lev-os Evaluating Platform Acquisition Targets
When To Use
- Screening a potential platform acquisition for a PE fund or family office
- Comparing multiple platform candidates within a target sub-sector
- Preparing an investment committee memo on a platform opportunity
- Assessing whether a company can serve as the anchor for a buy-and-build strategy
- Re-evaluating an existing portfolio company's viability as a roll-up platform
Inputs To Gather
- Company financials: Trailing 3-year P&L, balance sheet, cash flow statement; TTM EBITDA with addbacks schedule
- Industry context: Market size, growth rate, fragmentation level, competitive landscape map
- Management details: Org chart, tenure of key executives, equity rollover expectations, post-close role commitments
- Customer data: Revenue concentration (top 10 customers as % of revenue), contract terms, churn/retention metrics, recurring vs. project-based mix
- Add-on pipeline: List of potential bolt-on targets with estimated size, geography, and strategic rationale
- Deal parameters: Indicative valuation range, proposed capital structure, sponsor equity check size, expected hold period
Workflow
Confirm thesis and screening criteria — Define the investment thesis driving the platform search (e.g., fragmented HVAC services, specialty chemicals distribution). Establish hard filters: minimum EBITDA floor, geography, end-market exposure, and deal size range.
Assess industry positioning
- Map the target's market share relative to top 5 competitors
- Evaluate barriers to entry: regulatory licenses, customer switching costs, proprietary technology, scale advantages
- Identify secular tailwinds or headwinds (demographic shifts, regulatory trends, technology disruption) [VERIFY: industry-specific regulatory drivers]
- Score fragmentation opportunity: number of sub-scale competitors available as add-ons
Analyze financial profile
- Normalize EBITDA: strip out owner compensation, one-time items, related-party transactions; document each addback with supporting evidence
- Evaluate margin trajectory: gross margin stability, SG&A leverage potential, capex intensity (maintenance vs. growth)
- Stress-test revenue durability: recurring revenue percentage, backlog visibility, contract renewal rates
- Assess working capital dynamics: DSO, DIO, DPO trends; flag seasonal cash flow swings
Evaluate management and organizational readiness
- Gauge CEO/founder willingness to partner with institutional capital and accept governance changes
- Assess depth of second-tier management: can the business operate if one or two key people depart?
- Identify functional gaps that need immediate hiring post-close (CFO upgrade, VP of M&A, HR leader)
- Evaluate existing systems infrastructure: ERP, CRM, financial reporting cadence — can it absorb bolt-ons without major overhaul?
Size the add-on runway
- Build a target universe: count of actionable acquisition candidates within the defined geography and service line
- Estimate typical add-on valuation multiples vs. platform entry multiple (quantify the multiple arbitrage)
- Assess integration complexity per add-on: shared back-office feasibility, brand consolidation, cross-sell potential
- Model cumulative EBITDA build from organic growth plus a realistic add-on cadence (e.g., 2–3 tuck-ins per year)
Construct risk matrix
- Customer concentration risk (any single customer >15% of revenue is a flag)
- Key-person dependency
- Regulatory or environmental exposure [VERIFY: applicable federal/state regulations for target industry]
- Technology obsolescence or disruption risk
- Integration execution risk at projected acquisition pace
Synthesize scoring and recommendation
- Score the target across five dimensions: industry attractiveness, financial quality, management strength, organic growth potential, and add-on runway (use a 1–5 scale for each)
- Calculate a composite weighted score aligned to fund strategy priorities
- Provide a clear proceed / pass / conditional-proceed recommendation with rationale
Output
Produce a Platform Evaluation Report containing:
- Executive summary: One-paragraph investment thesis with composite score and recommendation
- Industry overview: Market size, growth, fragmentation, and competitive positioning
- Financial summary: Normalized EBITDA bridge, margin analysis, revenue quality assessment
- Management assessment: Key personnel evaluation, organizational gaps, governance readiness
- Add-on opportunity map: Target universe size, representative bolt-on profiles, projected EBITDA build
- Risk matrix: Ranked risks with proposed mitigants
- Appendix: Detailed addback schedule, comparable transaction multiples, and source data references
Quality Checks
- Every EBITDA addback is individually substantiated — no blanket "management adjustments" without line-item support
- Revenue concentration and customer data are sourced from actuals, not management estimates alone; mark unsourced figures with [VERIFY]
- Add-on target count is grounded in identifiable companies, not top-down market math
- Composite scoring weights are explicitly stated and tied to the fund's stated strategy
- Regulatory and environmental risks reference specific statutes or regulatory bodies [VERIFY: jurisdiction-specific requirements]
- Report distinguishes clearly between confirmed data, management representations, and analyst assumptions
- Recommendation includes conditions or diligence items that must be resolved before advancing to LOI