Drafting Credit Memos
When To Use
- Recommending a new bond purchase, loan participation, or credit facility for a portfolio or credit committee
- Documenting the rationale for increasing, reducing, or maintaining an existing credit exposure
- Presenting a credit opinion on a new issuer or counterparty for internal approval
- Refreshing an annual or semi-annual credit review on a held position
- Supporting a rating change recommendation (upgrade, downgrade, or watch placement)
Inputs To Gather
- Issuer/borrower identity: Legal name, ticker, CUSIP/ISIN, sector classification (GICS or internal taxonomy)
- Financial statements: Minimum three years of audited financials plus latest interim period; confirm GAAP vs. IFRS basis
- Capital structure detail: Debt schedule with maturities, coupon rates, seniority, covenants, and guarantor structure
- Market data: Current spread levels (OAS, Z-spread, or CDS), comparable issuer spreads, recent price action
- Rating agency views: Moody's/S&P/Fitch ratings, outlooks, and most recent rating action commentary
- Industry context: Sector fundamentals, competitive positioning, key risk drivers (commodity exposure, regulatory, cyclicality)
- Transaction specifics (if new issue): Proposed terms, use of proceeds, pricing guidance, syndicate structure
- Portfolio context: Current exposure, concentration limits, mandate guidelines, and any investment policy constraints [VERIFY]
Workflow
Confirm scope and recommendation direction
- Clarify whether memo is for new investment, annual review, or event-driven reassessment
- Identify the target audience (credit committee, portfolio manager, trading desk)
- Determine recommendation type: Buy / Hold / Sell / Avoid, with size and tenor guidance
Build the issuer profile
- Summarize business description: revenue mix, geographic footprint, market position
- Identify the 3-5 key credit drivers (e.g., leverage trajectory, margin stability, asset quality, liquidity, management track record)
- Note ownership structure and any parent/subsidiary support or structural subordination
Conduct financial analysis
- Compute and trend core credit metrics: Debt/EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBITDA/Interest), FFO/Debt, FCF generation
- Adjust for off-balance-sheet obligations, operating leases (if pre-IFRS 16 comparisons needed), and non-recurring items — flag each adjustment explicitly
- Stress-test metrics under a downside scenario (revenue decline of X%, margin compression of Y bps) and identify the break-even deterioration level
- Compare metrics against rating agency medians for the assigned rating category [VERIFY agency-specific methodology]
Assess capital structure and recovery
- Map the priority-of-claims waterfall: secured → senior unsecured → subordinated → equity
- Estimate recovery prospects by tranche using enterprise value or asset-based approach
- Flag covenant protections or weaknesses (incurrence vs. maintenance tests, restricted payments baskets, change-of-control provisions)
Evaluate relative value
- Compare spread to sector peers at similar rating, maturity, and seniority
- Assess whether current spread compensates for identified risks vs. comparables
- Note any technical factors: index eligibility, supply/demand dynamics, event catalysts
Formulate recommendation
- State recommendation clearly: action (Buy/Hold/Sell), notional size, target spread or price, and investment horizon
- Summarize supporting thesis in 2-3 sentences
- List key risks to the recommendation and monitoring triggers (e.g., leverage exceeding 4.5x, downgrade to below-IG)
Draft the memo
- Use the output structure below
- Write in direct, declarative style — lead each section with the conclusion, then support with data
- Mark any unverified data points with [VERIFY]
Output
Structure the credit memo with these sections:
- Executive Summary — Recommendation, issuer name, rating, key metric snapshot, and 2-3 sentence thesis
- Issuer Overview — Business description, revenue breakdown, competitive position, ownership
- Industry & Macro Context — Sector trends, regulatory environment, cyclical positioning
- Financial Analysis — Historical and projected metrics table, adjustment notes, stress scenario results
- Capital Structure & Recovery — Debt maturity profile, priority waterfall, covenant summary
- Relative Value — Spread comparison table vs. peers, technical factors
- Risk Factors — Ranked list of 3-5 material risks with severity assessment
- Recommendation & Monitoring — Actionable conclusion, position sizing rationale, triggers for review
- Appendix — Detailed financial tables, source list, rating history
Quality Checks
- All credit metrics tie back to sourced financials; no computed ratio is left without its inputs shown
- Recommendation is internally consistent — risk factors do not contradict the thesis without explicit acknowledgment
- Covenant analysis references actual indenture or credit agreement language, not summaries [VERIFY document availability]
- Peer comparison uses issuers of genuinely comparable credit profile (same sector, similar rating band, comparable maturity)
- Stress scenario assumptions are stated and plausible, not arbitrary round-number shocks
- Spread and pricing data carry timestamps — stale data is flagged
- Portfolio limit compliance is confirmed against current mandate or IPS guidelines [VERIFY specific fund constraints]
- No rating agency content is reproduced verbatim beyond fair-use thresholds; paraphrase and cite