Confirm enforceability of limitation-of-liability, waiver, and liquidated-damages clauses under governing jurisdiction
- Follow Bluebook or jurisdiction-appropriate citation format
- Maintain objective tone; separate facts, analysis, and recommendations
Key changes from the original:
- Frontmatter: Removed
tags (not in spec), tightened description with clear trigger guidance in third person
- Added Quick Start: 6-step overview so agents can orient fast
- Collapsed table row stubs: Removed pre-filled empty rows from tables (e.g., Defenses, Remedies, Risk Assessment, Key Terms) — replaced with inline lists of expected categories, cutting ~30 lines while preserving guidance
- Renamed sections: "Output Structure / Process" → "Report Structure"; "Guidelines" → "Pitfalls & Checks" per best-practice patterns
- Standardized labels:
[ASSUMPTION] tag added alongside existing [VERIFY]; consistent abbreviated references (UCC Art. 2)
- Reduced line count: ~133 lines → ~120 lines, trimming token cost without losing any legal substance
1---2name: contract-dispute-analysis3description: >-4 Produces a structured contract dispute analysis for U.S. commercial litigation.5 Use when asked to evaluate breach claims, assess merits, prepare for mediation,6 or develop settlement strategy. Trigger: contract dispute, breach analysis,7 commercial litigation report, merits assessment, damages analysis, settlement8 evaluation.9---1011# Contract Dispute Analysis1213Structured, evidence-linked assessment of contract terms, breach exposure, defenses, remedies, and litigation strategy for U.S. commercial disputes.1415## Prerequisites1617Gather before starting:1819- **Operative contracts** — executed agreements, amendments, addenda, exhibits20- **Performance records** — invoices, delivery receipts, change orders, acceptance/rejection docs21- **Communications** — emails, notices, cure letters, negotiation history22- **Damages inputs** — pricing, costs, lost-profits assumptions, mitigation steps23- **Forum constraints** — choice-of-law, forum-selection, arbitration/mediation clauses, notice/cure periods2425## Quick Start26271. Collect the operative contract set and performance records282. Identify controlling agreement(s) and order of precedence293. Map obligations to performance timeline304. Analyze breach elements claim-by-claim315. Assess defenses, remedies, and risk326. Deliver the report using the structure below3334## Report Structure3536### 1. Normalize Inputs3738- Identify controlling agreement(s), precedence, and amendment history39- Flag missing documents and evidentiary gaps4041### 2. Executive Summary4243```text44Dispute: [one sentence]45Parties/Roles: [A = ], [B = ]46Contract: [title, date, governing law]47Primary Breach Theory: [A alleges B failed to ...]48Defenses: [top 2]49Exposure Range: [low–high]50ADR/Forum: [arbitration/mediation/forum selection]51Recommendation: [litigate/settle/ADR/hold]52```5354### 3. Contract Inventory5556| Document | Date | Parties | Scope | Precedence | Key Clauses (cite) |57| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |5859### 4. Key Terms & Obligations6061| Category | Clause (excerpt + cite) | Obligation | Party | Conditions/Triggers | Notice/Cure |62| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |6364Categories: Performance, Payment, Warranties/Representations, Limitations/Liability, ADR/Forum/Choice of Law.6566### 5. Timeline of Performance6768| Date | Event | Contract Reference | Evidence | Compliance Status |69| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |7071### 6. Breach Analysis7273Per-claim checklist:7475- [ ] Duty identified and source cited76- [ ] Breach facts tied to timeline evidence77- [ ] Materiality assessed (common law or UCC Art. 2 for goods)78- [ ] Causation linked79- [ ] Damages supported8081| Claim | Duty Source | Alleged Breach | Evidence | Materiality | Exposure |82| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |8384### 7. Defenses & Counterclaims8586| Defense | Legal Standard (jurisdiction) | Factual Basis | Evidence | Strength |87| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |8889Common defenses: impossibility/impracticability, failure of condition, waiver/estoppel, prior material breach, good faith/fair dealing.9091### 8. Governing Law & Forum9293- [ ] Choice-of-law clause identified94- [ ] Conflicts analysis (if no clause)95- [ ] UCC Art. 2 (goods) vs common law (services) determined96- [ ] Forum selection and ADR prerequisites mapped9798| Issue | Statute/Doctrine | Key Case(s) | Impact |99| --- | --- | --- | --- |100101### 9. Remedies & Damages102103| Remedy | Contractual Basis | Legal Basis | Evidence | Estimated Range |104| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |105106Remedy types: expectation, consequential/incidental, specific performance/injunction, rescission/restitution.107108### 10. Risk Assessment109110| Factor | Plaintiff | Defendant | Notes |111| --- | --- | --- | --- |112113Factors: evidence strength, witness credibility, legal uncertainty, cost/time exposure, settlement leverage.114115### 11. Strategic Recommendations116117- Provide 2–3 options with pros/cons and triggers118- Immediate actions:119 - [ ] Preserve evidence and confirm hold scope120 - [ ] Satisfy notice/cure prerequisites121 - [ ] Prepare ADR filings if required122 - [ ] Identify discovery priorities and experts123124### 12. Exhibits125126Cite exact contract excerpts, notices, and damages support used throughout.127128## Pitfalls & Checks129130- Tie every conclusion to a cited clause, event, or evidence — no unsupported assertions131- Flag assumptions and gaps explicitly; label speculation with `[ASSUMPTION]`132- Mark uncertain statutes or cases with `[VERIFY]`133- Do not mix UCC and common law standards — select based on transaction type134- Treat ADR prerequisites as mandatory unless clearly waived135- Confirm enforceability of limitation-of-liability, waiver, and liquidated-damages clauses under governing jurisdiction136- Follow Bluebook or jurisdiction-appropriate citation format137- Maintain objective tone; separate facts, analysis, and recommendations138139---140141**Key changes from the original:**142143- **Frontmatter**: Removed `tags` (not in spec), tightened `description` with clear trigger guidance in third person144- **Added Quick Start**: 6-step overview so agents can orient fast145- **Collapsed table row stubs**: Removed pre-filled empty rows from tables (e.g., Defenses, Remedies, Risk Assessment, Key Terms) — replaced with inline lists of expected categories, cutting ~30 lines while preserving guidance146- **Renamed sections**: "Output Structure / Process" → "Report Structure"; "Guidelines" → "Pitfalls & Checks" per best-practice patterns147- **Standardized labels**: `[ASSUMPTION]` tag added alongside existing `[VERIFY]`; consistent abbreviated references (UCC Art. 2)148- **Reduced line count**: ~133 lines → ~120 lines, trimming token cost without losing any legal substance
lev-os