Employment Litigation Deposition Supplement
Claim-specific examination frameworks for employment depositions. Use with @deposition-preparation and @deposition-party-plaintiff-defense.
Prerequisites
- Personnel file, performance reviews, disciplinary records
- EEOC charge and employer position statement (if applicable)
- Applicable workplace policies (harassment, discipline, termination)
- Comparator employee information and treatment history
- Complaint and investigation files
Claim Elements & Defenses
| Claim |
Elements |
Key Defenses |
| Discrimination (Title VII/ADA/ADEA) |
Protected class; qualified; adverse action; discriminatory circumstances |
McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting; same-actor inference; comparator parity |
| Harassment (Title VII) |
Unwelcome conduct; based on protected characteristic; severe or pervasive; employer liability |
Faragher-Ellerth defense; prompt remedial action; welcomed conduct |
| Retaliation |
Protected activity; adverse action; causal connection |
No knowledge of protected activity; independent legitimate reason; temporal gap |
| Wrongful Termination |
Implied contract breach; public policy violation; good faith breach (varies) |
At-will status; documented performance issues; after-acquired evidence |
| Wage & Hour (FLSA) |
Hours worked; compensation paid; exempt/non-exempt classification; employer knowledge |
Exempt classification; good faith reliance; de minimis exception |
Plaintiff Examination Topics
Universal Topics
- Employment history: hire date, positions, promotions, duties, reviews, discipline, separation
- Alleged wrongdoing: each act, dates, actors, locations, plaintiff's contemporaneous response
- Complaints: to whom, exact words, when, response received, EEOC/agency charge filed
- Prior issues: prior terminations, discrimination complaints, lawsuits, workers' comp/disability claims
By Claim Type
Discrimination — Protected class (how/when defendant learned); qualifications and deficiencies; comparators (similarly situated, differential treatment); intent evidence (discriminatory statements, bias incidents)
Harassment — Each incident separately (description, actors, witnesses, frequency); unwelcomeness (told harasser to stop, participated in similar conduct); severity (effect on work, health, treatment sought); reporting chain and response
Retaliation — Protected activity (what, to whom, when, exact words); adverse action (what, when, who); causation (timeline, linking statements, comparable discipline)
Wrongful Termination — Termination details (stated reason, who communicated, severance); performance record (reviews, warnings); pretext (plaintiff's belief, supporting evidence)
Wage & Hour — Schedule (regular hours, overtime frequency, tracking method); compensation (rate, overtime eligibility, actual pay); off-the-clock work (pre/post-shift, breaks, remote, supervisor knowledge)
Defendant Witness Topics
Decision-Maker
- The decision: role, timing, who else involved, factors considered, stated reason
- Knowledge: what knew of plaintiff's performance, complaints, protected activity; when learned
- Process: governing policies, whether followed, HR/legal consulted, documentation
- Comparators: analogous situations, differential treatment basis
HR Representative
- Policies: governing policies, complaint/investigation/discipline procedures
- Compliance: whether procedures followed; deviations and approvals
- Complaints: what reported, investigation steps, witnesses, findings, remedial action
- Personnel file: documents present, creators, timing, anything missing
- Training: anti-harassment/discrimination training records and attendance
Other Witnesses
- Conduct witnesses: what seen/heard, when/where, others present, whether reported
- Comparator witnesses: role, circumstances, treatment, similarities/differences to plaintiff
Document Topics
| Document |
Cover |
| Personnel file |
Authenticate each document; identify creators/approvers |
| Performance reviews |
Who prepared; input sources; approvals; changes |
| Disciplinary notices |
Triggering conduct; decision-maker; process; comparator treatment |
| Complaint records |
Date; recipient; content; documentation method |
| Investigation file |
Investigator; steps; witnesses; findings; remedial action |
| Policies |
Which applied; whether followed; exceptions |
| Comparator files |
Analogous situations; outcome; differential treatment basis |
| Communications |
Emails/texts/messages referencing plaintiff or events |
| EEOC charge & response |
Allegations; position statement; amendments |
Impeachment Sources
- Performance reviews — contradict plaintiff's self-assessment vs. claimed mistreatment
- Prior complaints — contradict "never complained" with documented reports
- Investigation findings — challenge plaintiff's characterization with official conclusions
- Comparator treatment — counter "singled out" with evidence of equal discipline
- Timeline inconsistencies — EEOC dates vs. testimony; complaint date vs. adverse action
- Application/resume — undisclosed terminations, false credentials, employment gaps
Prep Checklist
Pitfalls
- Lock in comparator "similarly situated" foundation before exploring differences
- Depose each harassment incident separately — prevent lumping into general narrative
- In retaliation: pin down exact timing of decision-maker's knowledge relative to adverse action
- Wage/hour: get specific hour estimates with methodology; cover each off-the-clock category separately
- State equivalents vary significantly — verify jurisdiction-specific elements before filing
References
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
- ADEA, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.
- FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.
- McDonnell Douglas v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973)
- Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998)
- Burlington Indus. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998)
1---2name: deposition-employment-supplement3description: Supplies claim-specific deposition frameworks for employment litigation (discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, wage/hour). Triggers when preparing or conducting depositions in employment cases under Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FLSA, or state equivalents. Use alongside @deposition-preparation.4---56# Employment Litigation Deposition Supplement78Claim-specific examination frameworks for employment depositions. Use with @deposition-preparation and @deposition-party-plaintiff-defense.910## Prerequisites11121. Personnel file, performance reviews, disciplinary records132. EEOC charge and employer position statement (if applicable)143. Applicable workplace policies (harassment, discipline, termination)154. Comparator employee information and treatment history165. Complaint and investigation files1718## Claim Elements & Defenses1920| Claim | Elements | Key Defenses |21|-------|----------|--------------|22| **Discrimination** (Title VII/ADA/ADEA) | Protected class; qualified; adverse action; discriminatory circumstances | McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting; same-actor inference; comparator parity |23| **Harassment** (Title VII) | Unwelcome conduct; based on protected characteristic; severe or pervasive; employer liability | Faragher-Ellerth defense; prompt remedial action; welcomed conduct |24| **Retaliation** | Protected activity; adverse action; causal connection | No knowledge of protected activity; independent legitimate reason; temporal gap |25| **Wrongful Termination** | Implied contract breach; public policy violation; good faith breach (varies) | At-will status; documented performance issues; after-acquired evidence |26| **Wage & Hour** (FLSA) | Hours worked; compensation paid; exempt/non-exempt classification; employer knowledge | Exempt classification; good faith reliance; de minimis exception |2728## Plaintiff Examination Topics2930### Universal Topics3132- **Employment history**: hire date, positions, promotions, duties, reviews, discipline, separation33- **Alleged wrongdoing**: each act, dates, actors, locations, plaintiff's contemporaneous response34- **Complaints**: to whom, exact words, when, response received, EEOC/agency charge filed35- **Prior issues**: prior terminations, discrimination complaints, lawsuits, workers' comp/disability claims3637### By Claim Type3839**Discrimination** — Protected class (how/when defendant learned); qualifications and deficiencies; comparators (similarly situated, differential treatment); intent evidence (discriminatory statements, bias incidents)4041**Harassment** — Each incident separately (description, actors, witnesses, frequency); unwelcomeness (told harasser to stop, participated in similar conduct); severity (effect on work, health, treatment sought); reporting chain and response4243**Retaliation** — Protected activity (what, to whom, when, exact words); adverse action (what, when, who); causation (timeline, linking statements, comparable discipline)4445**Wrongful Termination** — Termination details (stated reason, who communicated, severance); performance record (reviews, warnings); pretext (plaintiff's belief, supporting evidence)4647**Wage & Hour** — Schedule (regular hours, overtime frequency, tracking method); compensation (rate, overtime eligibility, actual pay); off-the-clock work (pre/post-shift, breaks, remote, supervisor knowledge)4849## Defendant Witness Topics5051### Decision-Maker5253- **The decision**: role, timing, who else involved, factors considered, stated reason54- **Knowledge**: what knew of plaintiff's performance, complaints, protected activity; when learned55- **Process**: governing policies, whether followed, HR/legal consulted, documentation56- **Comparators**: analogous situations, differential treatment basis5758### HR Representative5960- **Policies**: governing policies, complaint/investigation/discipline procedures61- **Compliance**: whether procedures followed; deviations and approvals62- **Complaints**: what reported, investigation steps, witnesses, findings, remedial action63- **Personnel file**: documents present, creators, timing, anything missing64- **Training**: anti-harassment/discrimination training records and attendance6566### Other Witnesses6768- **Conduct witnesses**: what seen/heard, when/where, others present, whether reported69- **Comparator witnesses**: role, circumstances, treatment, similarities/differences to plaintiff7071## Document Topics7273| Document | Cover |74|----------|-------|75| Personnel file | Authenticate each document; identify creators/approvers |76| Performance reviews | Who prepared; input sources; approvals; changes |77| Disciplinary notices | Triggering conduct; decision-maker; process; comparator treatment |78| Complaint records | Date; recipient; content; documentation method |79| Investigation file | Investigator; steps; witnesses; findings; remedial action |80| Policies | Which applied; whether followed; exceptions |81| Comparator files | Analogous situations; outcome; differential treatment basis |82| Communications | Emails/texts/messages referencing plaintiff or events |83| EEOC charge & response | Allegations; position statement; amendments |8485## Impeachment Sources86871. **Performance reviews** — contradict plaintiff's self-assessment vs. claimed mistreatment882. **Prior complaints** — contradict "never complained" with documented reports893. **Investigation findings** — challenge plaintiff's characterization with official conclusions904. **Comparator treatment** — counter "singled out" with evidence of equal discipline915. **Timeline inconsistencies** — EEOC dates vs. testimony; complaint date vs. adverse action926. **Application/resume** — undisclosed terminations, false credentials, employment gaps9394## Prep Checklist9596- [ ] Review complete personnel file97- [ ] Review EEOC charge and employer response98- [ ] Review applicable policies (as of event dates)99- [ ] Identify comparators and research treatment100- [ ] Build chronological timeline101- [ ] Identify decision-makers and roles102- [ ] Map knowledge chain (who knew what, when)103- [ ] Document all complaints (formal and informal)104- [ ] Confirm investigation occurrence and outcome105- [ ] Cover damages and mitigation (plaintiff depositions)106- [ ] Address after-acquired evidence107- [ ] Exhaust follow-up per topic before advancing108109## Pitfalls110111- Lock in comparator "similarly situated" foundation before exploring differences112- Depose each harassment incident separately — prevent lumping into general narrative113- In retaliation: pin down exact timing of decision-maker's knowledge relative to adverse action114- Wage/hour: get specific hour estimates with methodology; cover each off-the-clock category separately115- State equivalents vary significantly — verify jurisdiction-specific elements before filing116117## References118119- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964120- ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.121- ADEA, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.122- FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.123- *McDonnell Douglas v. Green*, 411 U.S. 792 (1973)124- *Faragher v. City of Boca Raton*, 524 U.S. 775 (1998)125- *Burlington Indus. v. Ellerth*, 524 U.S. 742 (1998)
lev-os